The penis and vagina come from the same embryonic tissue. Are you saying that the tissue types are not similar? If so, you need an education. I remember going over that in grade school. Look up Müllerian and Wolffian.
I got circumcised today
- Thread starter brianincny
- Start date
The penis and vagina come from the same embryonic tissue. Are you saying that the tissue types are not similar? If so, you need an education. I remember going over that in grade school. Look up Müllerian and Wolffian.
If you will stop assuming, like most United Staters, that your cut dick is normal, you may be able to understand what is lost. Because you were circumcised at birth, you don't know what a natural dick is like. Yours is already getting keratinized. This is what it is supposed to look like and would look like if you had not been RICed:
Attachments
Ed69
Legendary Member
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2006
- Posts
- 2,890
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 1,283
- Points
- 258
- Location
- Oregon (United States)
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
well, first off, use spaces after punctuation. It's hard to take somebody seriously who sucks at grammar.
Second, if you're worrying about other peoples' children you've got too much free time on your hands.
And third, to the previous poster, just because you've posted some pictures of a shiny dick head doesn't mean the tissue is that much different from a circ'ed dick. Please, if you would, point me to a reputable scientific study showing that glans skin on circumcised guys is somehow damaged or "dried out." I'd change my stance if people here would just come up with some reputable shit, and it never happens.
If you think that the vaginal membranes could take any long term exposure to air and not be severely damaged then you know nothing about the female anatomy. Even tampons left in a vagina can cause TSS in only a few hours whereas covering the glans with tampon material would never do the same. The glans is non-permeable. Mucous membranes are. I do believe that the foreskin is a mucous membrane because it releases ...well.. mucous. And I would love to hear what a licensed urologist would have to say about whether the glans is a mucous membrane.
I don't know what else to say about that. This whole discussing is a waste of time, IMHO. But check out my new sig, it's being updated on the fly.
Second, if you're worrying about other peoples' children you've got too much free time on your hands.
And third, to the previous poster, just because you've posted some pictures of a shiny dick head doesn't mean the tissue is that much different from a circ'ed dick. Please, if you would, point me to a reputable scientific study showing that glans skin on circumcised guys is somehow damaged or "dried out." I'd change my stance if people here would just come up with some reputable shit, and it never happens.
If you think that the vaginal membranes could take any long term exposure to air and not be severely damaged then you know nothing about the female anatomy. Even tampons left in a vagina can cause TSS in only a few hours whereas covering the glans with tampon material would never do the same. The glans is non-permeable. Mucous membranes are. I do believe that the foreskin is a mucous membrane because it releases ...well.. mucous. And I would love to hear what a licensed urologist would have to say about whether the glans is a mucous membrane.
I don't know what else to say about that. This whole discussing is a waste of time, IMHO. But check out my new sig, it's being updated on the fly.
Ed69
Legendary Member
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2006
- Posts
- 2,890
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 1,283
- Points
- 258
- Location
- Oregon (United States)
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
riiight...because not beginning a sentence with a capital is just as annoying as not putting spaces after punctuation.You know,it's funny,I chide myself for engaging in pseudo-medical and pseudo-legal discussions online.It turns out to be such a colossal waste of time for me.Any shmuck can come along and paint his silly(and often freakish)opinion as if it were fact.I guess that's the real problem with the 'net.It's just such a waste of time.Read my new sig.
ok so I did some more research and it seems that about 2 out of 3 sites that, in fact, the glans IS mucous membrane, at least when it's covered by foreskin. And this site: West Coast Mohel convinced me.
So hey, I'm not the type of guy to BS when he's wrong. I'll give you that the glans is more or less mucous membrane when uncut. Certainly not anything like the interior skin of the vagina or mouth or urethra, but yes it seems to secrete some sort mucous.
Still, who cares really?
So hey, I'm not the type of guy to BS when he's wrong. I'll give you that the glans is more or less mucous membrane when uncut. Certainly not anything like the interior skin of the vagina or mouth or urethra, but yes it seems to secrete some sort mucous.
Still, who cares really?
Not mucus dude. Mucus is produced by mast cells in the sinuses and in the joints (for lubrication). According to pathologist Ken McGrath the foreskin and vagina secrete "a proteinaceous fluid; Taylor and I believe this fluid to be a transudate extracellular fluid that leaks out from between cells that have no tight junctions." ~ reference: The Frenular Delta, A New Preputial Structure
They just dream stuff up.
yes in deed they do. their not worth the trouble posting to even straighten the stupidity of their twisting of stupid quotes and/or for what ever reason their way of thinking. anyone can plainly see and/or tell how ridiculous their stupidity is. maybe they are trying to be the last one to post in this thread and think they mite win a prize.:wink: its all BS. in the first place as they convert everything into their twisted logic no matter what anyone post. they even have their self confused at times, thats why they contra dick themselves, their just to busy dreaming up BS. to see it on their own.
i had to laugh when the op was told he wouldn't be enjoying sex in a few yrs, how dumb was that? an also after 25 yrs, he wouldn't have any sensation lol. but if he had kept his forskin he would have been more able to enjoy the ladies more in a hundred yrs, or so. LOL sargon you think maybe they should be a stand up comic ? LOL. always good to have a good laugh every now an then, and i sure got a good laugh out of that one. for a cut guy to be all washed up [ by their way of thinking ] i sure have gotten a good time from them as well as they a good time also, best time ever have have always was with a cut cock. it worked just fine to me, an he new how to work it as well. an some have been that way for lets say around 50 yrs. or less. OH thats right they have 50 more yrs, left then their be dysfunctional, oh yeah and lest we forget all dried out. LOL.. HA. HA.
Last edited:
DXJ. i would think as a friend to the person in these pics. you would tell your friend that he needs to wash his dirty dick :wink: as a uncut dick doesn't look all red an irritated like the pics. you are showing here. i have seen these type an they all stunk. an half couldn't even pull the skin back enough to clean it proper. i have seen an enjoyed enough cocks to tell a dirty one when i see it. an not all uncut cocks look like these pics. sorry D, but this is not natural cock at all. unless of coarse your so into the fetish of forskin that you prefer a dirty one. i smell that dirty cock through my screen.:biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1: i have seen clean uncut cocks but this one is dirty an you call it normal ? so i ask you D. when did dirty become a normal cock? [[[ TO ALL THE UNCUT GUYS HERE i am not meaning anything in this post about you. i am questing Ds. view of what he is calling a natural normal cock ]]]
Last edited:
Hi,
I was circumcised as an adult and I know what a "natural" dick is like. I don't feel I have lost anything. Did I just reveal a flaw in your argument?
yes you did. and rightly so. as his arguments are full of many flaws about circumcision. be it an adult or Ric.
- Joined
- May 18, 2004
- Posts
- 17,063
- Media
- 444
- Likes
- 21,763
- Points
- 468
- Location
- Charlotte, NC, USA
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- No Response
- Gender
- Male
My roomate in college got cut over Christmas break one year. He said that after it healed he was so glad he had it done and that it felt better having sex with a cut dick than when he was uncut. He had lots of problems with notbeing able to retract, which would cause infections and it was ultimately his decision to do it because he was tired of pain and irritation.
Your experience and the experiences of tens of thousands of others is data that is simply thrown away with no valid explanation. Discarded. Inconvenient. It takes the argument you are missing something fundamental and explodes it. Like matter and anti-matter they can never meet. So dxj makes sure they never do to the shock and astonishment of all.
D_Tina_Ciao
Account Disabled
I hope the OP is healed and well and enjoying an infection-free phallus.
I happen to prefer circumcised from my experience with both - first husband was circumcised, second was uncut.
But the important thing is the OP's health. Be well.
I happen to prefer circumcised from my experience with both - first husband was circumcised, second was uncut.
But the important thing is the OP's health. Be well.
Similar threads
