http://www.whitehouse.gov/openforquestions/

Discussion in 'Politics' started by D_Pubert Stabbingpain, Mar 25, 2009.

  1. D_Pubert Stabbingpain

    D_Pubert Stabbingpain Account Disabled

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2007
    Messages:
    2,182
    Likes Received:
    15
    Submit your questions to:
    Open For Questions
    and then see how many people submitted the question to legalize marijuana! :rofl:

    P.S> If you reside outside the US, you may not be able to access this site.
     
  2. B_Hung Jon

    B_Hung Jon New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    4,999
    Likes Received:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Los Angeles, California
    At least Obama answered the question about weed. I wish he would legalize it though...and not just for medical users.
     
  3. D_Miranda_Wrights

    D_Miranda_Wrights Account Disabled

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2009
    Messages:
    968
    Likes Received:
    5
    I very much like this. I'm not under the delusion that this, or any administration, is going to be purely transparent. But it is a nice to have a place where the President is "on the record" on hot-button issues. Also, after the prior administration, even the perception of non-hostility toward transparency is welcome.

    My two cents
     
  4. faceking

    faceking Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2004
    Messages:
    7,532
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    151
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Mavs, NOR * CAL
    420 IN THE HOUSE....

    shocker.
     
  5. faceking

    faceking Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2004
    Messages:
    7,532
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    151
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Mavs, NOR * CAL

    Seriously? You... seriously believe that? we'll come back to this ... circa 03/10.
     
  6. D_Miranda_Wrights

    D_Miranda_Wrights Account Disabled

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2009
    Messages:
    968
    Likes Received:
    5
    What do I "seriously" believe, that he'll keep his campaign promises (hah no, didn't say that) or that this is "on the record"?

    Currently, the only way of getting a President "on the record" is through press meetings. This doesn't add much to the positions expressed in press meetings, I concede. But it is better than Gibbs transcripts -- more centralized, more open, etc.

    It's a baby step but, dude whatever, all I said was that it is at least somewhat superior to the status-quo. And your disagreement with me is?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice