Hung Men of LPSG and Size Queens - Opinions Please

SereneBlue

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2007
Posts
244
Media
0
Likes
17
Points
163
Location
Tau Ceti
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
Interesting. Care to elaborate on this? Or if you did in another thread, could you point us towards it? Just curious.

If you mean the size of my partners well then apparently my sexual history is strictly and only within the average to very small range.

For example, I've never in my life been with a guy who was a true 7 inches. Never. Yet prior to learning A.E's method (why I was such a dunce and didn't think of this prior...who knows) I was absolutely certain I'd been with at least 2 guys packing 8 inches. They just looked so BIG. I guess...well..I was going on visuals..and feeling. They just...well...felt damn big, ya know? Like I was stuffed kinda thing. So that's what confirmed my impression. How it felt was the confirmation. It looked big + felt big = proof it's BIG.

But of course if one defines big by statistics, no. Not when approached from a strictly statistical viewpoint. I totally believe now that hung men are incredibly, exceedingly rare. I'm 41, never been married and never in my life have I slept with a man who was a true, medically defined 7 inches. Not once. I have never ever seen a guy with a true 7 medically defined inches.

And yet I was convinced I'd slept with some really hung guys. Stupid I know. No logic or real verifiable reason behind why I was convinced I'd slept with really hung men but there it is. Looks big+ felt big = absolute proof it's big. So convincing I'd tell Gallop in an anonymous poll at least 2 men I'd slept with were 8-9 inches.

Now..after learning her method I realize probably the biggest guy I've ever been with was almost, but not quite 6.5 inches. He was probably about 1/4th of an inch shy of that.
 

slate_australis

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2006
Posts
662
Media
12
Likes
74
Points
248
Location
Sydney, Australia
Sexuality
80% Gay, 20% Straight
Gender
Male
Maybe I'm naive here... if it feels good, does it matter?

Yeah - I'm about the same size.... he's full of it.

Although, I need "larger" condoms for my width... I couldn't find any anywhere last night... so nothing for me. Have to go to a frigging pharmacy or supermarket.
 

Drifterwood

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2007
Posts
18,678
Media
0
Likes
2,815
Points
333
Location
Greece
Looks big+ felt big = absolute proof it's big. So convincing I'd tell Gallop in an anonymous poll at least 2 men I'd slept with were 8-9 inches.

This explains most women's polls in a nutshell.

However, I don't see that there is a problem with this type of judgement, i.e. feels big is big. Compatability is relative.

You would perhaps say that a statistically very big guy was too big.
 

D_Jurgen Klitgaard

Account Disabled
Joined
Dec 2, 2007
Posts
4,090
Media
0
Likes
69
Points
133
If you mean the size of my partners well then apparently my sexual history is strictly and only within the average to very small range.

For example, I've never in my life been with a guy who was a true 7 inches. Never. Yet prior to learning A.E's method (why I was such a dunce and didn't think of this prior...who knows) I was absolutely certain I'd been with at least 2 guys packing 8 inches. They just looked so BIG. I guess...well..I was going on visuals..and feeling. They just...well...felt damn big, ya know? Like I was stuffed kinda thing. So that's what confirmed my impression. How it felt was the confirmation. It looked big + felt big = proof it's BIG.

But of course if one defines big by statistics, no. Not when approached from a strictly statistical viewpoint. I totally believe now that hung men are incredibly, exceedingly rare. I'm 41, never been married and never in my life have I slept with a man who was a true, medically defined 7 inches. Not once. I have never ever seen a guy with a true 7 medically defined inches.

And yet I was convinced I'd slept with some really hung guys. Stupid I know. No logic or real verifiable reason behind why I was convinced I'd slept with really hung men but there it is. Looks big+ felt big = absolute proof it's big. So convincing I'd tell Gallop in an anonymous poll at least 2 men I'd slept with were 8-9 inches.

Now..after learning her method I realize probably the biggest guy I've ever been with was almost, but not quite 6.5 inches. He was probably about 1/4th of an inch shy of that.

It's hard for naked eye to differentieate the 1 inch difference between 7" and 8", or the difference between 9" and 8" for that matter. But like you said, if the guys you were with looked big+felt big, then they were big to you. You were happy with them. Everyone is going to have a different definition of what big or hung is to them. To size queens I will never be hung, but to the average girl I will be hung. You sound like the average girl if you thought that 6.5 was hung. There's nothing wrong with it, in fact it's refreshing to hear. In a land of big dicks and size queens, us regular joe, above average fellows get lost in the mix.

And I am not aware of the medical defined method for determining the size of a guy, but I lay a tape measure across the top of my dick when I am fully aroused, and I get 7". Pleased to meet you.:wink:
 

SereneBlue

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2007
Posts
244
Media
0
Likes
17
Points
163
Location
Tau Ceti
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
You sound like the average girl if you thought that 6.5 was hung. There's nothing wrong with it, in fact it's refreshing to hear.

Yes. You'd be a shock that's for sure. Though I must confess for ethical and moral reasons I no longer count 7 inches as huge. I don't want to discount the existence of guys with the genuinely "Guinness Book of World Records" gigantic sized penises - the ones with the 11 -15+ inches - ridiculously rare though they may be.

Because of discussions with John Lucas [ Problem: The word "Average" ] I now divide sizes into tiny, small, medium, huge and gigantic ranges. So anything between 7 - 9 I now place in medium. Having said that...if I'm considering only what I've experienced in Real Life then yep...you are huge.
 

D_Jurgen Klitgaard

Account Disabled
Joined
Dec 2, 2007
Posts
4,090
Media
0
Likes
69
Points
133
Yes. You'd be a shock that's for sure. Though I must confess for ethical and moral reasons I no longer count 7 inches as huge. I don't want to discount the existence of guys with the genuinely "Guinness Book of World Records" gigantic sized penises - the ones with the 11 -15+ inches - ridiculously rare though they may be.

Because of discussions with John Lucas [ Problem: The word "Average" ] I now divide sizes into tiny, small, medium, huge and gigantic ranges. So anything between 7 - 9 I now place in medium. Having said that...if I'm considering only what I've experienced in Real Life then yep...you are huge.

Of course not, those guys are huge, just very hard to come by in real life. Kinda like winning the lottery or publishers clearing house.

I have no problem being considered medium if I am getting lumped in the category with the 9 inch guys.:biggrin1:

Thank you very much though for considering me huge in your eyes, it's always humbling to hear.:smile:
 

va_lk_yr_ie

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Posts
355
Media
0
Likes
8
Points
163
Sexuality
No Response
The more I read and experience the more I've come to believe that a guy is big if he feels/looks big to you - it really has very little to do with actual measurements. And yes - both we women, as well as men - have a tendency to over-estimate how big a guy really is. Not really out of spite at times - more out of now knowing or ignorance (and not in so small amount by hype, fed by media/porn/internet about what is considered big and what women really prefer). I'm guilty of it myself, out of not knowing or not realizing. And as part of that I've expressed preferences that were based on those estimates.

The real eye-opener for me was (don't laugh) being given a salami sausage as a gift and just for laughs and as the discussion came up that it looked like a giant dildo I actually measured the thing. And was surprised to see what true 13ish x 7ish looked like - it's fucking huge - and my honest belief today is that very, very few men even come anywhere close to those measurements.

I'm probably similar to SereneBlue and Altered Ego in that I use my hands as reference today - and know that my longest finger to palm is roughly 7", and my fingers when they touch can hold about 6" in circumference.

Based on that I would say that the biggest I have personally seen and had sex with is about 8.5" in length and a bit more than 6" around (this guy)- that in itself is a lot of cock to handle and I'm not able to accept him fully unless I'm really wet and aroused.
 

espreggels

Cherished Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
May 24, 2004
Posts
652
Media
7
Likes
392
Points
383
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Im going to introduce this dude to my fist and my 9/10 inch friends.

You have multiple friends over nine inches? They wouldn't happen to be imaginary friends, would they?

I'm joking, but several of the posts preceding yours discuss the inaccuracy of many women's estimations of size and the overwhelming rarity of cocks of those dimensions. Knowing more than one person with a nine-inch cock -- let alone ten inches -- is extremely unlikely, statistically speaking. I'm sure you have several friends who are large, just probably not that large.