ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
That sounded soooooooo childish, LOL!
You missed the point, idiot. In other words, there are mothers who've lost their sons that are against the war as well.
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
That sounded soooooooo childish, LOL!
Why didn't you mention your cockring, stratedude?
You missed the point, idiot. In other words, there are mothers who've lost their sons that are against the war as well.
exactly...it was cheap (if not in bad taste) to have brought the bracelet up in the first place.
McCain brought up HIS bracelet first, Saying some mother of a dead soldier begged him to make sure her son did not die in vain...
Obama said he had a bracelet given him by a mother who begged him to not let any one Else's son die for this stupid war.
If the two perspectives- One mother wants to McCain to Kill OTHER people's sons to validate her loss.
The Other mother doesn't want any mother to have to suffer the loss of their son.
The former is an entirely selfish perspective.
The latter is unselfish and compassionate.
Selfish and self centered- the republican family value of validating death thru more death.
Compassionate and thinking of others- the democratic value of valuing American lives over pointless military glory.
It nauseates me when candidates go into those "I met an [American-fill-in-the-blank] who told me..." stories, and that includes Barack. But the Republicans weigh in heavily on these, brought up by Ronald Regan, who schooled them. I find it all so vapid and revolting. Anyone who buys this crap as sincere, or telling, about who the candidate is, is buying the Reader's Digest version of political reality. Just shoot me now. Better yet, shoot them.
exactly...it was cheap (if not in bad taste) to have brought the bracelet up in the first place.
It is this tiny-world thinking that is the falacy of liberal thinking.McCain brought up HIS bracelet first, Saying some mother of a dead soldier begged him to make sure her son did not die in vain...
Obama said he had a bracelet given him by a mother who begged him to not let any one Else's son die for this stupid war.
If the two perspectives- One mother wants to McCain to Kill OTHER people's sons to validate her loss.
The Other mother doesn't want any mother to have to suffer the loss of their son.
The former is an entirely selfish perspective.
The latter is unselfish and compassionate.
.
It is this tiny-world thinking that is the falacy of liberal thinking.
In reality the former knows the importance to her country of winning the war, and that defeat will have made it pointless to have gone in the first place (which explains why so many libs seem to WANT the US to lose there). She obviously knows what it means to fight and die for a cause, and the importance for a country to have those that are willing to make the ultimate sacrifice. Without people like this, there cannot be people like you. Always remember that.
And in my opinion, the latter is selfish because she feels that there is no greater cause than herself and her own feelings. That is sad.
You are an idiot. I served in the military, and while there are some lost souls there, a very large majority of them are proud to defend their country, and are willing to risk it all to perform this duty. The LAST thing these brave pariotic servicemen want is for their mothers to compromise the security of their country to put their fears of personal loss at ease. It's idiots like you that have had it too easy for too long. How many people in Georgia do you think has this selfish, nieve way of thinking?No, what's sad is that you'd have the audacity to put yourself in the shoes of a family who has lost a loved one, and that you'd further have the unmitigated GALL...the presumption to judge them - to characterize them as selfish. Why?
Because their feelings and point of view don't correspond with your own and don't support your own political agenda.
There's no end to the fuckin' NERVE of you guys, is there?