Originally posted by madame_zora@Jan 15 2005, 08:06 PM
I got myself reall good and upset over this a few months ago. I had always believed it said "Thou shalt not kill", then someone pointed out the translation in greek actually was closert to "murder". If nothing we are reading can be taken seriously, then why read it at all, other than as a parable? I am very frustrated, religously, and have all but thrown out the baby with the bath water. If "holy men" can actually credibly use the Bible to support war, I want no part of it. Don't concern yourselves with dumping on me over this, I'll joyfully do my time in hell as well. Some things seem obvious to me, but I still could be wrong. The greatest wrong I can commit is to go against my own beliefs- this I will not do.
[post=274836]Quoted post[/post]
I understand how you feel Jana. But the beauty of the doctrine of the priesthood of the believer is that no one else can tell you how to interpret the Bible. The Quakers are Christiasn and they understand the Bible to mean they should be totaly pacifist.
Here is a test that I was taught and use. I think it will help you in understanding the Bible. If it is in the Old Testament and clearly affirmed in the New Testament then it is valid. IF it is in the Old Testament and is not clearly reaffirmed in the New TEstament, it is a "grey araa: Gray areas are where we have to come to our own conclusions as there is no clear cut command from the Bible.
Second doctrine that I especially think you Jana will appreciate and that is called the progressive revelation of God to man. The Bible is a book written by people explaining their relationship to God. The literalist don't won't to admit it, but in the early part of the Old Testament the Hebrews defintely believed in polythesism or the concept that there are many gods and not just one. The very ancient Hebrews were intent on provihg that Ya Wa or Jehovah was more powerful than the gods of their foes. Thus, the bible is a record of people discovering who God is. God is perfect throughout the Bible and his message to us is perfect. But our understanding is not. And the Bible is a record of people's relationship to God. So especially in part os the Old Testament, people's understanding of God had not reached the level tht it was later on in the Bible.
Third, I believe that everything in the Bible must be tested against what Jesus said and did. No where in the Gospels does Jesus ever endorse war. His words were if anyone slaps you on the cheek turn the other cheek. Hardly words for a General of the Army. He said to "render unto Caesar what is Caesars and to God what is Gods". In other words submit to the civil authorities. Again pacifism. Jesus was asked by his folowers on more than one ocassion to lead the army of rebillion against Rome. Jesus declined every time.
Fourth, the messge that God gave the writers was true and accurate. But our abiity to understand that is not and throurgh the years different people have added to and deleted and changed the intent through translations of the Bible. The older copies of the Bible we have are slightly different than some of the later editions. The last part of the Lord's Prayer is not in the very old trasnscripts of the Bible and thus is not recognized by the Catholic Church. "For thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory for ever. Amen." It appears that those wods were added by writers later through the centuries as a doxology.
Just because the Ten Commandments means murder instead of kill does not give anyone of us the right to assume then that all killing is OK.
You mentioned murder. If a country goes to war against another country with malicious intent, I am afraid that is murder. If a country goes to war to take the oil fields of a country let's so to increase the profits of Haliburton, then that is murder. To stand at your door shoot the man that is holding your child hostage because the other choice is the kidnapper is going to kill your child is not murder.
Every time I talk to my uncle he says Bush is a murderer. That is has murdered our precious young adults in Iraq. I'm suspect my uncle is right. The deaths in Iraq were caused by malicious intent on the part of America. And Saddam was just as guilty. So Iraq is a great wasteland of murder.
I'm sorry to say that the majority of wars count as murder on the part of one side or the other or both sides.
God is a gracious God and forgives. That is why Christians who murder still enter the kingdom of God. Sin is not really acts. Sin is a condition of which we have to be cured. Sin has many symptoms and it shows up differently in different people. We are alll guilty. All have sinned and come short of the glory of God. To take one sin and set it up as unforgivable is just against everything Jesus taught. Jesus said Father forgive them for they know not what they do. I believe Jesus was talking about all people of all ages when he said that. Those words weren't intended just for those Roman soldiers. Those words are the foundation of what Jesus was about.
So even our great generals can be Christians. You will find if you research history that the people who have argued the most against war have been the generals. They know what war is. They understand that real people are going to get killed. And they know that somone on one side or the other or both is about the business of murder.
And while we are on the subject of murder, when a government turns its eyes on the plight of some of its citizens and lets them die an needless death, that government is guilty of murder. It is malicious. If you know that a death is going to occur and you don't take steps to prevent it, you are guilty of murder.
It is interesting that thsoe against abortion because it is murder of unborn children usually are the same ones who are leading the charge for capital punishment. I don't think Jesus would approve of capital punishment period. For any reason.
To the issue of war being murder. when guys are called up for duty and are following the orders of their leaders, I don't think the soldeirs are guilty of murder. They are not being malicious. They are being patriotic and serving the duty to their country. But the country may be guilty of murder big time. So our troops in Iraq are innocent. But our leaders who used the excuse weapons of mass destruction knowing they wren't there are guilty of murder in the eyes of God. Not in the eyes of man though.
Some wars are justified or at least we tell ourselves that. A true pacifist will be run over. WE all know that. BUT Sweden has not been at war since the early 1800's. Even in World War II, Sweden managed a balancing act and avoided war. Not to defend Hitler at all. It is just that Sweden was such a facifist country that Germany chose not to invade Sweden.
On a debate team, if I could use the entire Bible I might could successfully debate and win the issue that the Bible clearly says that we should go to war. But if I am only allowed the use of the New Testament I am afraid my debate team is in trouble. There aren many passages in the New Testamet to use in defending war, There are some passaaages in the New Testament that clearly show Jesus as a pacifest.
There are justifications for war. But most wars are not justified. Self defense is a justification. It is usualy the one those wanting war use. I certainly as glad I don't have to decide whether a war is justified or not.
I do know that individual soldiers are not held responsible. They are submitting to the requirements of citizenship of a nation. Now, if they go beyond that at start pillaging and raping and murdering on their own, then that is a different siuation.
Life can be so complicated. War is the most complicated of all issues. When in war does killing become murder? That is also one of life's most difficult questions. We will never agree on this one.