The only thing Howard Dean is qualified to do is sell used cars and I'm sure Hillary's staying in the race is in part to make the bastard's life as miserable as possible. I'm still holding out hope for a brokered convention. I'd like to see one in my lifetime. I mean, with everything going to hell in a handbasket, why not?
Thank God someone got this back to the thread.
For those who questioned my statements about how Dean could have named a nominee etc. Much of what I wrote was oversimplification with a bit of exaggeration thrown in. The main point is that the Democratic Party has had three opportunities to crown a nominee. That is all of a sudden Democrats everywhere start stepping forward to endorse a candidate and it didn't happen.
I see Dean as a loser. I really don't think the Democratic Party would be nearly as fragmented as it is now if some one more capable had been the Chairman.
I fully understand HazelGod. He is an independent who happens in this case to be for someone who happens to be a Democrat. Hazel freely admits that he has no loyalty to the Democratic Party. And he has no obligation to automatically throw his support to Hillary if something should happen to Obama.
It is to the "card carying" Democrats that I speak. Hillary is cunning. Hillary can be ruthless. Hillary is also brilliant. She does not have the charisma that Obama has. I don't know if she can give as good a State of the Union address that her husband could give or that Obama would give if he has the chance. Anyone that can say for certainty that Obama and Hillary administrartions would be drastically different if either are elected.
So we go on what each have said. For the life of me, I don't understand this strong uncompromising hostility among card carrying Democrats who say they have the same agenda with the two finalists Obama and Hillary whose agendas are remarkably similar. Their biggest difference is Health care. Clinton is the more liberal on that issue.
Again my first post was an attempt to get people talking about this main issue and that is. Could Dean, the DNC and the Super Delegates have acted in a way to bring this chapter to a close with a strong unified party.
That wouldn't have to mean Crown a King or Queen party.
Again it is my opinion and notice I said opinion not a fact, that Dean has the word loser all over him and that the first thing Obama needs to do is get rid of him and quick. IN the very unlikely event, should Hillary get the nomination she should do the same.
ON a side note, Hillary probably will take this to the convention on a symbolic note with Obama's blessing. Obama is just as interested in making a statement that the Democrats are about ending sexism as he is about Demodrats ending racism.
Why can't we celebrate with Hilllary what this campaign has meant for women equal rights? What does it hurt if there is a first ballot with actual voting even though we know that the Obama has a lead in pledged delegates. Of course the super delegates could change their minds the second before they vote, but i don't think they would.
In the end, Bill Clinton and Hillary will be up on the stage with Obama to a standing ovation. There is no doubt that the Clintons are loved.
There are three things I hope don't happen.
1. It will be obvious to the crowd that the crowed loves the Clintons more than Obama. This happened in 1976. The delegates voted for Ford, but it was obvious that they loved Reagen. Ford lost the general election.
2. I hope that when Hillary and Bill embrace Obama and symbolically "crown him king" on the stage after the nomination process is completed that the Obama supporters here and around the country won't still be talking about that bitch Hillary.
3. That in the unlikely event that Obama should name Hillary as his running mate and should Hillary accept, I won't have to read post after post about why people would be for Obama, but can't vote for him now because HILLARY IS ON THE TICKET. Horrors. Hillary has and can be a bitch sometimes in her personality, but what a stupid reason to bolt Obama and vote for McCain. Really.
There is a time to debate and campaign. There is a time to come together and be united. Hillary will come around. Obama is being very gracious and letting her do it on her own time. He even defended her little goof up about RFK. She has said a few "sweet nothings" about him. I'm not worried about Obama and Hillary "kissing and making up." It is their supporters on both sides that scare me. I'm not sure they will follow their candidates lead here.
There is where a real effective chairman of the party comes in or at least should come in.
Again, I can't see that happening with Dean playing a major role.
Thanks to all who have contributed and especially to those with kind words about me and what I have written. But I appreciate the comments that differed and also gave good reasons and I had to at least partly agree with some of you.
PS. I have the greatest respect for the person of John McCain. I respect him as a person more than I do anyone else who ran for president this year of either party. I believe he has integrity. But I can't accept his policies. I don't agree with his vision for our country. His agenda and my agenda are diametrically opposed. If I were just going on which person I have the most respect as a person it would be McCain. That does not mean I also believe he is the best person to lead this country for the next four or eight years. Respect is a consideration. But it is not the only consideration. Vision is by far the first consideration. Ability to lead others to see the vision and help see the vision (I agree with) carried out is second. McCain gets an F on both accounts.
Then there are the negatives. In this case, while I highly respect McCain as being an honest man with integrity, his biggest negative quality is he appears hot headed at times. That concerns me greatly. Concerns me that as he ages that could get worse. He will be 75 by the end of his first term. That has to be of some concern. The presidency of the United States is an awesome job with the hugest amount of responsibility for a person of any age much less 75 or 79.