Originally posted by Hung Muscle+Sep 16 2005, 08:48 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Hung Muscle @ Sep 16 2005, 08:48 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-DC_DEEP@Sep 16 2005, 06:47 AM
The sad thing is, all STDs could be completely eliminated in our lifetime, if people would be more careful and responsible. It just simply does not happen.
[post=343737]Quoted post[/post]
Jeeez, give the guy a break. He knows he messed up and there are very few people here who haven't been in his situation.
Actually, the really sad thing here is that STDs will not be completely eliminated in our lifetime -- or any lifetime -- because people simply will not be "more careful." STDs, especially AIDS, will be eliminated only when donor governments, researchers, philanthropists and drug companies make a concerted effort to invest more funding into finding better diagnostics, preventive pharmaceutical products and cures. The piddly amount dedicated to research against these diseases pales in comparison to research dollars devoted to erectile dysfunction, hair loss and antidepressants.
Also, what's your message here, DC, when you tell him not to have even protected sex? Isn't that exactly the opposite of your advocacy to "be careful." Or, are you saying that HIV-positive people should not have sex even with condoms?
[post=343747]Quoted post[/post]
[/b][/quote]
I was sympathizing, not castigating. And giving a little advice from my perspective. I can see that making elliptical statements is no longer an option, I will just simply have to write multi-page long posts, so there is no misinterpretation of my intent.
STDs COULD be eliminated in our lifetime. Parents need to get their heads out of the sand and stop believing that "if we don't educate them, they won't do it." The medical community needs to educate parents and educators. The government needs to stop pandering to the "head-in-the-sand" conservatives, REQUIRE sexual health education (complete education) and stop throwing money at stop-gap measures and find preventions but most especially CURES. A child's education in this area should start very early, and be reinforced and supplemented as the child matures and develops. By the time the child reaches puberty, he should be well-versed in the causes, pathologies, symptoms, treatments, and above all, CONSEQUENCES of STDs. Simply telling them "it's wrong, don't do it" is not enough.
As for the comment about abstinence while waiting, perhaps I should expound upon that, too. I was not the only one who advocated "abstain until you are cleared." While he could continue sexual activity until he knows for sure, there is only one ethical course - to tell a potential partner, "it is possible that I could be infected with a STD, but I'll wear a condom, so you are OK." Not the best approach for a college-age student. It is easier, safer, and less stigma-ridden simply to abstain. To go ahead, even with a condom, but not tell the potential partner, is immoral. There is a such thing as condom failure, or worse yet, improper use (once again, the education comes to mind.)
For those who are HIV positive, protected sex is fine - as long as it is accompanied by disclosure. There is simply no excuse not to. There are plenty of activities, very low risk, that can still provide great pleasure for both persons. To engage in high-risk behaviors with an unsuspecting partner is way beyond immoral.
If someone of college age or older cannot control their sexual urges until they know what they are dealing with (generally 6 months or so) then they have much much greater problems than a possible infection.