Symphonic's profile say's he's still a member so, he's hasn't been banned?
"I want this person gone!" threads
- Thread starter Gillette
- Start date
Symphonic's profile say's he's still a member so, he's hasn't been banned?
B_Nick4444
Expert Member
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2007
- Posts
- 6,849
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 108
- Points
- 193
- Location
- San Antonio, TX
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Where's the post alert button? I was looking for something like that last night and I couldn't find anything that said post alert.
Drifterwood
Superior Member
I am thinking of the wider cases when people argue on this site, I admit.
If I start an argument with you, dear Rubi, and am deeply insulting, imo, anything you say either in retaliation or defense is mitigated by your right to defend yourself. We are not both equally guilty.
If someone is dumb enough to think they can bully someone else because they think they are a lot stronger, smarter etc, I think that there is some natural justice when they find out that the community will not tolerate their behaviour.
I can think of many instances where threads could be construed to be harassment.
D_Gunther Snotpole
Account Disabled
Lower left-hand corner of each post.
(Exclamation mark in gold diamond in black circle.)
B_Nick4444
Expert Member
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2007
- Posts
- 6,849
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 108
- Points
- 193
- Location
- San Antonio, TX
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
now I'm really confused
can't find anything even closely resembling ....
ah, well! back to real life
D_Gunther Snotpole
Account Disabled
But this rule simply touches on where you can make your retaliation.
I agree, but that doesn't mean a new thread for that specific purpose should be tolerated.
True enough, but the clearest of them ... those that from the opening post have the intention of attacking a member, and never mind the reason ... should be disallowed from the outset.
Actually, that sounds more emphatic than I wish to be.
But to set a policy of not allowing such threads is entirely justiable.
And that policy, once established, should be enforced consistently, as far as that's possible.
That's all I'm saying.
(And Drifter, I love any and all pain you send my way ... but you knew that.:wink
now I'm really confused
can't find anything even closely resembling ....
ah, well! back to real life
I think txgirl might be confusing "marriage gone south" thread with the one that was closed, symphonic was abusive there also.
faceking
Cherished Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2004
- Posts
- 7,426
- Media
- 6
- Likes
- 282
- Points
- 208
- Location
- Mavs, NOR * CAL
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
D_Gunther Snotpole
Account Disabled
Thanks faceking,
I definately won't forget where that is located. :smile: Pretty cool.
Especially when there are threads like this.
This site take's more turns than a june bug with his ass on fire.
I've said it before but, this site should be named "The Hung and the Breathless".
D_Gunther Snotpole
Account Disabled
Playing with matches again?
"The Pneumatics and the Athsmatics"?
No?
(I tried ...)
Drifterwood
Superior Member
But this rule simply touches on where you can make your retaliation.
(And Drifter, I love any and all pain you send my way ... but you knew that.:wink
A tear to your eye, Rubi
So when someone is abusive in Chat, it shouldn't be discussed elsewhere?
When someone is abusive via PM it shouldn't be discussed elsewhere?