How would you all describe Harry Potter's dick?

[rusty__]

Mr. Radcliffe may not have a huge penis, but he is a very talented young man who has done very well for himself. I'd also venture to say he is more secure than most of the large hung on LPSG who obviously have to continually show off their big cocks to overcome their own insecurities that require them to continually prove themselves as manly. A secure man with 4 inches would make a much more desirable lover than a insecure man with 10.

Kudos!:wink:

 

[SirConcis]

Considering that there is no consensus on whether he is cut or uncut: if you can't tell if cut or uncut, it means you aren't close enough to judge his size.

 

[B_Hungtroll]

Mr. Radcliffe may not have a huge penis, but he is a very talented young man who has done very well for himself. I'd also venture to say he is more secure than most of the large hung on LPSG who obviously have to continually show off their big cocks to overcome their own insecurities that require them to continually prove themselves as manly. A secure man with 4 inches would make a much more desirable lover than a insecure man with 10.

spoken like someone with a small dick.

 

[mephistopheles]

Idk if you guys have seen this video, but it's funny.

Dan Radcliffe acts like a jackass and at about 4 minutes in he pulls out a huge condom and says "I hope it's big enough"

It's pretty fuckin funny.

 

[LADave]

From the pictures of him in Equess I'd desribe it as uncircumsized and average length.

 

[B_Hungtroll]

Idk if you guys have seen this video, but it's funny.

Dan Radcliffe acts like a jackass and at about 4 minutes in he pulls out a huge condom and says "I hope it's big enough"

It's pretty fuckin funny.

That's because Extras was a hysterical show. Every guest star on that HBO gem was brilliant. But yeah he killed it there, who would have thought that Harry Potter could be funny.

 

[farmhand]

and OH YES (typically British) UNCUT !!!! <yum!> http://www.danielradcliffenaked.net/wp-content/nude.jpg

 

[farmhand]

Travis1985 [ http://www.lpsg.org/257543-how-would-you-all-describe-2.html#post3598917 ] provides a photo link to what he says if the "bottom" of the Radcliffe naked-with-horse showing a nicely hung uncut penis. Except doesn't QUITE "match up." Taking that colored studly pic, grey-scaling it, then having to mirror image it to make the glans-peeking-from-foreskin angle match the Radcliffe dick, while those glans angles closely match, notice that Radcliffe's left testicle is the typical slightly lower. In the "mirrored" photo -- UH-oh. It's the [now] RIGHT nut lower -- so CAN'T be THAT pic. Close, but no cigar [unless there's ANOTHER of the cute-boy-uncut-model, cause DOES closely match--other than the testicular difference]

Photos compared --
http://www.lpsg.org/members/farmhan...t;tweaked&quot;/547546-radcliffe`n`fake`.html