Gillette
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2006
- Posts
- 6,214
- Media
- 4
- Likes
- 95
- Points
- 268
- Age
- 53
- Location
- Halifax (Nova Scotia, Canada)
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Female
The simplest thing I've said, and the most truthful, is, "I don't feel we're compatible." That's a pretty hard statement to refute.
The simplest thing I've said, and the most truthful, is, "I don't feel we're compatible." That's a pretty hard statement to refute.
Response:
"How do you know we aren't compatible? You haven't given us a chance. I am sure we could grow to love each other if you just let us try. Please baby, don't crush this budding flower just because you haven't given us enough thought."
:biggrin1:
The way I see it is that if they try to argue with your feelings then they have just proven they don't respect your intuition thereby giving you a more concrete reason to say, "No, and that's final".
If you say, "I don't think we're compatible." then they have room to argue it. Change your mind. But feelings are feelings and they aren't up for debate.
Thus the ultimate response should be "I'm sorry but I am just not attracted to you" How can you argue with that?
Men like this also irritate me and I am not like this at all, but I think if I were I would probably get more dates. A lot of times all it takes is persistence. When my brother-in-law Chris asked out my sister for the first time she didn't want to have anything to do with him. Now they have three children together.
Three kids is nothing to sneeze at.
Yes! Exactly Mulebear! I try not to hurt the persons feelings ,which is why I always like to tell the truth! But when I do, no matter how nicely it's prefaced, the person may still be pissed that I'm rejecting them. In which case I now have to be more forceful than I wanted to be in the first place.
So,this is why I just say it! I can not control how they'll act either way!
Mr. Ed & cigarbabe:saevil:
Hell no! Can you imagine all three sick at once?
ROBITUSSIN!
Naughty, I still don't think that "I don't find you attractive" should be a first-line rejection. It would be more appropriate if someone was actually stupid enough to say "but WHY won't you go out with me?" That falls into line with one of my favorite sayings, "don't ask questions for which you really don't want to know the answer."
DC I just mentioned that I would not necessarily use that one myself. I try to think how I would feel if it happened to me. I have had people rant and rave but I tend to just try to stay positive and honest without being cruel.
Which I why, in that situation, I prefer to simply say "no, thank you." It's quite honest, and it's neither "sugar-coating" nor being positive nor negative - just to the point, and keeping it from reflecting upon the person being turned down. You and I have a lot in common, Ryan, as I think we both discovered the couple of times we were hanging out together. I also would prefer someone to be honest with me. You can be honest without being insulting, right?You can't always be positive AND honest Naughty. If you don't like somebody you don't like somebody. You can sugar coat it all you want, but at the end of the day "sugar coat" is just a sugar coated way of saying "being dishonest."
If you think someone is fat or ugly and you tell them that you're just not looking for a boyfriend right now, that's not being positive, that's lying. I'm not arguing that telling them that they are fat or ugly is necessarily the better way to go, for most people it probably isn't, but call me weird- I would actually much prefer the honest response.
Still, any response at all would be preferable to being led on and/or being ignored. I just hate that.
No one is responsible for how another person takes rejection unless that rejection is given in a particular way.
There is a wealth of difference between, "I'm flattered, but not looking." and, "I wouldn't touch you with a ten foot pole".
You can rebuff an advance without disrespecting the person.