how tightly were you circumcised?

[13788]

towlie: I'm trying to figure out if I was circumcised tightly or loosely. When I am soft the remaining skin bunches up behind the head, but I can pull it all the way over and stretch it out, with enough room to stick my finger down there. But when I'm hard it only comes up about halfway. Being straight, I don't have much basis for comparison on these things . . .

anyone?

 

[D_Martin van Burden]

So I noticed -- it's really hard to set up a comparison standard here. For instance, do we determine how tightly we were circumsized by pulling on the skin near the glans up over the glans itself?

I can pull that skin over my head when soft. In fact, when I compared size with an uncut friend of mine during my teenage years, I said his dick looked funny and imitated how his looked by pulling my skin over my glans. When it's hard, I can pull the skin up about halfway; it makes for some sensational friction while I masturbate.

 

[txquis]

I posted this somewhere else already....the circumcision thread?

I am loosely circumcised....i can pull the skin over
my head easily when it is soft.
Even when it is hard there is plenty of movable skin,
as opposed to some cut guys whose skin
on their shafts dont move at all when hard.

Someone in that other thread explained to me the various methods of circumcision. i need to look that up again...

 

[13788]

jackinman: Mine is similar to Deeblackthorne's...I can also pull my skin over my dick's head covering it compleatly when its soft. When I'm hard it only goes halfway also.

 

[13788]

H8Monga: Given the fact that mine retracts, mine can look uncircumcised and I have a lot of movable skin when erect too. I've wondered if I was loosely circumcised but also when erect, I clearly see the scar and nothing bunches up behind the head. I really don't know what another circumcised guy's skin on his penis does or if it moves at all.

 

[13788]

tott666: I'm not sure what you're talking about here...

I'm intact. When I'm soft, the foreskin covers the glans. If I'm hard there's no way the foreskin will cover anything! Unless I'm jerking off, in which case I'll sort of drag the foreskin/shaft skin up to/over my glans. There's an awful lot of potential movement in there, isn't it?

I don't think I've ever seen an intact man with a foreskin which will cover the glans when erect, except in American porn... Foreskin fetishist I am not.

 

[13788]

prepstudinsc: Like several of the previous posters, I'm also loosely cut. When I'm soft, the skin can be pulled over most of my head. When I'm hard, I can pull the skin about 1/3 of the way over my head. I've got several friends who are tightly cut and there's really no skin to move. I don't know about the different "styles" or methods of circumcision, but I know that my frenulum was left intact, which supposedly adds all sorts of extra pleasure. Not knowing what it's like to be tightly cut, I can't say if it's better or not. All I know is that I have plenty of pleasurable sensation.

 

[benderten2001]

Without the "advantage" of personally observing and comparing other men (cut or uncut), but I have seen pictures. I would have to say it stands to reason that "loosely cut" means there would be some foreskin "available" certainly when flaccid and more than likely some still remaining even during an erection.

I would imagine at least half (or better) of the glans is covered when completely flaccid. When erect, the foreskin would retract (naturally) as far back as at least the corona edge of the glans or further still back onto the shaft.

I would also think in loose-cut men that the frenulum would be left intact and there would be (perhaps) some evidence of the "second foreskin layer" remaining....(the thin mucosa skin lining just below the glans and about 3/4" to 1" down the shaft itself.)

"Tightly- cut" circumcised men have little (if any) foreskin
"sliding" ability remaining when fully erect.

That much I know for sure.

 

[13788]

prepstudinsc: [quote author=benderten2001 link=board=meetgreet;num=1049740936;start=0#7 date=04/07/03 at 22:16:28]
I would imagine at least half (or better) of the glans is covered when completely flaccid.  When erect, the foreskin would retract  (naturally) as far  back as at least the corona edge of the glans or further still back onto  the shaft.

[/quote]

Well I'm not that loosely cut. When I'm flaccid, the skin just barely touches the corona, it doesn't cover my head. I have to pull it over my head, it just doesn't cover it on its own. When I'm hard, my penis looks like any other cut dick, it's just that I have some skin that moves when I have sex or when I jack off. When I'm hard, I can pull some of the loose skin part way up my head. There is a circumcision scar that is very slight. I guess that my pediatrician who did the cut did a good job.

 

[Pecker]

I'm loosely cut, too, with the frenulum intact. I can easily pull the skin down over the glans and it will stay when i'm soft and it's loose enough to move freely when I'm erect so that masturbation without lube is easy.

Pecker

 

[13788]

u8005821: I was VERY tightly cut to the point of pain with a very hard erection. However, with foreskin restoration, and blood pressure medication I no longer have THAT problem (damn it) OH well life goes on. Enjoy :

 

[13788]

hornybloke: i am tightly cut. for my cock, it's german cut. there is noloose foreskin retained when my cock erect. it feels so good coz i get to feel every touch or skin. when it's in flaccid state, there is a very liitle extra foreskin. girls can get to see every bit of my 8.5in cock!