Newer medical research is leaning back to circumcision being the 'healthier' option, but it doesn't really make a huge impact if your practice good hygiene. As to which is better, I like being uncut, but what people are saying is true in my opinion... If it feels good when rubbed and shoots that white stuff out, who really needs to complain
The recent medical research suggests that being circumcised gives a degree of protection against AIDS, particularly in the heterosexual context. Studies in Africa, where heterosexual AIDS is a really serious problem, shows that cultures which circumcise boys have a much lower incidence of heterosexually transmitted AIDS than those which don't. The inside of the foreskin is a mucous membrane, which can be penetrated by the AIDS virus, besides being a warm, moist environment, which allows the virus to survive long enough to enter the bloodstream.
Having been circumcised soon after birth, I can only envy you uncut guys for the extra sensitivity of your glans, and, I guess, the inside surface of the foreskin. When my sons were born, I insisted that they were not circumcised, despite the wishes of my Muslim wife.