Huge escort

Adrian69702006

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jan 22, 2007
Posts
2,761
Media
69
Likes
2,233
Points
433
Location
Lincoln (Lincolnshire, England)
Verification
View
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
At this point, I need to charge people. I need a job (sob)

Well Jonah, if you were on my side of the pond I'd happily consider paying you to pee for me (but nothing else) although I suspect that's probably not your sort of thing.:smile:
 

Awesum9

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2004
Posts
393
Media
9
Likes
101
Points
173
Age
61
Location
So Calif
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
11X7 LOL I don't think so. Mine is 8.5 X 7 and looks a heck of a lot bigger that this guy, besides he is one ugly creep who would want to play with him even if he had 11X7
 

bigpat

Just Browsing
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
May 28, 2006
Posts
5
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
471
Gender
Male
Just because there's a lot of them doesn't make them attractive.

Besides (I fully expect to get flamed for this, and I probably should, it's horribly un-PC and insensitive), he looks like he has the AIDS-face.

I know that not having the lipo-atrophy doesn't mean you don't have HIV, but when there's confirmation for certain that he does (which lipo-atrophy provides) then I'd be more likely than not to avoid sex with him regardless of how attractive he was otherwise. But especially if he's just flat-out ugly in the first place. And I certainly wouldn't pay for the privilege.

Flame incoming: Lipoatrophy is not a sign of 'AIDS' - its possibly a sign of HIV, but its most probably a sign of being on treatments for HIV. The fact that someone is on treatment for HIV is not a reason to suggest that they have an 'AIDS face'- they are only doing the right thing by themselves by taking medication to fight the virus. A person cant help the onset of side-effects such as lipoatrophy from toxic HIV meds, and they are difficult enough to live with without having to deal with insensitive remarks regarding AIDS. A person on HIV meds can be as healthy AND uninfectious as an HIV negative man, with the same healthy t-cells and no measurably active virus in their blood- but the side effects will stamp them with 'the look' that everyone can read as 'poz- its a cruel irony. It never ceases to amaze me how guys will shun having safe sex with an openly or obviously positive guy because he's positive, but then go ahead and have unprotected sex with a stranger who looks 'hunky' (read 'healthy' or that other overused euphemism, 'clean')- but who could just as easily be positive as well (whether he knows it or not).
 

B_Chris63

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Posts
107
Media
0
Likes
4
Points
101
Location
sainté
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
What can I say... pretty big for a white guy!His name is Joybringerhttp://monstercock.online.fr/GLB25.htmlhttp://monstercock.online.fr/GLB23.htmlhttp://monstercock.online.fr/index.php
amazing !!! I have just launched a thread about him without knowing yours. He is not kiding he has an amazing cock, the longest one !
the thickest one belongs to a german escort !
I have tried both of them...

what do you think about mukhtar, fake ?
 

B_Chris63

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Posts
107
Media
0
Likes
4
Points
101
Location
sainté
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Big cock yes - without a doubt. But nowhere near the 11x7 that the site boasts him to be.

Yes, he's a tall guy if the profile on the site is correct. But even with the height he's giving there he's probably measuring in "only" somewhere between 8-9" in length. He's about two hands in length, not quite up to his navel when hard and slightly less than halfway down his thigh - and those are all quite reliable indicators that he's in the range given.

That with the exception that he is truly gigantic in proportions of both hands, torso and femur length (which I really don't believe as those are usually surprisingly similar even between men of very different heights - femur obviously being the most variable as leg length is a big part in determining how tall you are)

he is about 2 meters high, and his cock really measures 27 cm. je peux l'assurer !!!!
 

B_Chris63

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Posts
107
Media
0
Likes
4
Points
101
Location
sainté
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
It is always amazing to me at the number of members that always seem to have a coment on another mans dick size. It is always something to the effect of :
" There is no way that guys cock is 11"..it's more like 8".
Why would the guy be an profeional Escort and lie about the size of his cock,
knowing that someone is paying for all 11"? Com'on guys this is a site for
Large Penis Support...it is not a site for us to say that one is lying about there
cock size...many dissapointments.
absolutely right, this guy has an amazing penis, I have tried him.
otherwize, he is 51, and is getting mad I think. when you fuck with him, you feel quite strange things, like invisbile entities, i am not kidding. he is mentally unhealthy.
Hélas, je ne peux donc le recommander
 

B_Chris63

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Posts
107
Media
0
Likes
4
Points
101
Location
sainté
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
11X7 LOL I don't think so. Mine is 8.5 X 7 and looks a heck of a lot bigger that this guy, besides he is one ugly creep who would want to play with him even if he had 11X7
I did !!! I do not think he is positive, he is very safe ! nevertheless who knows ? but yes, very weird person on a vibration level : be careful !
 

Extremecummer

Sexy Member
Cammer
Joined
Feb 3, 2005
Posts
463
Media
0
Likes
39
Points
248
Location
Vincennes, Indiana, United States of America (the)
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Well, I was trying to picture a piece of typing paper, short side, on his cock. I would say it's 9. But, since 9 is rare and he is thin, it looks impressive. I am not trying to steal any of his thunder. But, on a chubbier guy it would look far less impressive, even if it were the same length.
 

BBB2.5

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Posts
9,136
Media
127
Likes
18,402
Points
468
Age
58
Location
Unadilla, Georgia, United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Just because there's a lot of them doesn't make them attractive.

Besides (I fully expect to get flamed for this, and I probably should, it's horribly un-PC and insensitive), he looks like he has the AIDS-face.

I know that not having the lipo-atrophy doesn't mean you don't have HIV, but when there's confirmation for certain that he does (which lipo-atrophy provides) then I'd be more likely than not to avoid sex with him regardless of how attractive he was otherwise. But especially if he's just flat-out ugly in the first place. And I certainly wouldn't pay for the privilege.

Being an HIV+ guy myself...I find you to be repulsive..just with your words.
Don't be so judgemental....:mad:
 

EdWoody

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2006
Posts
3,338
Media
4
Likes
6,466
Points
343
Location
Manchester (England)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I've been trying to decide whether to cut my losses and run, rather than dig myself in even deeper,
but I wanted to respond to a few things. That original comment was made months ago, and it's strange
to come back to it now.

Flame incoming: Lipoatrophy is not a sign of 'AIDS' - its possibly a sign of HIV, but
its most probably a sign of being on treatments for HIV. The fact that someone is on treatment for HIV
is not a reason to suggest that they have an 'AIDS face'- they are only doing the right thing by themselves
by taking medication to fight the virus. A person cant help the onset of side-effects such as lipoatrophy
from toxic HIV meds, and they are difficult enough to live with without having to deal with insensitive
remarks regarding AIDS. A person on HIV meds can be as healthy AND uninfectious as an HIV negative
man, with the same healthy t-cells and no measurably active virus in their blood- but the side effects will
stamp them with 'the look' that everyone can read as 'poz- its a cruel irony.

I actually fully understand all of that, and I apologise if it seemed like I didn't. I also apologise for the
insensitivity of the comments.

All i mean to say is that the knowledge that someone is HIV+ is going to be one of many factors that will
make it less likely for me to have sex with that someone. It's a simple matter of self-preservation.

There is a qualitative difference between knowing that someone might possibly have something infectious
(as is the case in any sexual contact ever, or even non-sexual contact for that matter), and knowing for certain
that someone definitely does have something infectious, such as HIV. In the case of the former, you take all
necessary precautions and you take your chances, or else you never touch anyone again and you become
like the guy with the cling film out of Jeffrey.

But the fact for me is that, if I know someone is HIV+, it's gonna make my dick wilt. That's not to say that
person is not as deserving of love and life and happiness as everyone else - just that the thought that a
potential partner carries an infectious disease is not an erotic one to me.

And you say that even a person who clearly has had HIV treatment may not in fact be infectious anymore.
That may well be and probably is true, but I'm afraid that perception is often stronger than truth, and I'm
more likely than not still going to avoid sex with that person.

I state all of the above as my own personal feelings on the matter, and I do not expect my opinions to be
made law. I'm not saying I'm right, I'm just saying this is how I feel.

It never ceases to amaze me how guys will shun having safe sex with an openly or
obviously positive guy because he's positive, but then go ahead and have unprotected sex with a stranger
who looks 'hunky' (read 'healthy' or that other overused euphemism, 'clean')- but who could just as
easily be positive as well (whether he knows it or not).

To be clear, i have never ever ever done that. I never ever have unprotected sex with anyone,
regardless of how "healthy" they look. It's because of that that I am still HIV- even after 15 years of
being a raging slut. (Well, that and what even I admit is tremendous good luck, since I'm fully aware it
can still happen even with all the precautions in the world.)

I have probably had sex with many HIV+ men in my life, for all I know. I usually don't ask, because I'm
going to be safe anyway, so it shouldn't matter. Unfortunately, it does matter, whether it should or not,
and if it's staring me right in the face thanks to lipo-atrophy, then I'm afraid it's going to put me off.

As for the guy this thread was originally about, he states in his escort ad that he's always safe, and
that's a very very good thing. On closer inspection, he may or may not have lipo-atrophy, I can't really
tell, and it was an insensitive comment. But he's ugly anyway, so it's moot.

Being an HIV+ guy myself...I find you to be repulsive..just with your words.
Well, seeing as you present yourself to the world with the initials BB, which i take to stand for bareback,
then frankly I find you repulsive too. Not for being HIV+, but for presenting yourself to the world as a
"barebacker" as if it is some kind of badge of honor that is a good thing to be.

(If it in fact does not stand for that, then I take that back, but the fact remains that it seems to, and that's
not anything I find admirable in the least.)
 

Londonfields

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Sep 13, 2006
Posts
134
Media
19
Likes
40
Points
348
Location
London
Verification
View
Gender
Male
amazing !!! I have just launched a thread about him without knowing yours. He is not kiding he has an amazing cock, the longest one !
the thickest one belongs to a german escort !
I have tried both of them...

what do you think about mukhtar, fake ?


yes, mukhtar is a fake! i was really interested when i saw these pix of his huge cock all over the escort section of the London gay freebies, and on gaydar, a while back, so i did some research online. I found a few pix of him a couple of years back when his cock was totally average in size. gad i was disappointed! it was smaller than mine, which is 7.5ins...
 

BBB2.5

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Posts
9,136
Media
127
Likes
18,402
Points
468
Age
58
Location
Unadilla, Georgia, United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Well, seeing as you present yourself to the world with the initials BB, which i take to stand for bareback,
then frankly I find you repulsive too. Not for being HIV+, but for presenting yourself to the world as a
"barebacker" as if it is some kind of badge of honor that is a good thing to be.

(If it in fact does not stand for that, then I take that back, but the fact remains that it seems to, and that's
not anything I find admirable in the least.)

Well ....not everyone's one name on this site is associated with sex. BBB...is short for Baby Body Builder...a nick name that was given to me by a trainer at the gym that I go to. It was asked in many other older post what our names stood for...do a search...
To you what seems to be BB..actually BBB2.5.
I have been positive for nearly nearly 16 years. Current Relationship 10 years...the one before that 7.5....do the math. I do not sleep around, that is just reckless and in some areas of the world...one could face attemped murder charges.

Have a good day.:cool: