In a perfect world, would you be cut or uncut?

In a perfect world, would you be cut or uncut

  • Cut

    Votes: 318 33.3%
  • Uncut

    Votes: 638 66.7%

  • Total voters
    956

mdc

1st Like
Joined
Nov 7, 2005
Posts
53
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
151
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
In a perfect world, nobody would have any idea what "cut" meant. Of course, you could have as short or long a foreskin as you like too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: auncut10in

Pappy

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2004
Posts
2,072
Media
0
Likes
21
Points
258
Location
Outta Here
Dr Rock said:
this is really the most pointless poll i've yet seen on here (and look around: that's saying A LOT). in an "ideal world", people wouldn't go around cutting bits off of other people's dicks in the first place. :duh:


In a perfect world you wouldn't be so angry and narcissistic all the time
 

Love-it

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2005
Posts
1,829
Media
0
Likes
17
Points
183
Age
34
Location
Northern California
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Uncut and wouldn't have it any other way. In high school, almost 40 years ago, I was the only natural in my PE classes and track and cross country. I caught some flack but I was and am proud. I am a grower and while most comments were foreskin related a few were about my "small dick", but my 6.5" long x 6.25" girth, erect, works for me.
 

Peter Wood

Mythical Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2004
Posts
4,468
Media
35
Likes
33,558
Points
518
Age
73
Location
Provincie Utrecht, NL
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
In a perfect world no one would have chosen for cut as it is un-natural.
If necessary for medical reasons you have no choice. For religious reasons the choice has to be made by the man himself and not by his parents.
I'm glad to live in a country were circumcission is not automatically done at young born boys.
 

DC_DEEP

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2005
Posts
8,712
Media
0
Likes
101
Points
183
Sexuality
No Response
I guess I am in a perfect world, I still have my foreskin and I'm glad I do. I also had my appendix, my tonsils, and my wisdom teeth until they became problematic. I guess if I ever develop problems with the foreskin, then I'll have it removed... but never just "because everyone else does it."
 

Snakebyte

Superior Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2005
Posts
9,998
Media
0
Likes
6,824
Points
708
dikkiedik said:
In a perfect world no one would have chosen for cut as it is un-natural.
If necessary for medical reasons you have no choice. For religious reasons the choice has to be made by the man himself and not by his parents.
I'm glad to live in a country were circumcission is not automatically done at young born boys.

I've chosen myself to be circumcised because it looks nicer imo. Not to forget that it's easier to keep clean.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flyrye and Mcuthigh

Jason

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Aug 26, 2004
Posts
15,653
Media
63
Likes
5,112
Points
433
Location
London (Greater London, England)
Verification
View
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
In a perfect world the needless mutilation of children would not happen. Infant circumcision is wrong, period, just as it is wrong for parents to cut of a baby's finger. It is mutilation, and it is a form of abuse. It should be illegal, and should carry the sort of gaol sentence that - for example - cutting off a baby's finger would.

Religion does not make it acceptable. Many Jewish communities are moving away from circumsision, particularly in the UK. Thank God!

Soietal norms in the US do not make it acceptable there. It is a barbaric practice, and there needs to be a proper lobby in the US to make people realise that is wrong and get legal change.

If you are cut and happy with it, or make this choice as an adult, great. If it is needed for medical reasons, fine. But these are different issues - lets be clear that mutilation of babies for any reason whatsoever is wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnnnSmithhh