I got circumcised today

[B_Morning_Glory]

I'm sure he would much rather enjoy his nice new cock instead. an he isn't having the hassle with all the problems he had with his old cock.

 

[B_Morning_Glory]

No, dxj, you have misunderstood again!

By "credible guy" I meant guys that I know actually exist, rather than friends you (and others) seem to make up to support whatever "point" you are making.

my friends exist. an aren't made up for or against either side. i also have friends on both sides. an we all know where each other stands on this subject an we each respect each others ideas an preferences. as well as I'm sure others do in the real world as well. it is just a few on lpsg that have to make up things [ along with and imaginary friends ] to use as untrue examples for their propaganda brigade. but i know where your coming from with your post on this. an i agree with you 100% on it. :wink:

 

[darkbond007]

Call it what you want but scarring at the preputial sphincter is a top reason for adult circumcision. Doctors - including Daniel Sidler whose lecture I attended in September - feel it rules out stretching the preputial sphincter to relieve phimosis.

Support for this? You guys are just making stuff up now. Now youre telling me a guy even if he plays with his foreskin at 8 could be damaging it and causing phimosis not even knowing he is doing it. I'm gonna call BS. The same thing a doctor MAY do the kid can end up doing himself. Who do you blame then? Look, Phimosis is a natural occurence that occurs to a small population of males. I doubt 15% of males experience it. However those of us who do just want to be rid of it, there are numerous ways to get rid of it. Phimosis does not have one area where it affects, so your story of preputial sphincter has no grounds.

Uhm, did you notice it was cut-in-adulthood guys saying that sensitivity decreases? Guy1 says: I was very sensitive right after my circumcision. Guy2 says: That went away gradually over time. I don't recall the exact words they used or I'd search for it, but it was in this thread I'm quite sure.

I don't understand why you think it's a dumb concept. Any mucosa exposed to the elements will dry and toughen.

You mean guy 2 who has like 2 posts and all two posts happen to be in this thread who I am sure is one of you anti circumcision neophytes?

Here let me give you guy 3: "I was very sensitive right after my circumcision in 2004 and you know what I am still very sensitive after my circumcision now that its 2009"

 

[B_Morning_Glory]

lie and make stuff up. thats all they have ever done DARKBOND. just go back threw most of the post an replies on this subject an any one who knows anything about circumcision and a forskin can see just how stupid their lies are. also i give you guy #4 my hubby. he hasn't lost any sensitivity since circumcision, nor has any of the guys i know thats been circ. longer than him as well. they are getting it on better now than before with no problems. hubby was cut in 1997 still sensitive in 2009. so they are getting that lie found out as well as this is the last straw they have left to grab for in their argument about a circumcised cock. and that argument has been proved wrong by many who know the truth. as well as many medical people who have done research on it, an found their argument to be false concerning sensitivity and circumcision.

 

[TLCTugger]

you're telling me a guy even if he plays with his foreskin at 8 could be damaging it and causing phimosis

NEVER said anything of the kind.

The owner of a foreskin can and should do whatever feels good - to his own foreskin. His own curious and pleasurable manipulations lead to good foreskin health.

Fiddling by others including doctors is the dangerous stuff for a child and the man he will become.

 

[karldergrosse]

Just what the OP's intent with this thread was, just what he expected to receive comments on, is unclear. But one thing is, I think, certain: This thread has limped on far too long and should be brought to a close. But until then:

All these circfetishists dwell in egotistic fantasyland, where anything they choose to blurt out must be true, no matter how incorrect or irrational, just because they assert it--even if they have absolutely no substantiation for it or even basic knowledge of the subject. A little objective, open-minded research would, of course, undermine their egregious nonsense--thus they can only spew twisted emotionalism and hostility toward anyone who might dare contradict them (horrors!). Most likely they feel that they have to justify what has been done to them. Should they accept the truth, they would feel that they have been damaged and betrayed--which they bloody well have been. They accuse Intactivists of having an agenda with ulterior motives...but nothing could be further from the truth. Circfetishists are the ones who want to continue the barbarous rape of infant foreskins, taking from those little persons their right to choose. It is Intactivists who want to assure every male his inalienable right to make decisions about his own body. If that means an adult freely chooses circumcision, so be it--Intactivists have no quarrel whatsoever with an adult's actions. It's that man's absolute right to do as he will with his own penis...but not with an infant's. It is precisely that right of individual choice that the fanatic circfetishists wish to deny every male. Now just who is it with an agenda...?

And by the way--I've offered to pay all medical expenses involved if that loud-mouthed, spelling-, grammar-, and logic-challenged female who's so hot for male circumutilation will undergo surgical removal of her clit hood (i.e., female circumcision). That way she might have at least half a leg to stand on when she spouts off about male genitalia. But guess what--she still has not taken me up on that offer...surprise, surprise! However, it still stands...so anytime she's ready........................

 

[darkbond007]

NEVER said anything of the kind.

The owner of a foreskin can and should do whatever feels good - to his own foreskin. His own curious and pleasurable manipulations lead to good foreskin health.

Fiddling by others including doctors is the dangerous stuff for a child and the man he will become.

Same implication dude. Just as a doctor can force the skin back a kid can do the same. Youre not saying it but it can be implied and applied. If we use your argument then that same "curiosity and pleasurable manipulation" can lead to phimosis!

 

[darkbond007]

They accuse Intactivists of having an agenda with ulterior motives...but nothing could be further from the truth. Circfetishists are the ones who want to continue the barbarous rape of infant foreskins, taking from those little persons their right to choose. It is Intactivists who want to assure every male his inalienable right to make decisions about his own body. If that means an adult freely chooses circumcision, so be it--Intactivists have no quarrel whatsoever with an adult's actions. It's that man's absolute right to do as he will with his own penis...but not with an infant's. It is precisely that right of individual choice that the fanatic circfetishists wish to deny every male. Now just who is it with an agenda...?

This thread alone proves once and for all that "inactivists" (lol that was funny) don't care about an adult making their own decision. When some of us do they question why and if we even made a smart decision. I think everyone who is happily circumcised in this thread as an adult is very thankful that we were given the opportunity to choose and none of us have even discussed RIC.

The agenda comes in when you have the restorers and foreskin mongerers walking into a thread about adult circumcision and riling up a bunch of ficticious stories and blatant propoganda.

Its just downright sickening.

 

[herkimer snow]

Any woman who promotes circumcision as an "authority," although she possesses neither penis nor foreskin, is simply expressing her need to dominate males. Receiving joy from a male having half the skin cut off his penis is her method of domination. An adult male can do whatever he wishes with his penis. He can have it circumcised, tatooed, pierced, or fileted--whatever. It's his. But he does take a risk in circumcision of losing sensation. You can't remove that much sensitive skin and remain the same, no matter what the claim is. The OP, if he had had a functioning foreskin that had caused him no problems, would still have it today and be using it and enjoying it. With his phimosis, circumcision was a wise choice, and his new penis is working fine. Good for him. But to claim that circumcision is always a superior choice, is laughable to the hundreds of millions of us who have foreskins and enjoy them. If you don't own a penis, it's best to just shut up about this business. That's probably asking too much, and I'm sure the female rant will go on and on as it has ad nauseum. Oh, well, we always need a laugh.

 

[darkbond007]

But he does take a risk in circumcision of losing sensation. You can't remove that much sensitive skin and remain the same, no matter what the claim is.

Why not? The thing is sexual sensation is driven from the brain, those of us who were circumcised as adults and have experienced sex on both sides have touted numerous times in this thread that there is no loss in sensation.

But to claim that circumcision is always a superior choice, is laughable to the hundreds of millions of us who have foreskins and enjoy them.

I dont think anyone is calling it "superior". But at the same time you have hundreds of millions of men who are cut and enjoy it that way.

 

[joeweekend]

Wow, I was gonna say "Why'd you go do that?"

Then I read up on phimosis.

Congrats. I've been enjoying my cut cock now for decades! Welcome to the club.

 

[B_Morning_Glory]

Just what the OP's intent with this thread was, just what he expected to receive comments on, is unclear. But one thing is, I think, certain: This thread has limped on far too long and should be brought to a close. But until then:

All these circfetishists dwell in egotistic fantasyland, where anything they choose to blurt out must be true, no matter how incorrect or irrational, just because they assert it--even if they have absolutely no substantiation for it or even basic knowledge of the subject. A little objective, open-minded research would, of course, undermine their egregious nonsense--thus they can only spew twisted emotionalism and hostility toward anyone who might dare contradict them (horrors!). Most likely they feel that they have to justify what has been done to them. Should they accept the truth, they would feel that they have been damaged and betrayed--which they bloody well have been. They accuse Intactivists of having an agenda with ulterior motives...but nothing could be further from the truth. Circfetishists are the ones who want to continue the barbarous rape of infant foreskins, taking from those little persons their right to choose. It is Intactivists who want to assure every male his inalienable right to make decisions about his own body. If that means an adult freely chooses circumcision, so be it--Intactivists have no quarrel whatsoever with an adult's actions. It's that man's absolute right to do as he will with his own penis...but not with an infant's. It is precisely that right of individual choice that the fanatic circfetishists wish to deny every male. Now just who is it with an agenda...?

And by the way--I've offered to pay all medical expenses involved if that loud-mouthed, spelling-, grammar-, and logic-challenged female who's so hot for male circumutilation will undergo surgical removal of her clit hood (i.e., female circumcision). That way she might have at least half a leg to stand on when she spouts off about male genitalia. But guess what--she still has not taken me up on that offer...surprise, surprise! However, it still stands...so anytime she's ready........................

if anyone is in fantesy land i would have to say its you and others like you who just want to post BS about the op and circ. you an the brigade just cant stand it hen your proven wrong once again about being or getting circumsied. poor thing. you poor poor pathetic little thing. nothing to do but get on lpsg an twist an make up lies about those who prefer a clean smooth cut cock over [ MOST LIKLY YOUR DIRTY SMELLY ONE ]:wink: an twis words around thats been posted by others who dont share your same ideas. their are even uncut guys who probly by now think your a little off as well, but out of respect they look the other way. but you have to ask them that, as im not speacking for them here. an yes this is gramar thought id give you something else to post about sweetie enjoy.

 

[B_Morning_Glory]

Any woman who promotes circumcision as an "authority," although she possesses neither penis nor foreskin, is simply expressing her need to dominate males. Receiving joy from a male having half the skin cut off his penis is her method of domination. An adult male can do whatever he wishes with his penis. He can have it circumcised, tatooed, pierced, or fileted--whatever. It's his. But he does take a risk in circumcision of losing sensation. You can't remove that much sensitive skin and remain the same, no matter what the claim is. The OP, if he had had a functioning foreskin that had caused him no problems, would still have it today and be using it and enjoying it. With his phimosis, circumcision was a wise choice, and his new penis is working fine. Good for him. But to claim that circumcision is always a superior choice, is laughable to the hundreds of millions of us who have foreskins and enjoy them. If you don't own a penis, it's best to just shut up about this business. That's probably asking too much, and I'm sure the female rant will go on and on as it has ad nauseum. Oh, well, we always need a laugh.

THE same can be said for you sir ass. if you still have a forskin then according to what you just posted above. YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT BEING CIRCUMCISED AN OR SENSITIVITY. your just wanting to dominate an feel superior over all men who have or are circ. just because you have a forskin. [ WRONG] it doesn't work that way dude. oh an i did get a small chuckle from your post maybe you will do better the next time around.

 

[vibrator]

Wow, I don't think I could go through with that. Thats a tough one.

 

[justcurious80]

OK, can i petition to have this thread closed???? There will never be a resolution. There are always two sides to this debate, an it upsets me that people argue over it so much.. Both sides have been well educated on the problems with routine infant circumcision as well as some benefits for those medical cases that need it. There are people in the world who want to be circumcised, unfortunately its the reality that we have to face. There are thousands of parents misinformed about circumcision. There are thousands of devout religious people who find it to be "important" for their faith. There are thousands of people (myself included) that believe RIC is awful, and that it is the indiviuals choice to circumcise (if he has been given the truth about it). personally, i feel most people don't like uncut dicks because , as americans, its different and not normal and ugly (i know, weird...). I also believe that for those who are upset about their circumcision, they deserve the absolute right to try foreskin restoration (myself included). Its a valid way to help resensitize the penis and/or give you closure on the issue.



im not arguing. I just hate that every day i log on here, i see the same people bicker back and forth and say the same things to each other over and over. There is no point people. I truly believe that if a poster has read all of these pages, they are well educated on both sides of this issue and therefore can render their own decision and thats that.


anyone else agree with me?

oh ill add one more thing: every case is different. There isn't a concrete standard for sensitivity or how people feel as circumcised or uncircumcised individuals. nervous systems are different for people. emotions are different. i don't think its a good thing to generalize the statements said about the issue

 

[STYLYUNG]

The surgeon who did my circ said that he had done many of thenmto save marriges, where the husband was a pre-mature ejaculator. The circ lessened the sensivity of the glans, allowing the husband to "work" longer with better control over his orgasm. The circ of the husband ended the frustration of the unsatisfied wives. In my case I did not notice any difference in sensitivity because I had worn my foreskin in a retracted position for several years. The hygene factor alone is reason enough to be circumcised. If you aren't cut, don't criticize men who are---no odor, no smegma. Just clean.

 

[D_Jerry_Atric]

In my case I did not notice any difference in sensitivity because I had worn my foreskin in a retracted position for several years. The hygene factor alone is reason enough to be circumcised. If you aren't cut, don't criticize men who are---no odor, no smegma. Just clean.

An intact penis with a foreskin is not "dirty", just like a cut cock is not "clean".

Smegama has actually been proven to keep the penis clean since it's antibacterial, and it can even prevent STDs.

I've been with guys who are cut and had really bad hygiene and smelled worse than when I don't wash my entire body for a few days.

It's called washing with soap and water and even cut men can smell and taste nasty if they do not wash with soap and water or have bad hygiene practices.

It would be like if you don't brush your teeth or floss at all and then you wonder why you would get tooth decay, have nasty breath, and why your teeth rot and fall out.

Just wondering why did you get cut as an adult?

Also why did you keep it back all the time? I remember trying to do this when I was young so I'd look cut but it does not work for me since my foreskin is long, and it made me constantly hard.

 

[darkbond007]

The surgeon who did my circ said that he had done many of thenmto save marriges, where the husband was a pre-mature ejaculator. The circ lessened the sensivity of the glans, allowing the husband to "work" longer with better control over his orgasm. The circ of the husband ended the frustration of the unsatisfied wives. In my case I did not notice any difference in sensitivity because I had worn my foreskin in a retracted position for several years. The hygene factor alone is reason enough to be circumcised. If you aren't cut, don't criticize men who are---no odor, no smegma. Just clean.

Sorry, I cant agree with that. When I was uncut I would just clean my penis like any other self respecting guy. It really isnt that big of a deal.

To me a dirty dick is a dirty dick no matter what, whether you are cut or uncut. You dont shower for a week I think they end up the same place. The only thing for me regarding smegma is if I thought I was getting head from a girl after a night of partying or so I would go into a bathroom stall and just make sure everything was copacetic down there. I think that was just more common courtesy than being hygienic.

I also think that doctor is talking out of his ass. This is a clear situation of perception is reality, if you get circumcised you last longer? If that was the case people would be kicking down doors for circumcisions.

 

[wallaboi]

Just what the OP's intent with this thread was, just what he expected to receive comments on, is unclear.

what is clear:
as an adult the OP has the right to choose any body modification he chooses...circumscision, piercing, tatoos etc. without judgment from others

OP says the reason for his decision to get circumcised is because the medical condition of phimosis. This does not seem to be supported by photos of his intact penis before his operation, which appears quite normal and healthy (however, I am not a physician and may be wrong). If you want to get cut to fit in with your mates and prefer the look...just do it! You don't need to justify yourself to anybody.

OP has made several posts infering that an uncircumscised penis is less hygenic than a cut one. If that is your opinion, then you have solved the problem of your dirty penis by getting cut...good onya and enjoy it and... shut the fuck up.

the OP objects to posters going off topic by expressing opinions against routine infant circumscision, saying they are hijacking the thread of his "personal journey", yet neglects to comment on extereme nutters like saragon and that dum chick who rant and rave all kinds of crap which is totally off the thread and have no relevance to the topic of adult circumscision. Some objectivity and balance ...if you please,

 

[B_Morning_Glory]

RIC has no right in this thread. this thread was started by the op about his circumcision and his experiences as such. he did not ask for opinions on RIC, an or ask to be told how stupid he was to get cut, wallaboi you an others seem to think you hold the cards concerning circumcised cocks an their owners as well as women an men who like them. WRONG you are not Superior over anyone just because you have a skin draped across you cock. your happy with it fine. your not. do something about it. some like it some dont. i dont. Ive had my share of the uncut cock thank you. their are others who prefer them an to them i say,,, you can
happily have my share.. when given a choice, ill take cut cocks over uncut every time. also it is the op thread not yours. so if you don't like what he says or what his thread was or is about stay out of the thread an don't post in it then you wont be offended by anything contrary to your way of thinking. besides look on the brite side here.. it never hurts to liven things up now an then. i like a good fight now an then my self. so bring your smelly unclean cock over here an lets get the fight started huh? what ya say? as this thread is starting to die some what..... but lets ask the op first as it is his thread ?