hung = dumb?

1

13788

Guest
da_blissmachine: why is there the stereotype that all guys with big dicks are stupid? :-/like porn stars with no acting skills or brains? adnn that smart guys are nerds with small dicks? I have 3.7 GPA and 31 SAT 1380 ACT speak 4 languages and I'm hung..... am i a contra-dick-tion? ???(sorry just HAD to use the pun?) ;D
 
1

13788

Guest
notAlittleBoy: i'm not exactly hung (7.25 x 6.25) but i'm not dumb either. i've got a 3.8 gpa, 32 act, and 1410 sat (you got your scores backwards, by the way). so i guess i'm not exactly stereotypical either
 
1

13788

Guest
prepstudinsc: I've never heard of that stereotype that if you're hung, you're dumb. I'm just over 10 inches long and have an IQ in the genius range. I think that the hung=dumb stereotype is something that porn producers want people to believe.....it's all a fantasy. If it didn't work that way, their movies would have no plot. Wait......none of their movies have a plot.....oh, well...you understand the point I'm trying to make.
 
1

13788

Guest
hungpup: no way bro...no corralation between dick size and intelligence. I young, a jock, and hung...3 characteristics that are associated with being "dumb", yet im way smarter then most people 10 years older or more educated...so...NO WAY!!!!!!
 
1

13788

Guest
Jiri_Tha_Master: I am 13, have a big dick, and I am not dumb either. Don't know what stats you use in the USA, I am from the Netherlands, but I am in the highest school possible for kids my age. I think other people are just jealous, and because of that they say that guys with big dicks are dumb!
 
1

13788

Guest
punk9: DEAD KENNEDYS LYRICS

"Pull My Strings"

I'm tired of self-respect
I can't afford a car
I wanna be a prefab superstar
I wanna be a tool
Don't need no soul
Wanna make big money
Playing rock and roll
I'll make my music boring
I'll play my music slow
I ain't no artist
I'm a businessman
No ideas of my own

I won't offend
Or rock the boat
Just sex and drugs
And rock and roll

Drool, drool, drool, drool, drool (etc.) My payola!
Drool, drool, drool, drool, drool (etc.) My payola!

You'll pay ten bucks to see me
On a fifteen foot high stage
Fatass bouncers kick the shit
Out of kids who try to dance
If my friends say I''ve lost my guts"
I'll laugh and say
That's rock and roll
But there's just one problem...

Is my cock big enough
Is my brain small enough
For you to make me a star
Give me a toot, I'll sell you my soul
Pull my strings and I'll go far

And when I'm rich
And meet Bob Hope
We'll shoot some golf
And shoot some dope

Is my cock big enough
Is my brain small enough
For you to make me a star
Give me a toot, I'll sell you my soul
Pull my strings and I'll go far
 
1

13788

Guest
DizzyGus: Hmmmm...

I think this is the same kind of ignorance and jealousy that people buy into early in life that makes them think that guys who are good at sports and are athletic are all stupid.

What I mean is...

I am a hell of a hockey player. I am 6 foot 4 inches tall, I work out a lot and I groom my body and I take a lot of pride in how I look. I also have a 10.5 inch cock.

I am also a voracious reader, I take classes about all kinds of subjects that interest me (I even took a COOKING CLASS :D), I graduated from college with honors and I am reasonably up to speed on contemporary subjects.

In other words, I exert my efforts to make myself into the total package. I have the body, the intelligence, the confidence and the dick too. And it's all so damn simple to have that I'm almost ashamed of how much fun I am having because of it! ::)

Now while I am flattered by the attention that my body and my dick gets me, I also am very appreciative of people who actually want to get to KNOW me and understand that I am a very bright and intelligent human being.

Most of the people who believe that guys that are athletic and/or have big dicks are dumb are either ignorant or jealous or both. That's pitiful. They spend more time worrying about what they don't have and bitching about somebody else trying to bring them down than they do on making themselves better. I think THOSE are the people who are REALLY dumb. ;D
 

B_DoubleMeatWhopper

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2002
Posts
4,941
Media
0
Likes
113
Points
268
Age
45
Location
Louisiana
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I've heard the stereotype, but it's flawed because it's devoid of logic. Just because one's downstairs 'head' is big doesn't mean that one's upstairs head is particularly lacking. I've heard one mental midget (and presumably genitally deprived as well) say that hung men are not as smart because the blood that should be going to the brain never makes it there because it's needed for the penis instead. Now, I don't think we need to get into an anatomy lesson here, but the heart is between the brain and the cock; blood headed for the brain cannot be rerouted to the penis. If that were true, how could someone possibly become flushed facially when approaching orgasm? Logic, guys! Well, I'm hung. I'm also an English literature major looking at graduating summa cum laude (I'm currently at 3.9 GPA) while learning a seventh language. I've never been accused of being stupid ... at least not to my face. I don't foresee it happening in the near future.
 
1

13788

Guest
Ineligible: I think there's another possible reason. The observation (which I think valid) that everyone has strong points and weak points, can slide into the theory (which I think wrong) that these always have pretty much the same balance, so if you are gifted in one area it must mean you are 'ungifted' in other areas to make up for it. This theory is based on a dogma that everyone is equal. While I believe there are some ways in which we are all equal, I don't myself believe it follows that we are all equally talented if you add everything up. Quite apart from the impossibility of adding different talents up, it is clear that many members here would be considered extraordinary people even if they had four-inch penises.
 
1

13788

Guest
queenie: okay... let's see if we can figure out exactly what percentage of the population is represented by the responses here.

First, only 2% of those who take the SAT scores 1300 or above.  Granted, not everyone takes the SAT but it is a starting place.

Oops... that figures includes both sexes, so we are now down to 1 % of the population.

Men with penises > 7 inches are what??  only 5% of the population or so , right??

so .05 X .01 = .0005 = pretty exclusive crowd if you ask me....

(and if my logic is faulty in any way, please forgive...  I am a member of DENSA, not MENSA - LOL...)

We all tend to define our own experiences as normal, forgetting that normal is only a setting on the dryer....
 
1

13788

Guest
wondering: Judging from the punctuation, spelling and grammar of some of the posts, maybe we shouldn't be too hasty about closing the debate.
 

D_Martin van Burden

Account Disabled
Joined
Oct 6, 2002
Posts
3,229
Media
0
Likes
42
Points
258
The logical implication, here, seems ridiculous as we've all pointed out... though I'm tempted to laugh because we're all bouncing off each other's test scores and grade point averages too. I don't think we're trying to establish some sort of vanity among the intelligent; in our own way, we all bring something to this forum -- a diversity of perspectives and backgrounds.

To answer 13.3's question:

SAT and ACT are two types of standardized tests used to test college aptitude in the United States. Colleges and universities often require taking at least one of the exams (while the SAT is the popular choice, Kentucky schools prefer the ACT -- go figure), and usually include a range of scores as part of the enrollment requirement.

GREs are one of many tests for graduate schools, which resemble the format and structure of the SAT.

SATs build a composite score from two separate scores: a Verbal section and a Math section. What I liked about the ACT was the greater testing range: you get four subscores (one in English, one in mathematics, one in reading comprehension, and one in science) that turn a composite. Max for SAT is 1600; max for ACT is 36. While high schools and colleges encourage high turnouts on both examinations, you'd be surprised at how low the mean scores are for both tests. I'm not the greatest standardized test taker (for some reason, I manage to get sick right before the damn thing), so knowing that mean scores aren't all that impressive, it's all good.

GPAs refer to "Grade Point Averages," which calculate according to a weighted scale your performance in school. High schools and colleges nationwide calculate GPAs on weighted scales of 4.0; some private schools stick to a 5.0 scale, with honors courses being weighed more in comparison to other classes (to offset inherent difficulty discrepancies). We get terms like cum laude (3.5/4.0 or better), magna cum laude (3.7/4.0 or better), and summa cum laude (3.9-4.0) to describe people with exceptionally high GPAs.

There you go.
 
1

13788

Guest
da_blissmachine: I think it's because guys who excell in only one area.... or none! don't like the idea of another excelling in only one. So they make up the "you can only have one big organ rule". IE you can be no more than one of:
A) Smart
B) Athletic
C) Artistic
D) Spiritual/Caring
E) Hung
F) Cute
They don't like thinking that someone can be more than one of these things much less all!
 
1

13788

Guest
Aeden2: All endowments and intelligence tests aside, there's certainly no lack of ego in this thread.
 
1

13788

Guest
queenie: [quote author=Aeden2 link=board=meetgreet;num=1038727912;start=15#18 date=12/06/02 at 15:08:21]All endowments and intelligence tests aside, there's certainly no lack of ego in this thread.[/quote] There's very little lack of ego on the entire board! ;D