I am so very sorry

B_amateurpussy666

Just Browsing
Joined
May 1, 2008
Posts
5
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
86
Location
London United Kingdom
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
I really wasn't expecting such a terrible reaction to my post. I am so very sorry I never meant to upset anyone or cause any offence. I am not a spammer or a gay guy. I am just a teenage girl having a bit of fun. Obviously, I have upset too many of you but it really wasn't intentional. I think being called ugly was the hardest thing. Anyway, I just want to say to those people who welcomed me thank you but I won't be coming back here again.



100% genuine female teenage student from Crystal Palace London SE19
 

Catchoftheday

Superior Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2007
Posts
20,165
Media
0
Likes
3,547
Points
333
Location
England (United Kingdom)
Sexuality
Unsure
I really wasn't expecting such a terrible reaction to my post. I am so very sorry I never meant to upset anyone or cause any offence. I am not a spammer or a gay guy. I am just a teenage girl having a bit of fun. Obviously, I have upset too many of you but it really wasn't intentional. I think being called ugly was the hardest thing. Anyway, I just want to say to those people who welcomed me thank you but I won't be coming back here again.



100% genuine female teenage student from Crystal Palace London SE19

Hi and bye - I hope you don't mind me asking but why did you think it was a good idea to post a picture of your mum on here?
 

D_Kay_Sarah_Sarah

Account Disabled
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Posts
5,331
Media
0
Likes
68
Points
193
And by the way. Your mum needs to give you a good kick up the ass. What the fuck are you thinking posting a pic like that of her and on the internet? and why would you even have a pic like that? Its your mum for fuck sake
 

ManlyBanisters

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Posts
12,253
Media
0
Likes
58
Points
183
boynextdoorkpt - she saaid this:
http://www.lpsg.org/86555-hi-i-m-bayley-i.html

Bayley - I'll reitterate what I said in that thread - please don't let that reaction put you off - there were several guys in that thread saying your vid was great. Listen to them and stay and be yourself.

To people who automatically assume every new poster claiming to be female is a fake why not just let time tell? Why bother posting "fake, fake, fake" at every new profile showing female? People are always complaining that there are not enough real females here and then look at the reaction when a woman comes on. It's not just this girl - this has been happening more and more lately. And I'm certain a couple of real women have been scared off.

It doesn't matter if Bayley is a real girl or not (sorry Bayley but it doesn't matter here is what I mean) - if you believe she is fake then try ignoring her. It just seems that no new member claiming female is getting anything but abuse these days.

If someone reacted to me when I first got here the way they react now I'd have fucked off too. Why stick around to be abused? Loads of hot guys come in posting stuff and everyone takes them at face value - but a hot girl comes in looking to get a little attention / havea little fun and she's automatically a fake? Come one - why should the women have to prove themselves from day one when the guys do not.

Bullshit.

Seriously, think about it - if the OP was claiming to be a hot 18 year old guy with a similar video would there have been the same reaction?

And if she does turn out to be a fake that doesn't detract one little bit from what I am saying because maybe the last one wasn't fake, or maybe the next one isn't fake.

EDIT: Why is she automatically a fake or underage?

NEWSFLASH: 18 year old girls who like sex exist!! I know - I used to be one - and had there been a place like this back in the dark fucking ages of the late 80s you can bet my sweet 18 yo ass would have been all over it!
 

ManlyBanisters

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Posts
12,253
Media
0
Likes
58
Points
183
And about the whole mum thing - there is no indication this girl has any sexual relation with her mother - they seem to have had a naughty vid shot by the same guy (from what she said in the other thread) - so they are both exploring their sexuality.. not something I would do with my mum, but each to their own. They aren't doing anything together.
 

Gillette

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Posts
6,214
Media
4
Likes
95
Points
268
Age
52
Location
Halifax (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
Bayley, two points.

First, you may only post pics of yourself in your gallery. The mom pic is gone.

Second, you may wish to remove your last name from your profile page. The net has some sick people floating on it. Do you really want to give them that much information?
 

ManlyBanisters

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Posts
12,253
Media
0
Likes
58
Points
183
Bayley, two points.

First, you may only post pics of yourself in your gallery. The mom pic is gone.

Second, you may wish to remove your last name from your profile page. The net has some sick people floating on it. Do you really want to give them that much information?

Good idea on the second point, G.

But the first? That's the first time I've heard that. I can't see anything in the ToS about it bar this

By submitting content to LPSG, you grant us an irrevocable, non-exclusive license to display the content. You represent that the content identifies no people under the age of 18, and that you are legally qualified to grant us this license.

The woman in the photo was clearly over 18 - so unless you can prove that there was no consent and she was NOT legally qualified to grant license then I do not see why it can't be there. Loads of people here have shots in their galleries of their SOs, fuck buddies, etc. - are you going to take those all down too? Hick used to have a pic of one of his dogs in his gallery - was he in violation back then? What about my uncopyrighted shots of Piggy? Do they have to go? What about merc and No_Strings - do they need to edit their galleries?
 

Northland

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Posts
5,924
Media
0
Likes
39
Points
123
Sexuality
No Response
I really wasn't expecting such a terrible reaction to my post. I am so very sorry I never meant to upset anyone or cause any offence. I am not a spammer or a gay guy. I am just a teenage girl having a bit of fun. Obviously, I have upset too many of you but it really wasn't intentional. I think being called ugly was the hardest thing. Anyway, I just want to say to those people who welcomed me thank you but I won't be coming back here again.



100% genuine female teenage student from Crystal Palace London SE19
You're young and made an error in judgement putting up info of another person. Nothing to be ashamed of or apologizing for. We learn as we live and we live as we learn. Thing to remember is "Always make new mistakes"*-that's the best way to learn.


Stick around and get adjusted here, things'll work themselves out. Welcome.




*-quote attributed to Esther Dyson
 

D_Gunther Snotpole

Account Disabled
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Posts
13,632
Media
0
Likes
73
Points
193
I think there's far too much of a rush to judgment on the whole 'fake' question.
People are often crying 'fake' with no evidence whatever.
They think they've mastered some kind of 'sniff' test.
Time to cut newbies a little slack until we know them a bit ... and then we might make up our minds.
 

ManlyBanisters

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Posts
12,253
Media
0
Likes
58
Points
183
You're young and made an error in judgement putting up info of another person. Nothing to be ashamed of or apologizing for. We learn as we live and we live as we learn. Thing to remember is "Always make new mistakes"*-that's the best way to learn.


Stick around and get adjusted here, things'll work themselves out. Welcome.

*-quote attributed to Esther Dyson

It wasn't that, Northy - it was that she posted asking if it was OK to post a link to a vid on another site. So a load of people cried 'spammer' and 'fake'. Always a possiblity, but I agree with what Rubi says in his post above, give people a bloody chance.
 

Northland

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Posts
5,924
Media
0
Likes
39
Points
123
Sexuality
No Response
It wasn't that, Northy - it was that she posted asking if it was OK to post a link to a vid on another site. So a load of people cried 'spammer' and 'fake'. Always a possiblity, but I agree with what Rubi says in his post above, give people a bloody chance.
Oh....okay. Thank you for the info. And agree, we ought to give the person a chance. (It's like a minefield around here at times.)
 

B_dumbcow

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Posts
3,132
Media
5
Likes
8
Points
123
Bayley, you can prove yourself with a picture of you holding up an LPSG sign by your face. Until then, innocent until proven guilty, so stick around :smile:
 

Gillette

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Posts
6,214
Media
4
Likes
95
Points
268
Age
52
Location
Halifax (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
The woman in the photo was clearly over 18 - so unless you can prove that there was no consent and she was NOT legally qualified to grant license then I do not see why it can't be there. Loads of people here have shots in their galleries of their SOs, fuck buddies, etc. - are you going to take those all down too? Hick used to have a pic of one of his dogs in his gallery - was he in violation back then? What about my uncopyrighted shots of Piggy? Do they have to go? What about merc and No_Strings - do they need to edit their galleries?

Allright, apparently I paraphrased the ToS poorly.

Mercurialbliss and No_Strings swapped galleries simultaneously with no complaint issued by either.

Full knowledge + no complaint = consent (as I interpret it).

I sincerely doubt this woman gave her 18 yr old daughter permission to post her picture on the net at will.

You asked before why people were calling her a fake.

amateurpussy666 - amateur...pussy...666. Not so much a personalized nickname as it is a series of tags likely to draw the lowest common denominator of misogynistic porn watchers. Add to that giving the full name repeatedly. Possibly naive, possibly making googling a more likely outcome. Add to that a revealing pic of this woman by her 'daughter' and it resolves in my mind as someone deliberately looking to embarass someone they know.

I don't personally care if a poster is real or not but I'm not keen on the above possibility.

So, pic removed.

Right, animals.

I can't think of a situation where an animal might risk losing employment or reputation for having been identified online.
 

ManlyBanisters

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Posts
12,253
Media
0
Likes
58
Points
183
Allright, apparently I paraphrased the ToS poorly.

Mercurialbliss and No_Strings swapped galleries simultaneously with no complaint issued by either.

Full knowledge + no complaint = consent (as I interpret it).

I sincerely doubt this woman gave her 18 yr old daughter permission to post her picture on the net at will.

You asked before why people were calling her a fake.

amateurpussy666 - amateur...pussy...666. Not so much a personalized nickname as it is a series of tags likely to draw the lowest common denominator of misogynistic porn watchers. Add to that giving the full name repeatedly. Possibly naive, possibly making googling a more likely outcome. Add to that a revealing pic of this woman by her 'daughter' and it resolves in my mind as someone deliberately looking to embarass someone they know.

So, pic removed.

Right, animals.

I can't think of a situation where an animal might risk losing employment or reputation for having been identified online.

I know WHY people are calling her a fake - they may even be right, my views on fakes have been stated before - it doesn't bother me. But I have seen numerous noobs with 'female' in their profiles hopped on (in a bad way) over and over recently. I just don't see why people can't be given a chance.

I wasn't referring to the mb/N_S gallery swap, I was referring to the fact that they have images of each other in their galleries at the moment. We know they have consent but, as you say, you paraphrased the ToS poorly - and I was capitalising on that for dramatic effect. Yes. Me! Whodathunkit! :rolleyes:

Animals? Again, dramatic effect - I still think Mr Ed in Mass should be sued though!! :wink: (j/k Ed)

Oh and by the way - in the other thread this poster was intimating that she and her mother used the same guy to shoot an am porn movie each. That would imply her mother is OK with it. My first thought was maybe this poster WAS the mother and there is no daughter - but I have no proof whatsoever so i'm still on innocent til proven guilty (or maybe for this site it should be genuine til proven fake).
 

ManlyBanisters

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Posts
12,253
Media
0
Likes
58
Points
183
lol

by which I mean FAKE

How does that prove anything? She said she had a porn vid on a different site.

Look - I realise I am probably arguing against the odds here, but fuck's sake - the principle is the same. The fake police come down way harder on new members claiming female than they do on new members claiming fit male. It has been rampant lately and I'll bet more than 1 or 2 real women have been scared off by the BS.