I think the 100% str8 never had a sexual thought about a man str8 guys are a minority
- Thread starter B_theaussieone
- Start date
Ok OP, so by your reckoning surely that means most gay men have had sexual thoughts about women? And most lesbians have had sexual thoughts about men??
Well I am gay & I can say that I have never had sexual thoughts about women, I'm not bi, curious or a closeted straight, so why would you think that most straight men would be at the least curious?!?
If some straight men have these thoughts then they are bi-curious & if they act on those thoughts & like it, then they are bi, simple really...
And yes I do label people, those who don't agree with labels are almost always bisexual & can't admit it to themselves... :wink:
Well I am gay & I can say that I have never had sexual thoughts about women, I'm not bi, curious or a closeted straight, so why would you think that most straight men would be at the least curious?!?
If some straight men have these thoughts then they are bi-curious & if they act on those thoughts & like it, then they are bi, simple really...
And yes I do label people, those who don't agree with labels are almost always bisexual & can't admit it to themselves... :wink:
I wasn't going to dignify this thread with a post, but COME ON...
Next thing I know you are going to say things like "the more you deny it, the more it must be true".
If you start a thread be prepared to take criticism as a big boy.
OT: You are so wrong. By definition 0% of the straight boys and girls have had a fantasy about gay sex. There are people that filled out their percentage on this site wrong, but they are definitely NOT the majority.
And I don't care what Gore Vidal says, there is such a thing as homosexual and heterosexual.
Shame Kinsey's research is older than some of our parents. I don't understand American obsession with only 2 dimensions!
Sexuality is not just us/them with some grey area for gays to gain prizes for "outing straights."
Sexuality is a fluid dynamic that is defined by thought, action and feeling. After all, where do the people who fuck animals go? Or necrophiliacs? Or people with extreme fetishes that are independant of gender (like scat, vomit etc). It's cruely amusing when even sex with a minor is brought up, the first instict is "HE'S NOT ONE OF US!"
Not even counting the pansexuals or even the asexuals. Asexuals are part of the spectrum of sexuality, even if they are not defined by it, because they can LOVE.
Sexuality and love are different things also and are not taken into account. It is possible to love one gender and prefer the company of others for sexual needs. Or not to even need physical but rather emotional comforts, or to be a blurred spectrum of all or even NONE of the above.
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2006
- Posts
- 9,460
- Media
- 36
- Likes
- 7,853
- Points
- 458
- Location
- near Monterey, Calif.
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 50% Straight, 50% Gay
- Gender
- Male
You HOMOPHOBE!! :tongue:
Will your mind change after the 101 millionth?? :biggrin1:
Seriously, "sexual thoughts" mean different things to different people. To the guy who thinks that ALL straight guys" are only a beer away, ANY thought gives them hope.
To those who aren't so tightly wound, it's completely different. :smile:
no, actually, not everyone "sometimes wants to have sex with their own gender"
sorry, there is nothing more of a turn off to me than the thought of sticking my dick inside a guys hairy/shitty asshole.
as far as looking at dicks, yeah, i guess i get some kind of satisfaction from it, when i watch porn i want to see a guy with a big/thick dick fucking the girl, if its a blowjob video, then yeah, i want the dick to be a big/fat dick getting sucked, but that doesnt mean i fantasize about fucking men, far from it. thats like saying girls who look/appreciate another girls big round perky tits, fantasizes about fucking girls because they enjoy looking at one body part, its just wrong ..
sorry, there is nothing more of a turn off to me than the thought of sticking my dick inside a guys hairy/shitty asshole.
as far as looking at dicks, yeah, i guess i get some kind of satisfaction from it, when i watch porn i want to see a guy with a big/thick dick fucking the girl, if its a blowjob video, then yeah, i want the dick to be a big/fat dick getting sucked, but that doesnt mean i fantasize about fucking men, far from it. thats like saying girls who look/appreciate another girls big round perky tits, fantasizes about fucking girls because they enjoy looking at one body part, its just wrong ..
you have to understand, that it seems the gay mans ultimate fantasy is sucking a "straight" guys dick, or converting a straight guy, this is why there is thread after thread where gay guys constantly try to tell everyone there is no such thing as straight and we all secretly want to fuck men in the ass but wont admit it. furthermore they go as far as to classify themselves, the ones fucking men in the ass, as straight guys just having sex with men. pretty crazy stuff.
For a good understanding, I didn't say homosexuality and heterosexuality are the only sexualities, but they do exist. 100% heteros and 100% homos aren't a myth.
Op seems to claim there are no 100% straight guys, which obviously is not true...
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2010
- Posts
- 1,599
- Media
- 202
- Likes
- 174
- Points
- 183
- Location
- Washington/Arizona
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Actually, the title of the thread quite plainly states that he thinks they're a MINORITY.
It's posters like yourself who completely flip their shit at the idea that someone, somewhere might possibly entertain the notion for one fleeting instant that you, yourself, might be one of us disgusting homo-sex-chuals who erroneously insist that all gay men doubt that there exists even one man on earth that has never considered a same-sex tryst.
That's you guys being overly defensive and laying your unresolved insecurities on the OP. Let's be clear.
Kinsey's own scientific study supports both the OP's position and yours. Yes, there were 100% straight guys and 100% gay guys. Most of the subjects fell somewhere in between.
Unless you care to fund your own University Research Grant to conduct your own study to challenge these results, why don't you consider accepting the fact that you're both right and just give this old dead horse a rest?
In theory you could have a 0% gay man who doesn't care for sex but just wants a hug from a man every so often.
Blargh, this is yet another troll thread and the hour is late in Britland.
Let's get this straight. If OP thinks it's a minority and not all straight guys, he's still wrong. But that is not what matters to me, people are wrong all the time.
If you read this thread again you'll see that I flip my shit at those 'arguments' like the one you just brought up "That's you guys being overly defensive and laying you insecurities on the OP."
What can one say against this argument except for saying once more that it's not true? Ah and saying it's not true is denying it more, so it must be even more true?
It's this kind of arguing that gets me riled up, not the stupid and, let's face it, totally redundant post of op.
Actually the only thing I really would like to say on the OP is this: All people claiming to be 100% straight denied what the op said.
Who are you to say those people are wrong?
Let me turn this around for a second.
What if I said "I think only a minority of the gay comunity is really gay. Gay people are actually straight people who chose to fuck other guys in the ass because they just can't get any pussy."
Offended yet? Well try denying it, because as soon as you try to deny it I'm going to say that denying it is just a proof of it being true. Because when you deny it, you are being overly defensive and laying your insecurities on me. Then all of the sudden you are flipping your shit, and oh man, you are definitely a pussy lover. Because if you get angry when I say this dumb shit, it definitely must be true. What if I made some stupid suggestion that what op and you said are YOUR insecurities being laid un US.
Good thing I don't do stupid stuff like that. I just think you are dumb.
You see how you and op make no sense?
I don't have a position or care about the outcome just here point out a logical fallacy in this discussion.
The OP is saying he believes that 100% straight men and I'm assuming 100% gay men are a rarity and that most men fall somewhere in the middle. The problem comes when the responses are something along the lines of this:
"You are wrong because I am 100% straight therefore they exist and because they do in fact exist they must be the majority of men"!
The problem with this as an argument is that as an individual you can only speak for yourself so while you can prove that at the very least 1 100% straight man exists you can't that they are the majority are that there are any other than you. The flip side to that is that neither can the OP prove his that the majority of men fall somewhere in between. Both his statement and the response statements are only opinions.
The only way either side could prove their position would be to do a study that was of a large enough size and included wide enough demographics to demonstrably show where most men on the planet fell. Since as far as I know hat hasn't been done yet you're really only arguing personal preference.
The OP is saying he believes that 100% straight men and I'm assuming 100% gay men are a rarity and that most men fall somewhere in the middle. The problem comes when the responses are something along the lines of this:
"You are wrong because I am 100% straight therefore they exist and because they do in fact exist they must be the majority of men"!
The problem with this as an argument is that as an individual you can only speak for yourself so while you can prove that at the very least 1 100% straight man exists you can't that they are the majority are that there are any other than you. The flip side to that is that neither can the OP prove his that the majority of men fall somewhere in between. Both his statement and the response statements are only opinions.
The only way either side could prove their position would be to do a study that was of a large enough size and included wide enough demographics to demonstrably show where most men on the planet fell. Since as far as I know hat hasn't been done yet you're really only arguing personal preference.
Here we go again. I really wonder if you really believe the bullshit you are writing. I wonder why that's ALWAYS the only argument some gay guys (I say some, because luckily it's a dumb minority) can bring when it's about straight guys stating that they're definitely not interested in other men and defend their point of view.
Similar threads
