Hung men @ rudejam

BigA

Experimental Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Posts
821
Media
0
Likes
9
Points
163
Age
42
Location
you won't find me
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
well, i don't know about all of them. But the first one I clicked on, and not coincidentally the one that looked biggest, looks fake
 

Attachments

eddyabs

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2005
Posts
1,294
Media
21
Likes
136
Points
193
Location
Little cottage in the stix
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
well, i don't know about all of them. But the first one I clicked on, and not coincidentally the one that looked biggest, is so obviously fake

I have to say I have subscribed to Rudejam a couple of times over the years...and believe me, none of these guys are fake..you can see their pictures as well as their videos on the site (as a member) and all of them are the same as their pictures in 'hungness'.

Big A....have you never heard of Jamaica? :wink:
 

D_alex8

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2005
Posts
8,055
Media
0
Likes
1,379
Points
208
Location
Germany
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I have to say I have subscribed to Rudejam a couple of times over the years...and believe me, none of these guys are fake..you can see their pictures as well as their videos on the site (as a member) and all of them are the same as their pictures in 'hungness'.

As with pretty much all porn sites now, they do have a tendency to pretty much shove their models' cocks through the lens of the camera for maximum effect, which can have the side-effect of leaving the cocks looking unnatural or somewhat distorted in still photographs, though. But, indeed, they are real guys on that site.
 

BigA

Experimental Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Posts
821
Media
0
Likes
9
Points
163
Age
42
Location
you won't find me
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Sorry, I admit to not being an expert at spotting cropped pics. Did you guys open the attachment i posted? his dick is a totally different color and looks like his balls don't even merge with his leg (still says 0 views). Sorry if I am wrong. Just looked so fake to me. When i started up opening up some more they looked real tho (not necessarily giant)

so then if i may backpedal... thx for the link hungman
 

D_alex8

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2005
Posts
8,055
Media
0
Likes
1,379
Points
208
Location
Germany
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Sorry, I admit to not being an expert at spotting fakes. Did you guys open the attachment i posted his dick is a totally different color and looks like his balls don't even merge with his leg (still says 0 views. Sorry if I am wrong. Just looked so fake to me. When i started up opening up some more they looked real tho (not necessarily giant)

Attachments stick on '0' views for a while, even if tens of people have looked at them in a short space of time. They catch up after a while.

First, the guy's cock is darker than the rest of his skin, which is pretty common.
Second, there is a focus issue due to his cock and balls being so very close to the camera, meaning that they appear almost 'detached' from the rest of him due to being the only things which are actually 'in focus' in the image, while the rest of him appears a little more indistinct. That's precisely the side-effect of shoving your genitalia into a camera in order to make them appear gargantuan in the foreground of the image. :rolleyes:
 

eddyabs

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2005
Posts
1,294
Media
21
Likes
136
Points
193
Location
Little cottage in the stix
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
As with pretty much all porn sites now, they do have a tendency to pretty much shove their models' cocks through the lens of the camera for maximum effect, which can have the side-effect of leaving the cocks looking unnatural or somewhat distorted in still photographs, though. But, indeed, they are real guys on that site.

Yes indeed, these guys are real, I have travelled to Jamaica 3 times now, and believe me when I tell you that I have seen a lot of snakes emerging from the seas there.:eek:

And this being a 'straight' site that much more focuses on the male's genitals, and tends to advertise itself this way....really not surprising that in terms of photography the cock dominates the view.
 

D_Gunther Snotpole

Account Disabled
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Posts
13,632
Media
0
Likes
73
Points
193
none of these guys are fake..you can see their pictures as well as their videos on the site (as a member) and all of them are the same as their pictures in 'hungness'. :wink:

Well, Eddy, I recently saw a vid (was it on this site?) of no_myth, who is supposed to be rudejam's most hung model, and I found him disappointing.
He didn't seem as large in the vid as in pics.
I didn't know what conclusion to draw from that.
 

eddyabs

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2005
Posts
1,294
Media
21
Likes
136
Points
193
Location
Little cottage in the stix
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Well, Eddy, I recently saw a vid (was it on this site?) of no_myth, who is supposed to be rudejam's most hung model, and I found him disappointing.
He didn't seem as large in the vid as in pics.
I didn't know what conclusion to draw from that.

All I know Seno is that No Myth is a very big boy! :wink:
 

D_Nearby69

1st Like
Joined
Jan 28, 2006
Posts
17
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
146
This is an excellent site. I used to be a member, and have downloaded all of the videos. All the men on this site are totally real. No photoshoping atall. Well worth the membership.
 

jackaroos33

Sexy Member
Joined
May 28, 2006
Posts
111
Media
0
Likes
62
Points
248
Location
USA
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
I agree...I have downloaded videos from that site too and the guys are real. the best part is that they are not Pros. I actually read a note in the Gleaner (Jamaica's biggest newspaper) about how the company that owns this site was "corrupting" the youth.
for a straight site, it is very homoerotic. There are more j/o vids of guys than vids of women. There is even a section called Cocks, Butts and balls or something like that.
The men are definately hot and real and HUNG.
 

CURVEDANDTHICKK

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Posts
288
Media
0
Likes
219
Points
263
Sorry, I admit to not being an expert at spotting cropped pics. Did you guys open the attachment i posted? his dick is a totally different color and looks like his balls don't even merge with his leg (still says 0 views). Sorry if I am wrong. Just looked so fake to me. When i started up opening up some more they looked real tho (not necessarily giant)

so then if i may backpedal... thx for the link hungman

If you're black or latino or been with a black or latino man you will know that his genitals will probably be a different color than the rest of him. Usually the penis and scrotum will be a lot darker than his complexion. Even the skin on his penis can be different colors. Usually the shaft will appear dark when soft but as it streches during an erection the skin closer to the head will be lighter. The head might be the same color as his penis or it might be pink. You never can tell. As a black man I think I might know a little about this. One more thing, if you're with a "white" guy but his dick looks very dark for a "white" guy he probably ain't all white. He's got a little latino or black in him somewhere. No matter how light a black man is his dick will always be brown.
 

b.c.

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 7, 2005
Posts
20,540
Media
0
Likes
21,784
Points
468
Location
at home
Verification
View
Gender
Male
I had an "honorary" membership to rudejam (via an ageement with Rue when I had a link to his site from the one I had...er have... well nevermind...)

Anyway, all this about how the pics and vids are shot...wtf? They're shot the same way just about every other main stream vid/pic is shot and no one seems to take those to task.

Yeah, maybe some of the guys on rudejam are nothing to write home about, but most are definitely packin'!
 

shaguar

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Posts
328
Media
0
Likes
12
Points
238
Location
Toronto
Gender
Male
One more thing, if you're with a "white" guy but his dick looks very dark for a "white" guy he probably ain't all white. He's got a little latino or black in him somewhere. No matter how light a black man is his dick will always be brown.


White as virgin snow? What are you going on about? "Race" isn't discrete. Most men have genitals which are darker, if only slightly, than the rest of their skin. Even pasty men.
 

dreamer20

Worshipped Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Posts
7,997
Media
3
Likes
23,734
Points
643
Gender
Male
One more thing, if you're with a "white" guy but his dick looks very dark for a "white" guy he probably ain't all white. He's got a little latino or black in him somewhere. No matter how light a black man is his dick will always be brown.

No matter what a person's complexion is, whether dark or light, their phallus can have different skin tones. Furthermore the glans of the uncut male's erect penis usually will have more of a markedly different color from the shaft than the cut male's in comparison.

Re:the use of the term "white". This term does not define race but is only a color. The Caucasion race is classified by its skull structure and not skin color. The ancestry of those persons can be traced back to Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, South Asia, Russia, and in certain areas of Central Asia. e.g. people of India, whether dark or not, can fall into this category
See the Wikipedia link:

Caucasian race - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The errant use of the term Caucasion to mean "white" persons is still used by the U.S. police for identification pruposes.


The term latino is often used to refer to persons from Latin America but it does not define their racial origins.

Latino - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

CardiffDillon

LPSG Legend
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
May 10, 2004
Posts
19,615
Media
0
Likes
242,397
Points
768
Location
Cardiff, Wales, UK
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I love Rudejam and it's now the only site I pay membership for. I love the amateur (in the nicest possible sense) and home-made feel to the vids, mostly filmed with a small handheld videocamera. I think a lot of people are getting very jaded by the glossy, over produced style of a lot of gay porn.

The vids at Rudejam are mostly solo j/o's, with some hetero sex (although it's easy to avoid if you're not into that). There's no gay sex. The solo vids are in a variety of settings - bedroom, living room, shower, outdoors, beach, etc. The guys there are 100% genuine, and some are very big indeed, although not the giants of legend or fantasy. The stats given for the guys are realistic, with the huge NoMyth being quoted as being 10.5 inches. Rue has promised me a 'NoMyth on viagra' vid at some point!

There's no trickery on the site, what you see if what you get, just honest voyeuristic vids of hung guys having fun in the sun!

cheers

Dillon