If the foreskin wasn't part of the penis

Discussion in 'The Healthy Penis' started by lokican, Sep 19, 2007.

  1. lokican

    lokican Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2004
    Messages:
    221
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Canada
    Before all you posters go on moaning on another circumcison thread (btw why not just not read them?) I was wondering if the foreskin wasn't attached to the penis, say for arguments sake on your index finger, do you think it would be as controversial removing it?
     
  2. Dave NoCal

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2006
    Messages:
    1,995
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    256
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Sacramento (CA, US)
    Do you think that if the foreskin was attached to a non-erogenous part of the body there would be any perceived need to routinely remove it?
     
  3. DC_DEEP

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Messages:
    9,029
    Likes Received:
    12
    Not if it was my choice to remove it. If that choice was made by another person, yes, it would be controversial to me.
     
  4. jason_els

    jason_els <img border="0" src="/images/badges/gold_member.gi

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2004
    Messages:
    10,576
    Likes Received:
    25
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Warwick, NY, USA
    Actually I'd rather have it on my nose. Would make cunnilingus more stimulating for sure.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted