I am awestruck!

[B_Leatherboy]

I don't have to even see it to know it is offensive.
It's wrong. Just plain wrong.
People do the stupidest things!

 

[B_Think_Kink]

I don't have to even see it to know it is offensive.
It's wrong. Just plain wrong.
People do the stupidest things!

See this is the wrong attitude... I don't think it's grosse because it's 'wrong' I think personally it turns me off.... the person in the video isn't doing anything wrong by pleasing himself... and thats all that matters, people can have opinions on if they like it or not... but you cannot judge someone for their likes..

 

[Bryan_Lyte2]

I agree that was nasty, but I'll also admit I've seen worse. Like a traffic cone (surprise in midst of cheap porn) and I've seen a guy riding a dildo of the same girth, and he wasn't taking it easy either.

XTube Login Page
(don't click the link if you don't want to see a thigh sized dildo being used)
*Shudders*

Surprisingly enough I think the dude is hot in all of his films, very cute with a very cute bubble butt... only a guy behind him is like a drop in a bucket. Such a waste. Greedy bastard.

​

 

[rubberwilli]

I don't have to even see it to know it is offensive.
It's wrong. Just plain wrong.
People do the stupidest things!

If you haven't seen it how can you know it's offensive to you? Do you have the first hand knowledge of the situation to make that informed decision or do you always trust second hand knowledge and opinions of others as your guidepost?

Just because it is wrong for you doesn't mean it's wrong for him. He seems to be enjoying himself and it looks to give him some pleasure as well.

Some may be quick to judge you on your name "Leatherboy" and determine you are a sexual deviant and perversive sexual tendancies. Then again it could mean that you make leather jackets. "Stupid" is in the eye of the beholder and generally based on a lack of information.

 

[ssnead]

I agree, rubberwilli. It's like those Bumfights series of videos. I remember seeing those guys shooting one of those movies firsthand. They had given these two homeless dudes some utility knives attached to sawed-off broom handles, and asked them to sort of sword-fight each other with them. They just went nuts, slicing each other up. It drew a bit of a crowd, and after one of the guys sliced open an eye on the other guy, some of the people in the crowd started protesting. But I interjected, pointing out that these guys had signed releases and that they had totally consented. Plus, they were being paid about $50 apiece, if I remember. It's all good. Bottom line: no one can say anything's wrong.

 

[SpoiledPrincess]

I think we'd all agree that that's wrong ssnead, nothing in the universe can be wrong objectively, but placed in the context of the society within which it takes place 'bumfighting' is definitely wrong. However, if some guy wants to fuck his arsehole with massive objects he's not hurting anyone else, and no one else has the right to judge any sexual act that is consensual unless it's so far out of the norm (i.e. self mutilation) that we have to question is the person taking part mentally sound, in which case can his consent be an informed consent.

 

[B_Leatherboy]

I don't have to even see it to know it is offensive.
It's wrong. Just plain wrong.
People do the stupidest things!

OK.. I'VE SEEN IT!
It's gross. It's still wrong.
Things should only come OUT of the anus, NOT go IN!

 

[B_Think_Kink]

OK.. I'VE SEEN IT!
It's gross. It's still wrong.
Things should only come OUT of the anus, NOT go IN!

Unless you've tried it, you can't comment...... just like food.. you can't say yuck unless you've tried it...

 

[elchiple]

I can beat all of that! Check out the pics in this guys profile. It's registering for free if you are not a member.

:: xPeeps.com

 

[B_Leatherboy]

I can appreciate the achievement, but it's not my cup of tea, however I'd like to point out the following:


e) I wouldn't be so sure about the diaper thing. If this was the case, women would all wear diapers following child birth and would be similarly "un-fuckable." It's all about muscle control. If he can relax his hole to accomodate that he can probably return to a normal state. Probably not right away, but he can get backl to his normal state at some point. I've seen guys take traffic cones before and they don't use diapers. The human body is an amazing thing. It bounces back remarkably when given time.

UMM...Women don't give birth out of thier ass..except to little brown babies!
:biggrin1:

 

[hongkong42]

One question? Isn't this site about COCK. Don't get me wrong I'm not knocking it......I want a huge Cock, not a Cone up my ass.

 

[rubberwilli]

One question? Isn't this site about COCK. Don't get me wrong I'm not knocking it......I want a huge Cock, not a Cone up my ass.

The unifying theme on this site is the Large Penis. There are thousands of threads, images and discussions on the Large Penis. You will also find thousands of non-Large Penis related threads here including politics, freedom of speech, personal family issue discussions, word games, curious sexual habits and even the occasional rubber fetishist.

The individuals posting are generally all united by their appreciation of the Large Penis. It doesn't restrict them to posting only about that topic. That's why there are several discussion forums in this board.

 

[ssnead]

I think we'd all agree that that's wrong ssnead, nothing in the universe can be wrong objectively, but placed in the context of the society within which it takes place 'bumfighting' is definitely wrong. However, if some guy wants to fuck his arsehole with massive objects he's not hurting anyone else, and no one else has the right to judge any sexual act that is consensual unless it's so far out of the norm (i.e. self mutilation) that we have to question is the person taking part mentally sound, in which case can his consent be an informed consent.

What's wrong with bumfights? It's consensual, like I said. Who's to judge?

 

[rubberwilli]

What's wrong with bumfights? It's consensual, like I said. Who's to judge?

It's exploitation, and it's unethical.

Would these guys fight each other with broomsticks and attached box cutters if they weren't offered the $50? No. It's a blatant attempt to take advantage of people who are down on their luck. The producers coerced them into the situation which involves harming another individual.

If it wasn't wrong their sequel would be Millionaire fights. But they can't exploit millionaires in that fashion, because money has no power over them. Money has power over homeless people. Using it for your own personal benefit is exploitation and it's wrong.

 

[hongkong42]

Please don't get me wrong, I wasn't judging. I had no intention of offending anyone on this site. If I did, sorry.

 

[rubberwilli]

Please don't get me wrong, I wasn't judging. I had no intention of offending anyone on this site. If I did, sorry.

No offense taken. I was just staing that not everythread on this site is about Large Penises. The majority do have a penis theme, but not all of them. It's the nature of the the site.

 

[ThickAZGuy]

How does one stumble upon 2 vids?

 

[B_Think_Kink]

How does one stumble upon 2 vids?

When you pull up one persons vid, you can see all their vids listed...

 

[ssnead]

It's exploitation, and it's unethical.

Would these guys fight each other with broomsticks and attached box cutters if they weren't offered the $50? No. It's a blatant attempt to take advantage of people who are down on their luck. The producers coerced them into the situation which involves harming another individual.

If it wasn't wrong their sequel would be Millionaire fights. But they can't exploit millionaires in that fashion, because money has no power over them. Money has power over homeless people. Using it for your own personal benefit is exploitation and it's wrong.

I cannot believe the judgmental attitude on display. By your definition, any transaction in an open marketplace is exploitation and unethical. One person is always offering another what he or she wants in order to get what they want. And to clarify - there is no coercion at all. All are free to walk away from the transaction.

But then here you come, all high and mighty, and condemn a free , uncoerced transaction among consenting adults as "unethical?" Sheesh. OK, let me see if I've got it. A guy calls sticking a traffic cone up his ass disgusting, and you've got all kinds of platitudes about the beauty of the diversity of human sexuality, and a bunch of high talk about how no one is in a position to judge, blah, blah, blah. But then on the subject of bumfights, all of a sudden you can't find any subjectivity or relativism - it's simply unethical, period. Where's the love and understanding, man? Where do you get off calling anything wrong or unethical?

I guess it's like Snoop says - you can't call black women hos or nappy-headed. But HE can, 'cause it's all different when he does it.

Must be nice to be so special. We'll try to keep in mind that you get to make the absolute calls, and we're supposed to be all relativist and accepting and shit.

 

[Stretchedsoon]

I guess his colonoscopies must be pretty straightforward - "doc, skip the lube - it's okay... haven't you got anything bigger? When I tried this at home, I used a TV camera with a lens about THIS big, not some little scope..."

Seriously, the earlier post is right, the human body is amazing, and I've been surprised at how far it'll stretch, but that's amazing...

S