I'm sure the dementia diagnosis for Trump is soon
That can only be done by a psychiatrist/psychologist whom the client is in the care of. Celebrity families will make public announcements about it either when they want to engage in the societal dialogue about the condition or when the symptoms become so obvious that it can't be avoided without a leak. I don't see any indications that the family is beginning to assume his responsibilities for him, so why would you think we're approaching the family revealing this?
Well hate is "unpopular" e.g. it's against the TOS. And that seems to be where all the "Righties" get tripped up and that fact always seems to elude you. You guys really don't know the difference between hate speech and free speech. They are one in the same. It's such a part of who you are it's just inseparable from your core beliefs.
Yes, that aspect of the TOS is unfortunate.
"Free speech" and "hate speech"
do not refer to the same concepts, and yes, I do know the real difference between them. "Free speech" refers to the protection of freedom of (verbal) expression from infringement, Constitutionally speaking from the government, though the concept can be used more broadly if not referring to constitutional status specifically. "Free speech" constitutionally covers nearly all speech, with some slim exceptions like incitement to violence. "Hate speech" is speech that expresses or incites categorical hatred towards a group or an individual based on their group associations. Hate speech is one of the types of speech that is Constitutionally protected as free speech; that is why we associate the two, because unlike you we want to defend the First Amendment rather than revise (subvert) it.
It's no surprise though given the science of the conservative brain how a politician like Trump and the Republican Party in general can harness all your flaws to electoral success:
1. Conservatives tend to focus on the negative
2. Conservatives have a stronger physiological response to threat
3. Conservatives fear new experiences
4. Conservatives’ brains are more reactive to fear
Fear and Anxiety Drive Conservatives' Political Attitudes
No bias there at all...
"This would seem to explain why so many major conservative viewpoints tend to be rooted in
irrational fears..."
Lulz
Were Conservatives wrong a century ago when they started asserting that acceptance of contraceptives was the beginning of a slippery slope towards all sorts of sexual immorality? Nope, they turned out to be 100% in their slippery slope evaluation. Often our evaluation of where things are headed turns out to be right. The real difference is a matter of values, not our predictions being irrational.
It's always clear to us "Lefties" when the "Reich Wing" is about to run off the rails with hate speech which you call "free speech".
I see only shades of difference between open racial hostility and the accommodation of racial hostility. It’s all interrelated and interdependent.
Ok... So what?
As I said, I don't use dog whistles. I'm entirely transparent in this venue about my beliefs and you don't really have any basis for arguing otherwise.
MercuryGirl is far less nuanced than you. Her posts are deleted as hate speech that you "like" while your posts take the long road to the same destination and manage to not run afoul of the TOS. Two sides of the same coin.
Oh no, you're still going on about that?! She has been gone for nearly 6 months now!!
And we've already been over that post once or twice before. There is nothing covert about my behavior in that case. As I said before, I think it was a little heavy-handed and aggressive, but I basically agreed with the point she was making and so Liked the post. I didn't see it as hate speech when I first saw it and Liked it, I didn't when it was reported, I didn't when you last asked me about it, and I
still don't. I don't think what was underlying it was general hatred of "Blacks". There
have been a number of posts that I have skimmed and Liked on the basis of a quick impression and then taken another look and withdrew that because I realized they were bigoted. That post was not one of those.
You seem to be suggesting again that I am cleverly skirting the bounds of what is acceptable. The problem with that is that I am open about my opinions and have a number of times expressed some that could very well have been labeled "hate speech", especially if you had been the judge of that. For example, I at one time expressed the belief that my race overall is
generally superior to others. That is a belief I no longer hold, yet it's important to point out that I received no reprimand at the time. That is likely because I know how to conduct myself in a civil manner. That is what has been saving me, not withholding of views.