How to hit the cul de sac

[StrictlyAvg]

I've been on here a while so I have picked up the anatomy info many times (ChrissyMGreen's a star for this kind of stuff) but if you "use the fkn search function" there are hundreds of hits representing thousands of pages that in the ones I did trawl through seemed to tell me you need a long cock; not the info I needed really! I've already posted a rant in the website section that the search function on this site sucks and it's difficult get to specific pages within threads!! It's not like I'm a bleedin PC numpty but I don't get on with it at all.

And like I said in my OP the woman in the video I saw used seriously vigorous force with the toy she was using and I can see that not going down too well with just anyone so trying to get a more balanced outlook!!

Thanks Dolfette, Fleur and others - the "chalk and cheese" info is welcome i.e. one of you loves it the other doesn't so that's a useful note that it may or may not work.

So I guess the specific info I was after was "are there any positions that would make it easier for a guy of average length to hit that area?" and failing that "are there any toys that have worked; what sorts of design would I be shopping for??"

Cheers all!

 

[Enid]

i remembered coming across this not too long ago --

6 Penetrating Positions for a Small Penis | Tantra: Gateway to Ecstasy

not that you have a small penis -- i realize that title may be offensive. i do not think of average as small. but anyhoo that may be useful to you. not sure.

i knew muttley would chime in and give great advice, as usual! he & i have had a couple convos about this topic.

dolfette, you're so clever!

the trick incidentally to using the search function here (as effectively as is possible) is to use advanced search and do a search on thread titles only. it helps if you have a spectacular memory of course -- oftentimes when i see a thread asking something that i know has been asked before i can find the thread with ease because i will remember the title or key words from the title. you can also add member names too, to the search. so if you know so and so posted this or that, add in the poster's name in addition to the key words.

 

[RawDog]

i knew muttley would chime in and give great advice, as usual! he & i have had a couple convos about this topic.

Thanks for the compliment. We both seem to appreciate this "spot" equally. I think my obsession/passion is based around the connection my wife and I make. It sounds so highschoolish when I write this, but it's like I live to hear the words, "Oh my god, you're so deep inside me." And the way she cums, her vaginal squeezes seem to be totally different. More like she's having contractions all through my cock with different tiny muscles firing off randomly pulling me in, sucking, stroking, swallowing.

One thing I hadn't mentioned; sometimes when we're reaching inside her that deeply, I tend to do kegels hoping to extend myself even further in. This works up to a point, then it backfires. Damned erections can be unpredictable at times. When I squeeze my PC muscles, I trap the blood in my cock, but I also stop the flow of blood coming in. When your erection subsides (which it will tend to do sometimes when your going for the marathon fuckfest), kegelling and holding just makes it go softer and softer. <-- This applies to pretty much anything with sex, not just cds fucking.

 

[Mr_Cumalot]

The guys here with monster dicks show off about hitting the cervix (painful for many girls and you only require 5 inches to do that) and hitting the cul de sac, but the reality is as mentioned by others that you can use other positions for deep penetration if you are smaller. My current lady can only take 5 inches when standing up. Can only take 6 inches of me in doggy position, and cannot have my legs on my shoudlers at all. However she went out with a guy with 5 inches who had her legs on his shoulders and used to get her cul de sac and she'd be flipping all over the place in ectasy.

Oh and don;t poke away at it. Push in until you can get no further, then slowly rub away whilst that deep.

 

[voidout]

Sorry you couldn't make it to Nick8's little soiree in NYC a coupla weeks ago, turned into an all-guy thing in the end. Was good anyway....:biggrin1:

aw, that's really sweet of you! i promised him i'd be at the next one as long as it's on the weekend.

 

[voidout]

on the whole vulture thing -- i've been there, you've been there, i'm really not that bent about it. it's a forum. not everyone's going to be nice. :shrug: i'm sure she's normally quite lovely.

to jeff -- although i've been here since march, i didn't actually start using the forums (among other features), and for months at a time wouldn't even log in, until recently. most people will tell you here that they've really only recently gotten a chance to talk to me and become friends on the site over the past month or two. i appreciate the "pass", i suppose, but i think it's a good idea to keep in mind that there are a lot of people on this site who don't know a lot about sex, their bodies, and have never even heard of half of the situations/experiences people talk about here.

 

[voidout]

this thread has told me:

some posters are delightfully naive

maybe. i'm not sure if it's delightful, though.

 

[voidout]

anyhoo to the OP, did you ever check out sexinfo101?

All Sex Positions

there's like a ton of illustrated positions there. you could just have fun trying each one and see what works best. i think it'll prolly vary for each woman wrt hitting that spot properly. not all women like it either. i love it, and i can has orgasms from it.

thanks for this.

both you and mutley have been incredibly informative.

 

[jeff black]

on the whole vulture thing -- i've been there, you've been there, i'm really not that bent about it. it's a forum. not everyone's going to be nice. :shrug: i'm sure she's normally quite lovely.

to jeff -- although i've been here since march, i didn't actually start using the forums (among other features), and for months at a time wouldn't even log in, until recently. most people will tell you here that they've really only recently gotten a chance to talk to me and become friends on the site over the past month or two. i appreciate the "pass", i suppose, but i think it's a good idea to keep in mind that there are a lot of people on this site who don't know a lot about sex, their bodies, and have never even heard of half of the situations/experiences people talk about here.

And while I'm all for the idea that people aren't well versed in sex and their bodies... I think you can agree that there is absolutely nothing wrong with a bit of googling, or research in order to better yourself, right?

I think intelligence is something that people should use, always. If you don't know something, research is a good thing to do. I know it sounds silly in the world of instant answers, but still... I'd like to think that a healthy bit of intelligence goes a long way, as does making an attempt.

 

[Pitbull]

wassa cul de sac?

A little pouch.
Here it refers to a wonderful little place deep in your vagina at the very end.

Great! Another place that I won't be able to find nor will anyone else :irked:

Oh you are so wrong. I know exactly where it is.
I would so love to show you. :wink:

Since we are speaking in French terms

Mon Cherie,
I am a homme du monde.
I would descend your Mons Veneris en route
to your cul de sac.

You would say c'est bon.

Then upon arriving, I would retreat and advance.
Then repeat.
A multitude of times.
Until you would scream,

Mon Dieu! Mon Dieu! Mon Dieu! Mon Dieu!
A cri d'amour.
I would grip your heavenly derrière and pull you toward me.
Numerous trips down the cul de sac.
Mon Dieu! Mon Dieu! Mon Dieu! Mon Dieu!
C'est magnifique!

You would know that I have savior-faire.
A perfect liaison of hours.

We would both say meci beaucoup before au revoir.

 

[voidout]

And while I'm all for the idea that people aren't well versed in sex and their bodies... I think you can agree that there is absolutely nothing wrong with a bit of googling, or research in order to better yourself, right?

I think intelligence is something that people should use, always. If you don't know something, research is a good thing to do. I know it sounds silly in the world of instant answers, but still... I'd like to think that a healthy bit of intelligence goes a long way, as does making an attempt.

You're assuming that I don't use my intelligence, and I don't think you're trying to imply that or offend me, but really...you are.

Anyway, I completely agree. My only point is that if you've never heard of something existing, you're obviously not going to know what to search for. I had never heard of this part of my body from anyone, ever, that it even existed...THIS was my way of learning. For anyone to get upset about how I went about learning something is quite petty.

I don't want to hijack this, though. If you'd like to reply, feel free to PM me.

 

[jeff black]

You're assuming that I don't use my intelligence, and I don't think you're trying to imply that or offend me, but really...you are.

Anyway, I completely agree. My only point is that if you've never heard of something existing, you're obviously not going to know what to search for. I had never heard of this part of my body from anyone, ever, that it even existed...THIS was my way of learning. For anyone to get upset about how I went about learning something is quite petty.

I don't want to hijack this, though. If you'd like to reply, feel free to PM me.

No thanks.

I don't do well with people telling me what to do, Christina. You'd be wise to just submit the PM next time, rather than telling me what to do. That was a suggestion as opposed to be telling you to pm.

Having said that, to contradict your point, I never made the assumption you didn't use your intelligence. I'm assuming you don't HAVE intelligence about this particular topic... which really isn't an assumption, as you have admitted that you didn't know what cul-de-sac was.

I personally don't any control over your feelings, so if you end up feeing upset, that's your problem. I have no interest in upsetting you, nor am I trying to do that. I'm ATTEMPTING to have an adult conversation, and a polite one at that. One that allows you to understand why someone went at you in annoyance at your lack of interest in making an effort at bettering yourself.

My point, was that it doesn't take much to type the words, cul-de-sac in google. 15 seconds. You'd even get the results faster than asking what it was on lpsg.

As for your way of learning, I suspect it was her beef. It's frustrating to see internet laziness. We all have the world at our fingertips, and yet we choose to have someone spoon feed us an answer. It's lazy, it's childish, and it's the reason some have taken offense.

 

[voidout]

No thanks.

I don't do well with people telling me what to do, Christina. You'd be wise to just submit the PM next time, rather than telling me what to do. That was a suggestion as opposed to be telling you to pm.

I personally don't any control over your feelings, so if you end up feeing upset, that's your problem. I have no interest in upsetting you, nor am I trying to do that. I'm ATTEMPTING to have an adult conversation, and a polite one at that. One that allows you to understand why someone went at you in annoyance at your lack of interest in making an effort at bettering yourself.

It's frustrating to see internet laziness. We all have the world at our fingertips, and yet we choose to have someone spoon feed us an answer. It's lazy, it's childish, and it's the reason some have taken offense.

So you're adult way of having a conversation is to further insult me, (laziness, childish, and "your lack of interest in making an effort at bettering yourself"...really, SUPER polite...) and twist my offer in PMing me into me "commanding" you what to do. Interesting.

I already stated that I google'd it, and that my results didn't show anything until Mickey responded with "AFE zone", that any of it was helpful at all. From there I found what I was looking for.

Oh, and you're right. I do have the world at my fingertips! I should have just PM'd someone with a huge dick to come over and hit my fornix! DUH.

Have a wonderful life.

 

[Gillette]

Oh, and you're right. I do have the world at my fingertips! I should have just PM'd someone with a huge dick to come over and hit my fornix! DUH.

Proving her maturity with every post.

We may have another Mandee.

 

[jeff black]

So you're adult way of having a conversation is to further insult me, (laziness, childish, and "your lack of interest in making an effort at bettering yourself"...really, SUPER polite...) and twist my offer in PMing me into me "commanding" you what to do. Interesting.

I'm concerned that you haven't read my post properly, so I'll take the time to correct the misunderstandings.

For starters, I didn't insult you. The terms laziness and childishness refer to the concept of a person who choses to NOT make the effort to better themself, choosing to INSTEAD ask someone to spoon feed them. If you feel this definition applies to you, then that's fair. However, I'm speaking to a general grouping of individuals who prefers to not try when it comes to bettering themselves.

Second, your PM comment came off as you feeling you had some sort of say over how I communicated on the board. If it wasn't meant as you trying to tell me what to do, then, I can accept that.

Oh, and you're right. I do have the world at my fingertips! I should have just PM'd someone with a huge dick to come over and hit my fornix! DUH.

Have a wonderful life.

Thank you for your incredibly sarcastic well wishes. Now, allow me to continue. If you don't feel you have the world at your fingertips, let me correct you.

You are a young woman, possibly persuing an education, with 100,000,000,000 websites at your disposal. While you may not be interested in looking up things, it doesn't mean that the opportunity isn't there. As for the PMing thing, I'm not suggesting you attempt to find some sort of sexual encounter.

AND as a side note...if cul du sac didn't come up in google, trying cul du sac +vagina gave me all kinds of hits. 154,000 to be exact.

 

[voidout]

Proving her maturity with every post.

We may have another Mandee.

It was a sarcastic joke. It wasn't meant to be taken literally, but that's fine if you'd like to think of me as immature. :shrug: Everyone has an opinion.

 

[Gillette]

It was a sarcastic joke. It wasn't meant to be taken literally, but that's fine if you'd like to think of me as immature. :shrug: Everyone has an opinion.

I don't like to think of you at all, actually.

 

[voidout]

I'm concerned that you haven't read my post properly, so I'll take the time to correct the misunderstandings.

I think we're both misunderstanding one another, or somewhat interpreting each others responses wrong. I'm not trying to insult you, either. My well wishes were to imply I'm done with the topic, and I'd like to move on, if you're willing to do so as well.

Oh, and you're correct. "Cul de Sac" + "vagina" was my third search, which is where this post came from:

Well, anyway...back to the topic.
This website was helpful so far:
The AFE Zone

:shrug:

Also...to explain further what MickeyLee decided to erase, for those like me who didn't quite understand:

Vaginal fornix - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/70/Gray1166.png

after learning the appropriate terminology...

Sorry to not make that clear, and put that in my post.

 

[voidout]

I don't like to think of you at all, actually.

ok.

 

[Pitbull]

It was a sarcastic joke. It wasn't meant to be taken literally

DRAT!
I WAS JUST ON MY WAY OVER.
FOILED AGAIN.