I have a grand idea to get more new members on LPSG!!!

[galaxus]

Yeah dick worshipping gay men are SUCH a problem

http://www.lpsg.org/71830-huge-natural-tits-on-a.html
Over 11,000 replies and 2.2million views
http://www.lpsg.org/48232-amateur-girls-and-big-cocks.html
Most viewed thread with 3.4million views

Most popular gay adult websites has 2 different threads that could qualify as most popular, one has 763 replies but the most viewed thread has 280k views.

Judging by the comparison there, maybe straight men should find a titty worshipping site. :biggrin:
.

Alright take the "gay" out. Just dick worshiping men then. It not about them being gay.

 

[maxcok]

I've only received a few PM's from very friendly gay dudes. I didn't come to this site to share my glorious dick. I came to this site to compare my dick size. I learned quickly that dick size really isn't that important unless its REALLY big or REALLY small.

I STAYED on this site because of the few interesting people here, especially the women in the women's section. I also stay because of the funny and interesting threads in the Etcetera section.

I want to bring in more members because I think this site has help me. Not for the porn it provides. Not to get women to look at my dick. Not to talk about big dicks with other people....

I feel this site has sexually liberated me. I can talk about sex, taboos, and all kinds of naughty things here. I can even discuss morality, spirituality, and politics with some of the more intelligent members.

I want new members to bring in new minds. To get more people talking about things they might be afraid to talk about. Things like sex, homophobia, and ect. They don't necessarily have to be women, but that would be great too.

With help of the internet, the anonymity on this site might bring out our ugly sides and ideas, but it also helps us reveal things that are hidden within us.

Alright take the "gay" out. Just dick worshiping men then. It not about them being gay.

Well, you've changed your tune quite a bit since your OP's, where you specifically said you wanted to bring more women to the site instead of "dickworshipping gay men". Whether they're male, female, gay or otherwise, there's bound to be some serious attention to dick going on. Another news flash. IT'S A BIG DICK SITE!!! WHAT DO YOU EXPECT??!!!

In terms of overall numbers and the variety of voices and viewpoints the site seems to be doing quite well, imo. I don't think we need a recruitment program, which could well attract a lower common denominator. Better if people are drawn here of their own accord

 

[galaxus]

News flash: Generally speaking, women aren't obsessed with dicks, or even sexual imagery, the way men are - gay, straight or in between. I know it's hard for lots of you guys to wrap your heads around that, but it's true. There are exceptions of course, and you see them here, but they are the minority. On the other side, I see many complaints from women who are annoyed and repulsed by the flood of unsolicited dick picks they receive.

The "diversity" of the users, or lack thereof, is defined by the theme of the site. Women, like men, are going to find their way here and hang around if they're interested. Recruiting more members is not going to add to the diversity of the site unless you figure out how to keep the men out. Regardless, you can't get women to obsess on your dick if they're not interested.

So would it hurt to seek out more of those exceptions?

Adding diversity doesn't mean just getting more women on here. It means getting men and women from many different cultures and backgrounds to talk about.... the stuff we talk about.

They don't have to obsess over my dick or yours. I feel like, where I come from, people are afraid to talk about sex. People can come here talk about sex, empty there frustrations and get comfortable. After that, maybe they can learn something (not necessarily from this site) have more conversations about sex with there loved ones or even acquittances. To me the more things that out in the open, the better.

 

[galaxus]

^ Well, you've changed your tune quite a bit since your OP, where you specifically said you wanted to bring more women to the site. In terms of overall numbers and the variety of voices and viewpoints the site seems to be doing quite well, imo. I don't think we need a recruitment program, which could well attract a lower common denominator. Better if people are drawn here of their own accord

I didn't really design a recruiting plan. I wouldn't call it that. Its more like free advertising for the site.

People people can share the other interesting things this site can offer just by clicking the Digg button. People don't have to stay, but they can see that its more than just a Dick worshiping site.

 

[maxcok]

So would it hurt to seek out more of those exceptions?

Adding diversity doesn't mean just getting more women on here. It means getting men and women from many different cultures and backgrounds to talk about.... the stuff we talk about.

They don't have to obsess over my dick or yours. I feel like, where I come from, people are afraid to talk about sex. People can come here talk about sex, empty there frustrations and get comfortable. After that, maybe they can learn something (not necessarily from this site) have more conversations about sex with there loved ones or even acquittances. To me the more things that out in the open, the better.

I didn't really design a recruiting plan. I wouldn't call it that. Its more like free advertising for the site.

People people can share the other interesting things this site can offer just by clicking the Digg button. People don't have to stay, but they can see that its more than just a Dick worshiping site.

Think I already addressed all this in my post above. ^

 

[galaxus]

Think I already addressed all this in my post above. ^

How could we attract a lower common denominator then what we already have? You can't get much lower than this. You said it yourself "We're a dick worshiping site!"

I'm trying to raise it.

 

[maxcok]

How could we attract a lower common denominator then what we already have? You can't get much lower than this. You said it yourself "We're a dick worshiping site!"

I'm trying to raise it.

I didn't say that! Please don't make stuff up, put "quotes" around it and attribute it to me.
Try reading for comprehension, don't exaggerate and don't paraphrase.

What I actually said:

Whether they're male, female, gay or otherwise, there's bound to be some serious attention to dick going on. Another news flash. IT'S A BIG DICK SITE!!! WHAT DO YOU EXPECT??!!!

In terms of overall numbers and the variety of voices and viewpoints the site seems to be doing quite well, imo. I don't think we need a recruitment program, which could well attract a lower common denominator. Better if people are drawn here of their own accord.

In other words, to translate: since big dicks are the focus of the site, it's natural that there would be significant focus on that. I recognize there's lots more interesting stuff going on here and many intelligent people sharing views on a variety of topics. That's what keeps me and, I assume, much of the membership engaged beyond your run-of-the-mill sex site. Not that there's anything wrong with the dick focus at all. In fact, it often subtextually makes those other 'unrelated' discussions more intriquing. The attention purely on dicks is fine too, and I wouldn't call that the lowest common denominator by any means. Personally, I'm always down for some serious cokworship.

Again, please don't misquote me or put words in my mouth! Thanks.

 

[galaxus]

^ Ok my bad. But that's my point.

 

[maxcok]

^ Ok my bad. But that's my point.

Frankly, I don't know what your point is. It keeps changing.

At any rate, the consensus of the responders seems to be that your suggestion is at best unnecessary,
if not potentially detrimental.

 

[galaxus]

Frankly, I don't know what your point is. It keeps changing.

At any rate, the consensus of the responders seems to be that your suggestion is at best unnecessary,
if not potentially detrimental.

It never changed. If you didn't understand the original post, I explained what I meant on this page.

hell I'll just copy and paste for you:

I've only received a few PM's from very friendly gay dudes. I didn't come to this site to share my glorious dick. I came to this site to compare my dick size. I learned quickly that dick size really isn't that important unless its REALLY big or REALLY small.

I STAYED on this site because of the few interesting people here, especially the women in the women's section. I also stay because of the funny and interesting threads in the Etcetera section.

I want to bring in more members because I think this site has help me. Not for the porn it provides. Not to get women to look at my dick. Not to talk about big dicks with other people....

I feel this site has sexually liberated me. I can talk about sex, taboos, and all kinds of naughty things here. I can even discuss morality, spirituality, and politics with some of the more intelligent members.

I want new members to bring in new minds. To get more people talking about things they might be afraid to talk about. Things like sex, homophobia, and ect. They don't necessarily have to be women, but that would be great too.

With help of the internet, the anonymity on this site might bring out our ugly sides and ideas, but it also helps us reveal things that are hidden within us.

And of course its unnecessary. It's just suppose to be fun. You don't have to agree with me.

 

[Wish-4-8]

Just treat the ladies that are already here nice.
Its the stupid members that chased them away or got them to take down their galleries and pics. Even the avatars have changed!

And more new members? Asking the same stupid 10 questions that have been asked over and over? Newbies who never read the forum rules?

Only the strongest of the ladies have survived here, with all the leghumper attacks. And only special ladies are here. This site does not attract your normal everday lady. And yes, this has been discussed many times under different contexts. So lets just be nice to the ones we are blessed to have. They are nice too if you treat them that way.

 

[maxcok]

Frankly, I don't know what your point is. It keeps changing.

It never changed. If you didn't understand the original post, I explained what I meant on this page.

hell I'll just copy and paste for you:

Condescension noted. Your intent is clear in your first two posts in the thread.
I don't think they require any "explaining" (backtracking). We can read.

Hell, I'll just copy and paste for you:

We could make this site much more diverse.... or better yet..... *GASP*.... have more regular posters who are actually female!!!

Just wanna see more than dick worshipping, gay men on here. Not that there is anything wrong with that.

Just looking for a lil diversity.

At any rate, you're beyond tiresome, and I am done here.

Do continue tapdancing if you like.

 

[maxcok]

Just treat the ladies that are already here nice.
Its the stupid members that chased them away or got them to take down their galleries and pics. Even the avatars have changed!

And more new members? Asking the same stupid 10 questions that have been asked over and over? Newbies who never read the forum rules?

Only the strongest of the ladies have survived here, with all the leghumper attacks. And only special ladies are here. This site does not attract your normal everday lady. And yes, this has been discussed many times under different contexts. So lets just be nice to the ones we are blessed to have. They are nice too if you treat them that way.

Well said.

 

[lopo2000]

I think LPSG have many members already. I'm very impressed with the number.

 

[galaxus]

Condescension noted. Your intent is clear in your first two posts in the thread.
I don't think they require any "explaining" (backtracking). We can read.

Hell, I'll just copy and paste for you:



At any rate, you're beyond tiresome, and I am done here.

Do continue tapdancing if you like.

The first couple posts were meant to be funny too. Obviously you didn't think so. I'm glad you are done. It took you three pages to say that you think it was a bad idea. So just don't worry about the thread and go.

I also think we should treat the ladies with respect too. We all should treat each other with respect. But to say we shouldn't do this because we're scared of trolling is a silly argument. Thats why we have moderators. And usually they do a nice job. So let them do their job and moderate things.

 

[maxcok]

The first couple posts were meant to be funny too. Obviously you didn't think so.

Whatever humor you may have intended, your motives were clear from the beginning. Now you're revising your position to make it more acceptable and try to get someone to agree with you. (tapdancing)

I'm glad you are done. It took you three pages to say that you think it was a bad idea.

I'm hardly alone in telling you it's a bad idea. In fact, as far as I can see, everybody's told you it's a bad idea. Meanwhile, you keep tapdancing. See above. We're now on page two, I only addressed you once on page one, and I told you then it was a bad idea. How do you figure it "took three pages" for me to say it's a bad idea?

You just love to exaggerate, dontcha? If you think that strengthens your point, whatever your point is, it does exactly the opposite. We can read. We can count. We're not stupid.

So just don't worry about the thread and go.

I'm not worried about your stupid thread. I'll go when I'm damn good and ready. I'll go sooner if you stop addressing me, stop misquoting me, stop exaggerating, stop misrepresenting, stop revising, stop making shit up. See above. Again.

I also think we should treat the ladies with respect too. We all should treat each other with respect. But to say we shouldn't do this because we're scared of trolling is a silly argument.

It is a silly argument. No one advanced that argument, so your 'point' is specious.
Actually, pretty much all your points are specious.

:1244:

 

[Lex]

to the OP: I think you should focus on your socialization abilities and leave the site growth to the owner and administrators.

Just because you have found "only a few interesting people" here and have not gotten a chance to compare your cock to someone else's does not imply that something is wrong with the site.

In fact, given how relatively easy it is to find people with whom to PM, cam, chat and converse here, I would suggest that the site is running along as planned and perhaps you need to get on board more.

 

[galaxus]

Lex, I did compare my cock years ago. I was over that in like a month. I dont care about that now. I never said there was something wrong with the site. I was just coming up with ideas to make it better.

And Maxcok, You seem to edit out my arguments in your quotes. How can you complain about the same actions that you do? I told you that the moderators need to keep up the great work they do to prevent trolling if my idea backfires.

Im not attacking. I don't even want to argue with you because you just shoot down my every post. You said you were done. So be done.

 

[maxcok]

And Maxcok, You seem to edit out my arguments in your quotes. How can you complain about the same actions that you do?

And that would be another deflection and another blatant misrepresentation. If you look up the page, you will see where I quoted your posts in their entirety. Later I quoted specific statements within your post to respond to, which anyone can click on to read the post in full. I'm not going to waste space and bandwidth requoting the entire text again and again. You on the other hand have exaggerated, paraphrased, and even made up statements and attributed them to me, going so far as to put them in quotation marks, as you did here:

You said it yourself "We're a dick worshiping site!"

But of course I never said that at all. You should be grateful that I have honestly quoted your actual words. But then you're busy trying to backtrack from statements you made earlier in the thread, so that's a problem for you, isn't it?

Dude, it's very simple. Backtracking aside, you simply want there to be more women on the board. Nothing wrong with that. Most people here would probably welcome that, myself included. However, it has been pointed out to you by several intelligent people why the "grand idea" you propose is not only bad, it is highly unlikely to bring about the result you want. Yet you persist, revising and recrafting your arguments in a vain attempt to defend yourself and get someone, anyone to agree with you.

I'm not even sure that what you propose is allowed under the ToS. At any rate the Et Cetera Forum is not the right place for this. If you have suggestions for how to improve the site, there's a forum specifically for that:

Questions, Comments and Suggestions
For general questions about using LPSG, site issues, and site improvements.

Im not attacking. I don't even want to argue with you because you just shoot down my every post. You said you were done. So be done.

No, you don't want me to respond because you look increasingly foolish with every post. I'm shooting you down, which is my prerogative, because you continue to be stubborn, deflective and dishonest. And foolishly you continue to be so after being advised:

I'll go when I'm damn good and ready. I'll go sooner if you stop addressing me, stop misquoting me, stop exaggerating, stop misrepresenting, stop revising, stop making shit up. See above. Again.

:1244:

......^ (still tapdancing) Seriously, the more you pursue this, the more you look like an idiot. You should stop.

 

[ColoradoGuy]

How could we attract a lower common denominator then what we already have? You can't get much lower than this. You said it yourself "We're a dick worshiping site!"

I'm trying to raise it.

Wow... I opened this thread thinking I was interested in hearing your idea. After reading your posts and learning that you think the site is full of "lower common denominators", I have some advice: perhaps you should vote with your feet and leave. I have no problem with the quantity or the quality of the membership as it is.