It is utterly irrational to say that nerve-laden tissue was removed without reducing sensations. It's a matter of credibility. I have none because I'm selling something. Some guy who chose to be cut has none because he's rationalizing about his loss. Whatever.
No it's not. Sexual pleasure is driven by brain activity. I just found out you are selling something so you are right, you have no credibility. Your assumption that I am rationalizing my loss is an assumption, as I have stated before I gained sensations I did not even know was there. Your rational of taking something away diminishes the sense but from a biological standpoint if you lose your sight, your other sense become heightened.
You can't say you still have a fully functioning penis. If nothing changed, then why did you get cut? SOMETHING is different. Since something was taken away, and nothing added, I say sex was diminished. If you happen to like the way it was diminished, I'm thrilled for you.
When I say I still have a fully functioning penis I mean in comparison to you, or someone else with a true foreskin or the other guy who is happy with his cut penis. You are assuming again that because my foreskin was taken away my sexual sensation has to diminish. I look at my penis as an absolute, if I am happy with it and I feel it gives me all the sexual pleasure in the world who are you to tell me any different?
If the part that was removed was malfunctioning, then I'm doubly thrilled for you that it could be removed without you perceiving a loss.
This isnt a question of perception. It's a fact. I'm telling you. I'm pretty sure I'm the only one attached to my penis.
But I have to speak up when people act like choosing to amputate a body part is normal. The number for intact adults choosing to get cut is 1 in 500. (The one in 16 thousand number for Finland is the number found to ever actually need a circ for medical reasons. There's a comparable published study for Sweden).
LOL. You too with these "let me see what number I can pull out of my head to support my argument"?????? Unless you missed the boat on this one, no one is arguing that it is normal. But it does exist. People do get circumcised as adults, can we possibly take a poll of this board???? I dont care what the numbers are in regards to who is left intact versus who isnt. Fact remains is it serves a purpose in certain situations.
95% of the non-Muslim world does not circumcise. Intact is normal. The reason it matters here is that this forum is read by some guys in circumcising cultures, and I'd like to think they won't fall prey to some misguided notion that their intact genitals are abnormal.
Dude...Stop with this. Why leave Muslims out of the statistics? Maybe I should try it... I dont think anyone is arguing that intact is not normal. HOWEVER, the argument is that intact is not the only way your penis can function. If there is a problem with your intact penis you have the RIGHT to go out and seek a solution and if that solution is circumcision then you have the right to know that your sexual disposition can actually get better! Will it? I guess that is a question for each individual person.
Some guys like to wear sunglasses so they can stare at the beautiful painted desert for a long time. I like to take my glasses off and see the richness of the colors. Is either approach wrong? Of course not. Deciding for someone else that they must always wear shades would be wrong, I think we all agree.
You don't even believe in your own analogy. Your unique disposition as a marketer of a product which substitutes a foreskin wont allow for that. Your fetishistic mind dictates that the only penis you feel one should have is one with a foreskin. Despite everything you have said in this thread, you barely talked about your own penis except for the one thread where you actually had to break down what your perceived was better. I find it peculiar that you even look at sex that way. Your argument is full with flaws but the greatest one is...
You repeat that if you take something away then its gone forever. Your RIC took away your foreskin! You "restored" the skin and then you tell us about all this new sensation and new nerve activity you have down there. You are still circumcised. You still dont have your foreskin you just stretched THE SAME EXACT minimal amount of skin you had before and you expect me and the rest of this board to believe you ADDED something??? If perception is reality and in this case I do believe it is, it is of my opinion that once you had a hood of some sorts over the head of your penis, that in and of itself gives you sexual pleasure, which again...I must reiterate...Is driven from your brain, and now that you perceive yourself as having the penis of your dreams, the mental block you built up in yourself and possibly in your wife, has been removed. I am happy that you have come to this revelation, but refuse to irrationality to dicate this argument.
-DB