Westerners are responsible for developing the philosophy of the value, worth, and rights of the individual. No other society before ultimately saw the individual as anything other than expendable, and frankly most non-Western societies still haven't realized these principles.
More biased bullshit from Crown Price Europid.
You guys use that word about 10 times more often than he has.
Your aim 1.) might be to use it ironically or something, 2.) but it doesn't come across that way...
It's only childish if I was being sarcastic. I wasn't.
Oh my god, that's just so adorable !
Yeah... I'm the one acting like a child.
Take your own advice. Grow up
That was sarcasm, in case you missed it
I'm aware.
So do you have anything to add to the thread other than sarcastic insults?
If that's all you have to offer I totally understand why you support Trump. Birds of a feather...
I'm done .Have a very Merry Christmas !
Illogical conclusion.The trajectory clearly points to a second American Revolution.
"Hate speech" is speech that expresses or incites categorical hatred towards a group or an individual based on their group associations. Hate speech is one of the types of speech that is Constitutionally protected as free speech; that is why we associate the two, because unlike you we want to defend the First Amendment rather than revise (subvert) it.
"
No bias there at all...
"This would seem to explain why so many major conservative viewpoints tend to be rooted in irrational fears..."
Lulz
"
There have been a number of posts that I have skimmed and Liked on the basis of a quick impression and then taken another look and withdrew that because I realized they were bigoted. That post was not one of those.
"
You seem to be suggesting again that I am cleverly skirting the bounds of what is acceptable. The problem with that is that I am open about my opinions and have a number of times expressed some that could very well have been labeled "hate speech", especially if you had been the judge of that. For example, I at one time expressed the belief that my race overall is generally superior to others. That is a belief I no longer hold, yet it's important to point out that I received no reprimand at the time. That is likely because I know how to conduct myself in a civil manner. That is what has been saving me, not withholding of views.
What I see is a country completely divided. We thought Bush divided the US and Obama would heal it, only to see that having a black president divided the nation even more and now Trump is dividing the US far further. The trajectory clearly points to a second American Revolution.
What I see is a country completely divided. We thought Bush divided the US and Obama would heal it, only to see that having a black president divided the nation even more and now Trump is dividing the US far further. The trajectory clearly points to a second American Revolution.
What I see is a country completely divided. We thought Bush divided the US and Obama would heal it, only to see that having a black president divided the nation even more and now Trump is dividing the US far further. The trajectory clearly points to a second American Revolution.
Correct, I meant to say Civil War not Revolution.Probably a second American Civil War, not revolution
You have a country that gets increasingly more divided each administration, with people hoping that the next administration unites the country, only to find it more divided than even before. But this time around, the divide, the chasm is greater than ever before and people are willing to do violent things to maintain what they believe is their way of life - Charlottesville is an example. Just follow the line on the chart and you will see the end point is a new civil war with a country divided and two sides adamantly divided. No one wants to unite and work on consensus. Instead, it's "my way or the highway" approach.Theres no logical way you can deduce that ‘the trajectory clearly points to a second American Revolution’.
You talk about a country divided, Bush dividing the country, Obama dividing it further, and Trump dividing it even further. How you get to why revolution must necessarily spring from various degrees of division is something you don’t discuss, and so you piss your point away. Then you have to bring in a metaphorical subject of ‘trajectory’ and from that you adduce a second American revolution. Bullshit, sir, pure illogical bullshit.
Dont toke up before your next post, OK?
Another point: you move from ‘ I see’ to ‘we thought’. Who the fuck are ‘we’? You can speak for youself, but ‘we’ includes me, and I sure as hell don’t want to be included. Did you ever take freshman English, rhetoric, or a logic course?
Correct, I meant to say Civil War not Revolution.
You have a country that gets increasingly more divided each administration, with people hoping that the next administration unites the country, only to find it more divided than even before. But this time around, the divide, the chasm is greater than ever before and people are willing to do violent things to maintain what they believe is their way of life - Charlottesville is an example. Just follow the line on the chart and you will see the end point is a new civil war with a country divided and two sides adamantly divided. No one wants to unite and work on consensus. Instead, it's "my way or the highway" approach.
...but don't take it from me...history will unfold before our eyes.
Borders? You're living in an old mindset. We live in a world with no defined borders anymore.The borders are too wonky for a civil war. Civil War 2: Cities -vs- the rural bits? How would that even work?