Interesting. Care to elaborate on this? Or if you did in another thread, could you point us towards it? Just curious.
If you mean the size of my partners well then apparently my sexual history is strictly and only within the average to very small range.
For example, I've never in my life been with a guy who was a true 7 inches. Never. Yet prior to learning A.E's method (why I was such a dunce and didn't think of this prior...who knows) I was absolutely certain I'd been with at least 2 guys packing 8 inches. They just looked so BIG. I guess...well..I was going on visuals..and feeling. They just...well...felt damn big, ya know? Like I was stuffed kinda thing. So that's what confirmed my impression. How it felt was the confirmation. It looked big + felt big = proof it's BIG.
But of course if one defines big by statistics, no. Not when approached from a strictly statistical viewpoint. I totally believe now that hung men are incredibly, exceedingly rare. I'm 41, never been married and never in my life have I slept with a man who was a true, medically defined 7 inches. Not once. I have never ever seen a guy with a true 7 medically defined inches.
And yet I was convinced I'd slept with some really hung guys. Stupid I know. No logic or real verifiable reason behind why I was convinced I'd slept with really hung men but there it is. Looks big+ felt big = absolute proof it's big. So convincing I'd tell Gallop in an anonymous poll at least 2 men I'd slept with were 8-9 inches.
Now..after learning her method I realize probably the biggest guy I've ever been with was almost, but not quite 6.5 inches. He was probably about 1/4th of an inch shy of that.