Even more hate, now I'm being accused of protecting people. If anything I've added to this thread, nobody posted any responses before me. If you think it's fair to release a list of the names of people in hate groups, then the same should be alright for any other type of group. Anybody on LPSG gets their name released, anyone who is gay. I was trying to open your mind a little bit, hating is only perpetuating all the shit in the world.
To make something clear, I said that you have to respect someone's right to believe whatever they want. Not that you have to respect what they believe or how they act on those beliefs.
I haven't been hostile to anyone on this thread, and look at all the hate coming back at me. Use semantics as much as you want, but it's hate.
The three examples posted pale in comparison to the civil rights movement. I never said homosexuals haven't been persecuted, obviously they have, but it's simply uncomparable to what happened during the civil rights movements.
If were going to talk about ethics let's talk about this topic. You want to release a list of the names of people in hate groups. Why? So all the people who are strongly opposed to them will go commit murders in the name of their cause. It's this kind of thinking that causes situations like in the middle east, where everyone hates each other because one time long ago something happened, and people can't let go of their hate. You are the same people.
I don't know of any hate groups in my area, I know the KKK has come to my state to protest something or other, but I didn't pay much attention. If I did know people in a hate group I wouldn't release their name to the public, I think that's pretty unethical. That's the equivalent of name all the jews you knew in Germany in 1935. I don't think anyone deserves to die (or be the subject of hate) for believing what they believe.
Here comes some more hipocrisy...
To make something clear, I said that you have to respect someone's right to believe whatever they want. Not that you have to respect what they believe or how they act on those beliefs.
IntactMale said:I understand that most people aren't able to feel the same way as i do about this issue. But I don't think it's right to persecute anyone for their beliefs, whether they act on it or not is different.
I respect that the K.K.K. has an opinion and that they have every right to have that opinion. I don't respect some of the things they have done in the name of their belief. But I believe they have every right to try and influence the world in their way. They are people too and have the same inalienable rights as anyone else.
I haven't been hostile to anyone on this thread, and look at all the hate coming back at me. Use semantics as much as you want, but it's hate.
The three examples posted pale in comparison to the civil rights movement. I never said homosexuals haven't been persecuted, obviously they have, but it's simply uncomparable to what happened during the civil rights movements.
If were going to talk about ethics let's talk about this topic. You want to release a list of the names of people in hate groups. Why? So all the people who are strongly opposed to them will go commit murders in the name of their cause. It's this kind of thinking that causes situations like in the middle east, where everyone hates each other because one time long ago something happened, and people can't let go of their hate. You are the same people.
I don't know of any hate groups in my area, I know the KKK has come to my state to protest something or other, but I didn't pay much attention. If I did know people in a hate group I wouldn't release their name to the public, I think that's pretty unethical. That's the equivalent of name all the jews you knew in Germany in 1935. I don't think anyone deserves to die (or be the subject of hate) for believing what they believe.
Here comes some more hipocrisy...