- Joined
- Jun 13, 2008
- Posts
- 442
- Media
- 33
- Likes
- 250
- Points
- 363
- Location
- Rainforest dweller
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 90% Gay, 10% Straight
- Gender
- Male
I got circumcised today
- Thread starter brianincny
- Start date
Sure, a cut cock,... or a dowel, your choice. Or any of a zillion sex toys.
It's the plush slinky frictionless feeling of a natural penis that's unmatched by contraptions.
ur hilarious dude, luv ur comments, u bring up an interesting point, maybe chicks who's first sexual experience is with a dildo, actually condition themsleves to get off on the "dowel" effect and can't appreciate sex with an intact natural cock.
thx for standing up for us uc dudes. the rest of the world is uc, the US is just late to the party.
LOL. Ive had both and I dont think in the end women really care, cock is cock, at the end of the day we all can be either tender loving flesh or a stiff dildo no matter our penile status... youre restored not uncut, dont pretend you are...
Always trying to pass it off like one is more superior than another. A penis is a penis.
Last edited:
, maybe chicks who's first sexual experience actually condition themselves and can't appreciate sex with an intact cock. LOL. my sexual experiences was with uncut cock and first one i mite add here was uncut .[ god what a useless cock that one was] after a few other experiences with CIRCUMCISED cocks i new a cut cock could pleasure much better than uncut could ever do. so my sexual experiences with cut cocks have always been fantastic, unlike the BS. your putting out about them.
thx for standing up for us uc dudes. the rest of the world is uc, the US is
just late to the party.
yeah birds of a feather flock together. an if its a party were all going to ill take all the cut guys. you two can have the boring uncut they don't please me at all.
yes it is as just for looking at one. but i do prefer a circumcied one over a uncut one. i have had enough of both. cut an uncut. and when given a choice i will chose cut over uncut every time. not saying anything toward all uncut guys here. except of coarse the anti= circ nuts we have here. i love to see them get piss off lol. :wink:
learn how to use the goddamn quote feature, and don't make your fukd up syntax look like i said it.
your husband must be so overjoyed that you spend 485 hrs a week posting circ propaganda bullshit on here, spending time worrying about everybody else's cock, instead of sukin on his [according to you] "perfectly cut, hyper hygenically clean, super aesthetically beautiful, recently circumcised, odorless, best possible dick man ever modified".
if you're so fukin satisfied with his high and tight cut cock why aren't u riding it RIGHT NOW??????
nevermind, come to think of it, if i was your husband i'd be grateful you were doing anyting BUT me.
Last edited:
well hubby is not cut high and tight he got to pick what kind of circ he wanted. he is a truck driver which is why I'm on here so much. he thinks it is funny when i tell him what goes on here. don't matter to him what i do never has. he likes what he has. when he is home i do ride him.
Exactly. Over and over women say they aren't in love with the cock but the person attached to it. You don't see women in ads seeking 8" uncut cock only gay/bisexual men. Women's mating strategies are so much more complex than men it's astounding.
The Evolution Of Desire: Strategies Of Human Mating
that is right sargon, we don't. the guy is much more important than his dick. I just like to piss the anti-circs off as you can tell and it must be working they havent learned not to show they are mad yet.
Looks like more of a lovefest with sargon and G32 and you as the principals. What you said just does not make sense. All body parts function better when they are intact. The tissue on a natural penis glides. Some cut guys still retain a bit of this function, but the difference is between sliding in and poking in. Between natural function and artificial lubricants.
I'm glad brianincny has a circumcision he can live with. But caveat emptor. Not everyone is as thrilled. I totally recommend a local anesthesia so you can see what (and how much) is being cut off. Look what happened here:
_____________________________________
Man claims penis amputated without consent
Ky. patient sues doctor, who thought he detected cancer in the organ
The Associated Press
updated 1:46 p.m. MT, Thurs., Sept . 25, 2008
LOUISVILLE, Ky. - A Kentucky man who claims his penis was removed without his consent during what was supposed to be a circumcision has sued the doctor who performed the surgery.
Phillip Seaton, 61, and his wife are seeking unspecified compensation from Dr. John M. Patterson and the medical practice that performed the circumcision for loss of service, love and affection. The Seatons also are seeking unspecified punitive damages from Patterson and the medical practice, Commonwealth Urology.
A woman who answered the phone at Commonwealth Urology would not take a message for the doctor Thursday. But the Seatons attorney said the doctors post-surgical notes show the doctor thought he detected cancer and removed the penis. Attorney Kevin George said a later test did detect cancer.
It was not an emergency, George told The Associated Press on Thursday. It didnt have to happen that way.
Seaton was having the procedure on Oct. 19, 2007, to better treat inflammation.
The lawsuit filed earlier this month in state court claims Patterson removed Seatons penis without consulting either Phillip or Deborah Seaton, or giving them an opportunity to seek a second opinion.
The couple also sued the anesthesiologist, Dr. Oliver James of Shelbyville, claiming he used a general anesthesia even though Seaton asked that it not be administered.
A message left at Commonwealth Urologys corporate office in Lexington was not immediately returned Thursday. A message left for James also was not immediately returned.
The Seatons suit is similar to one in which an Indianapolis man was awarded more than $2.3 million in damages after he claimed his penis and left testicle were removed without his consent during surgery for an infection in 1997.
© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
URL: Man claims penis amputated without consent - Health care- msnbc.com
MSN Privacy . Legal
© 2009 MSNBC.com
No matter. Experts call it Groupthink:
Groupthink is a type of thought exhibited by group members who try to minimize conflict and reach consensus without critically testing, analyzing, and evaluating ideas.
Eventually it all collapses on itself.
Eventually it all collapses on itself.
that's the only reason you're here, every one of your 1400 posts is like a broken record,
each one designed to desperately seek attention for yourself, even if that attention is anger or the wrath of someone totally disgusted by your ignorance of any other point of view. your sole intent is to provoke to get a response, ANY response because you're that unfulfilled.
u know sargon i've been reading your posts on here for a while and i can't figure out what the hell position you're arguing for.
are you arguing :
A) for 100% routine infant circumcision?
B) that all women hate uncut cock?
C) that your penis is superior in every way since it's cut?
D) without being circumcised, boys cocks will be: ugly, infected, dirty, stink, offensive, spread hiv, be continuously plagued with endless STDs, all get phimosis and require surgery and circumcision anyway?
E) all of the above?
F) that u don't really know what you stand for, u just need validation for your penis in the most egocentric way possible?
you post internet study after study that backs all your claims and call those indisputable facts, but when anybody posts a study that refutes any of your claims you dismiss it as myth and lies. you're like fox news. you think as long as you say something often enuff that makes it true.
you seem desperate to prove and justify your cut status as superior, but if anybody suggests that their uncut dick provides any benefit, you dismiss it as nonsense and lies, and you completely and continually ignore that 80% of the men in this world have absolutely no problems with their uncut cocks. and based on the world fertility rates, there must be a fair amount of women who actually dig uncut too.
Minor correction.
80% of the world have uncut dicks. We are not aware of what percentage of them do or do not have a problem(s) with it.
1) if being uncut is such a huge problem circ rates wouldn't be dropping in places like australia and the US where there is complete access to modern medical care and procedures.
2) if having a foreskin was an untenable problem you'd see uncut percentages at 20% instead of 80%, case closed. game over.
if ur cut and like it good for u, if ur uncut and don't like it, get it cut, but don't tell me my uncut dick is dirty or undesireable, just to rationalize your cut status.
As a mother of a circumsized son, I read the circumsion threads on LPSG to assuage my guilt for having the procedure performed when my son was two days old. I agnonized, researched medical journals, poured over threads such as these and, debated with my ex-husband for nine long months.
There was then, as is proven by these never-ending circumsion threads and posts, no clear cut answer (excuse the pun.) I heard from men in the UK that were angry with their parents for not having them cut as infants and just as many in the US angry for having the procedure performed. I met women who married men from other countries who told me that their husbands couldn't wait to be circumsized as adults.
I was surprised at the number of women who were shocked that I was even considering leaving my son uncircumsized. I found it sad actually that these mothers were not even questioning such a serious, painful and, permament decision. Perhaps I've always been more penis-conscious? LOL
At the end of nine months I had decided that I did not want my son circumsized but, I realized that his father had just as much say as I did. I knew that his father loved him as much as I did and would not intentionally hurt him.
Because, his father has a penis and I don't, I deferred to him and we had the procedure performed. I was upset about it for days before and after.
When my son was born I though that his penis was PERFECT and was sick at the thought of someone changing it without his consent. Nothing like dealing with the post-operative c-section pain, post-partum baby blues and then seeing my son's angry looking cut penis and his crying after urination for days.
That being said I "got over it." Do I regret it? No, because the decision was not mine alone to make. We couldn't get him 50% circumsized and I still believe that his father had the right to the 51% of the decision. Do I wish that his father and I had agreed and left the circumsion decision up to my son to make for himself? YES.
Just one mother's feelings on the subject.
BTW, I have no preference. I like them both ways. :smile:
No your statement was based on an assumption and your statement does not even allude to falling circ rates. Stay focused. You made it seem like an uncut cock is an absolute and anyone who has one does not have a problem with it. Being a person who once had an uncut cock for 24 years and realizing that there was a problem I felt the need to correct you. I stand by my correction regardless of what you want to argue about now because your points above are not a part of what I originally corrected you on.
Similar threads
