Just what the OP's intent with this thread was, just what he expected to receive comments on, is unclear. But one thing is, I think, certain: This thread has limped on far too long and should be brought to a close. But until then:
All these circfetishists dwell in egotistic fantasyland, where anything they choose to blurt out must be true, no matter how incorrect or irrational, just because they assert it--even if they have absolutely no substantiation for it or even basic knowledge of the subject. A little objective, open-minded research would, of course, undermine their egregious nonsense--thus they can only spew twisted emotionalism and hostility toward anyone who might dare contradict them (horrors!). Most likely they feel that they have to justify what has been done to them. Should they accept the truth, they would feel that they have been damaged and betrayed--which they bloody well have been. They accuse Intactivists of having an agenda with ulterior motives...but nothing could be further from the truth. Circfetishists are the ones who want to continue the barbarous rape of infant foreskins, taking from those little persons their right to choose. It is Intactivists who want to assure every male his inalienable right to make decisions about his own body. If that means an adult freely chooses circumcision, so be it--Intactivists have no quarrel whatsoever with an adult's actions. It's that man's absolute right to do as he will with his own penis...but not with an infant's. It is precisely that right of individual choice that the fanatic circfetishists wish to deny every male. Now just who is it with an agenda...?
And by the way--I've offered to pay all medical expenses involved if that loud-mouthed, spelling-, grammar-, and logic-challenged female who's so hot for male circumutilation will undergo surgical removal of her clit hood (i.e., female circumcision). That way she might have at least half a leg to stand on when she spouts off about male genitalia. But guess what--she still has not taken me up on that offer...surprise, surprise! However, it still stands...so anytime she's ready........................
LOL! She should know that women produce smegma too, as well as yeast, some women do not know how to clean their genitals with soap and water and this is basic hygiene, and that a yeast infection and smegma from a woman and some women's vaginas smell worse than that of an intact penis with a foreskin.
If shes uses the argument that a cut cock is somehow "cleaner" than an intact penis with a foreskin, why isn't she getting surgery done to her genitals so they are "cleaner" and do not produce smegma or even yeast (intact men do not produce yeast)? She had her husband do this.
g32js - I'm a lover not a fighter, and I definately don't fight below my weight. Particularly when the opponent is also lame. So I forfeit, coz you found my achilles heel. I just can't take nagging of any kind. No wonder your husband got circumscised coz you are a world champion nagger.
LMAO! LOL A male friend of mine jokes that most women have the nag gene.
I find it odd that a biological woman who doesn't even have a penis, seems to assume that she knows so much about what it's like to have a penis at all, let alone a penis that is fully intact with a foreskin.
g32-If you're happy with your husband's cut penis and he's actually happy with it too that's fine but don't assume that every guy that is not cut isn't happy with his intact penis and does not want to get cut at all or see the need for it at all, and also it's rather foolish of you to say that a cut penis is somehow more "clean" than an intact penis with a foreskin that gets washed with soap and water like you would do to any other part of your body, or so I'd hope. My friend's roommate is in his mid 20s and apparently doesn't use toilet paper or wash his ass.
uke:
I don't think that circumcision should be done on infant boys at all as they have no say in it. The same goes for boys/men who get it done in Africa and the middle east and the Philipines because of pointless religious and cultural traditions or because it "makes them a man" in their culture.
Likewise female circumcisions that get done on women/girls are wrong too, and if a guy does want it done as an adult it's his body and his decision but I still don't see the point of it unless there's a rare medical condition that can't be fixed with manual stretching or some minor surgery that isn't circumcision.
Likewise if an adult woman wants to surgically alter or remove any part of her vagina she should be allowed to do this but I don't see the point of it.
It would be like getting an eye infection or pink eye or something else and then saying how the eye is dirty and even though the eye is self cleaning how they eyelid should be removed so eye infections do not happen.
The foreskin is on a male penis for a reason, and that's to provide pure penile pleasure to the man who owns it!
Most of my male friends (they are all orientations) who are cut really wish that they were not and had an intact penis with a foreskin.
