If you had the Chimp Attack injuries, would you want to live?

Flashy

Sexy Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Posts
7,901
Media
0
Likes
27
Points
183
Location
at home
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
That may well be the case, but the fact is that from time to time, chimps do carry out vicious,often lethal attack on other primates, be they chimps, baboons or humans. Just Google "chimp attack" for more information. The bottom line is chimps are not pets.

i know they are not pets, nor do i advocate them being kept as pets.

i am a member of several groups dedicated to keeping chimps out of research, entertainment and pet situations...

that was not my point...my point was that chimps are not "malicious".
 

Viking_UK

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2007
Posts
1,226
Media
0
Likes
148
Points
283
Location
Scotland
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I'm not sure I'd agree with that. I think that they can be under certain circumstances. As I said before, there have been plenty of reports of chimps forming what could be classed as raiding parties and hunting down an individual from a neighbring group. There doesn't seem to be any reason of competition for food or territory in most of the cases I've read about, but whatever the reason for it, there's obviously a degree of premeditation and organisation involved. I'm not quite sure if that counts as malice, but if it doesn't it's not too far off.
 

Gillette

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Posts
6,214
Media
4
Likes
95
Points
268
Age
52
Location
Halifax (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
my point was that chimps are not "malicious".

I'm not sure I'd agree with that. I think that they can be under certain circumstances. As I said before, there have been plenty of reports of chimps forming what could be classed as raiding parties and hunting down an individual from a neighbring group. There doesn't seem to be any reason of competition for food or territory in most of the cases I've read about, but whatever the reason for it, there's obviously a degree of premeditation and organisation involved. I'm not quite sure if that counts as malice, but if it doesn't it's not too far off.
It could be a territorial dispute or tribal retribution for something the human observers didn't catch. Sure, malice could be involved but as you said yourself, that's "under certain circumstances". The same applies to virtually every species. SC's categorization of an entire species as malicious based on a rarely displayed trait is foolish.
 

Flashy

Sexy Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Posts
7,901
Media
0
Likes
27
Points
183
Location
at home
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I'm not sure I'd agree with that. I think that they can be under certain circumstances. As I said before, there have been plenty of reports of chimps forming what could be classed as raiding parties and hunting down an individual from a neighbring group. There doesn't seem to be any reason of competition for food or territory in most of the cases I've read about, but whatever the reason for it, there's obviously a degree of premeditation and organisation involved. I'm not quite sure if that counts as malice, but if it doesn't it's not too far off.

neighboring groups represent a very real threat to territory and food for virtually all animals.

a dominant neighboring male can be a danger to the weaker adults and females and especially young and infants of the group.

one need look no further than the former dominant alpha male in Gombe, Frodo...even Jane Goodall would not go near him without two bodyguards present.

the fact is that they go after dominant males, much like humans, and they do so in many cases by forging alliances, where they elevate the leader they want to the top position, and they do so, by beating the alpha male severely in many cases, precisely so that he knows he does not hold sway any more

what you spoke of, the targeting of certain individuals, occurs specifically for certain reasons...it is not done out of malice or spite.

Goliath, who was the alpha male when Goodall arrived, was eventually deposed by a lower rival, and as he aged, he became less and less powerful in the group...instead of accepting his place in the order he left his group (The Kasakela chimps) to form a brand new group (The Kahama)...he was later beaten and killed by the same group that formed the senior males of his old group.

and in fact, even Jane goodall has said that the elevated levels of violence and "Chimp wars" that were observed in Gombe, were the result of the interference of researchers such as herself in terms of them offering constant food to the chimps, so that they could be studied more closely.

"I didn't see aggression to start with. There's no question that chimpanzees become more aggressive as a result of crowding, as a result of competition for food.
It's very hard to look back with hindsight and say oh well I would have done it differently. If I had gone to Gombe and had access to information about the effect of feeding bananas on wild chimpanzees I wouldn't have done it"


And in studies of several other groups of chimps in other locations, none of them have observed this heightened level of violence or killing over and above any normal levels of aggression, bravado and display

in fact , the prime evidence that they are *NOT* malicious, is that they choose display, bravado, and light violence, (beating with the hands) over more injurious or lethal forms of violence.

they will display, throw branches, rip bushes, shriek etc, to warn off possible further conflict...one particular male, "Mike", even learned back in the 60s that he could make his displays even more fearsome by incorporating many of the researchers every day tools into his displays (their metal cups, for example could be banged to make a fearsome noise)
 
Last edited:

tripod

Legendary Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Posts
6,670
Media
14
Likes
1,854
Points
333
Location
USA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Flashy's right. Primates are nowhere near as violent as humans... they don't even eat meat, preferring to peruse nature's salad bar that is the forest canopy.

The aggression is not inherent, but situational... I mean, every creature has their own type of aggression.

I love how people like to look down on the animal as being wild and violent, when man is the most violent creature that has ever inhabited the earth.
 

D_Gunther Snotpole

Account Disabled
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Posts
13,632
Media
0
Likes
73
Points
193
Primates are nowhere near as violent as humans... they don't even eat meat, preferring to peruse nature's salad bar that is the forest canopy.

Not quite true, tripod.
Years ago, Jane Goodal showed that chimps eat insects.
It has since been learned that they eat other meat as well, though such consumption tends to be sporadic. Minute quantities, really, compared to the usual human intake ... exactly what your cardiologist might recommend for all of us.
 

D_Hyacinth Harrytwat

Account Disabled
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Posts
883
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
101
The aggression is not inherent, but situational... I mean, every creature has their own type of aggression.

I love how people like to look down on the animal as being wild and violent, when man is the most violent creature that has ever inhabited the earth.

I can definitely agree to the situational aggression. I was focusing on that without really specifying that I didn't mean "always" and "forever" in terms of their violence.

And human's do some of the same things as chimps! How about that famous boxer who tried to bite that one man's ear off, for sport?
 

D_Kissimmee Coldsore

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2007
Posts
526
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
103
Not quite true, tripod.
Years ago, Jane Goodal showed that chimps eat insects.
It has since been learned that they eat other meat as well, though such consumption tends to be sporadic. Minute quantities, really, compared to the usual human intake ... exactly what your cardiologist might recommend for all of us.
They've also been shown to cannibalise enemies.