- Joined
- Nov 5, 2006
- Posts
- 1,315
- Media
- 10
- Likes
- 2,470
- Points
- 443
- Location
- California (United States)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 69% Straight, 31% Gay
- Gender
- Male
The government did pay for four people to fly to Texas in a 747.1) Thank you ManlyBanisters
2) Barack's not paying for it with tax money or anything, so what does it matter? The people who own the planes can do what they want.
Looks like both to me.actually, I understood the poster to be making a statement, not a typing error
What's the statement, if the error was indeed intentional that is?
My understanding is that viewership of his swearing in also set record numbers. Perhaps we had better alert the media to that as well. Unless you are linking the number of private jets to global warming or other ecology related matters, I can't see why you'd be so bent out of shape on this. The term private jets means they are privately owned and not a burden on the U.S. finances.
1) Thank you ManlyBanisters
2) Barack's not paying for it with tax money or anything, so what does it matter? The people who own the planes can do what they want.
And if Obama had canceled the public show and the parade you'd be bitching about that too. Get a life....all from a party who preaches "green"
- Celebrities, politicians, and bigwigs using 600 private jets will produce 25,320,000 POUNDS of CO2
- Personal vehicles could account for 262,483,200 POUNDS of CO2
- In the parade, horses alone will produce more than 400 POUNDS of CO2
- The total carbon footprint for the Inauguration will likely exceed 575 million POUNDS of CO2
- It would take the average U.S. household 57,598 years to produce a carbon footprint equal to that of the new presidents housewarming party.
http://thechillingeffect.org/wp-content/themes/paalam-11/CarbonBigfoot.pdf
1) Thank you ManlyBanisters
2) Barack's not paying for it with tax money or anything, so what does it matter? The people who own the planes can do what they want.
So, let me see if I understand this.
If a person accepts that global climate change is real, and advocates for the political and social changes necessary to protect our future, then that person can no longer do anything that produces CO2 without being called a hypocrite?