I know I`m a fucking intellecual

[Sergeant_Torpedo]

are they X-ray prescriptions?

 

[Calboner]

The sum of the square roots of any two sides of an isosceles triangle is equal to the square root of the remaining side. Oh joy! Rapture! I got a brain!

Am I the only person here to notice how wildly wrong this is? Consider, for instance, an isosceles triangle ABC in which sides AB and CB are of length 2 and side AC of length 1. So √(AB+CB) = √(2+2) = 2 while √AC = √1 = 1. Not equal.

 

[maxcok]

Am I the only person here to notice how wildly wrong this is? Consider, for instance, an isosceles triangle ABC in which sides AB and CB are of length 2 and side AC of length 1. So √(AB+CB) = √(2+2) = 2 while √AC = √1 = 1. Not equal.

You are a fucking intellectual!

 

[Calboner]

Youare a fucking intellectual!

No, I'm not! I don't wear glasses!

 

[big_tits4big_dicks]

Am I the only person here to notice how wildly wrong this is? Consider, for instance, an isosceles triangle ABC in which sides AB and CB are of length 2 and side AC of length 1. So √(AB+CB) = √(2+2) = 2 while √AC = √1 = 1. Not equal.

Dare you question the Scarecrow!? He just got his brain, be polite!

 

[maxcok]

You are a fucking intellectual!

No, I'm not! I don't wear glasses!

You don't have to wear them when you're fucking.

 

[Calboner]

Dare you question the Scarecrow!? He just got his brain, be polite!

So the pseudo-theorem was an allusion to The Wizard of Oz? Sorry, I missed it. I am straight, you know.

 

[Smooth88]

Luka..... hun..... Hush please. That is all.

 

[luka82]

are they X-ray prescriptions?

But of course!:wink:

Am I the only person here to notice how wildly wrong this is?

I do not read posts that don`t concern me!:biggrin1:

No, I'm not! I don't wear glasses!

Could be true!:biggrin1:

You don't have to wear them when you're fucking.

Yes, you do!:wink:

Luka..... hun..... Hush please. That is all.

Yeah, you think?:smile:

 

[B_Hickboy]

Fucking intellecuals like you give me a reason to post here.

 

[maxcok]

Fucking intellecuals like you give me a reason to post here.

You like fucking intellectuals and then posting about it?

Did I get that straight?

 

[B_Hickboy]

You like fucking intellectuals and then posting about it?

Did I get that straight?

You got it right.

 

[Calboner]

Fucking intellecuals like you give me a reason to post here.

You like fucking intellectuals and then posting about it?

Did I get that straight?

Like Luka, he wrote "intellecuals." Maybe that's the new "nucular."

 

[maxcok]

You got it right.

Wow. I feel like a fucking intellectual.


Or do I feel like fucking an intellectual?


Hmm . . . I wonder . . .

 

[maxcok]

Maybe that's the new "nucular."

GWB was a fucking intellecual!

 

[luka82]

Fucking intellecuals like you give me a reason to post here.

Like Luka, he wrote "intellecuals." Maybe that's the new "nucular."

Wow. I feel like a fucking intellectual.


Or do I feel like fucking an intellectual?


Hmm . . . I wonder . . .

Fucking wannabes!!!!:biggrin1:

 

[lopo2000]

I can already smell your hotness + nerdiness!

 

[luka82]

I can already smell your hotness + nerdiness!

You saying I smell bad?:biggrin1:

 

[lopo2000]

You saying I smell bad?:biggrin1:

Unless hotness should equate to bad smelling, no...

Well, you do smell good right?

 

[big_tits4big_dicks]

So the pseudo-theorem was an allusion to The Wizard of Oz? Sorry, I missed it. I am straight, you know.

You never saw the Wizard of Oz???? Sorry, I thought that was an easy one. Every kid saw that movie, I don't know what sexual preference has to do with it. That movie is an amazing piece of film history.