In the next world war...

[rbkwp]

doubt Xis going to take any notice of Trumps likely undiplomatic BS grievance re the unfortunate students death

as if either has any influence over the NK honcho
s'head Trump may as well start realising almost every world leader will be laughing behind his back as soon as theyve parted
has absolutely no credibility going for him

The US and China meet to discuss North Korea. The inaugural session of the US-China Diplomatic and Security Dialogue, which presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinpinglaunched after their April summit, will focus onjoint efforts to curb Pyongyang’s nuclear program.

 

[rbkwp]

F'n ridiculous
having a dozensailing around the world, sick sick sick

plenty of other humanitarian things to spend your billions on
try to make the world think great things of the USA again

CHINA/INDIA and others will be heading that way

How America’s Aircraft Carriers Could Become Obsolete
Modern missiles make them vulnerable. A $13 billion price tag makes them expensive. New technology may make them unnecessary.

America’s aircraft carriers could become obsolete. Trump has repeatedly said he wants the U.S. Navy to expand, including a fleet of a dozen aircraft carriers. However, modern missiles make them vulnerable, a $13 billion price tag makes them expensive, and new technology may make them unnecessary.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...r&utm_term=170628&utm_campaign=bloombergdaily

 

[green26]

F'n ridiculous
having a dozensailing around the world, sick sick sick

plenty of other humanitarian things to spend your billions on
try to make the world think great things of the USA again

CHINA/INDIA and others will be heading that way

How America’s Aircraft Carriers Could Become Obsolete
Modern missiles make them vulnerable. A $13 billion price tag makes them expensive. New technology may make them unnecessary.

America’s aircraft carriers could become obsolete. Trump has repeatedly said he wants the U.S. Navy to expand, including a fleet of a dozen aircraft carriers. However, modern missiles make them vulnerable, a $13 billion price tag makes them expensive, and new technology may make them unnecessary.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...r&utm_term=170628&utm_campaign=bloombergdaily

Aircraft carriers are floating ducks, we need to go smaller and faster, not bigger and slower

 

[chrisrobin]

Aircraft carriers are floating ducks, we need to go smaller and faster, not bigger and slower

Should there be a "next world war"
and Corbyn is the prime minister for the uk
opposition will be negligible.
He's a pacifist, anti nuclear and just loves extremist terrorists he regards as peace fighters...
So its America. China and North Korea with the mix stirred (but not shaken) by the Russians.

Oh yes, in the event of a war involving the UK there would be a military takeover of the government by the armed forces....

 

[rbkwp]

so CHINA sensibly cautions/warns the US as well
both volatile nutters those two countries leaders
and dont be thinking TRUMP wont push the button to make a point, different reasons why he would do it compared to Ill
me thinks/me thoughts ha
watch/listen


China Warns Against ‘Negative’ U.S. Turn as Trump Raises Heat
China Warns of 'Negative' U.S. Turn

The remark, on a phone call between the two countries' presidents, was Xi Jinping’s first acknowledgment of rekindledtensions, following several assertive U.S. moves in Asia. Trump had called in part to advance talks on curbing North Korea’s nuclear weapons program, which have progressed little since Xi’s sunny April visit to Trump’s Florida resort.


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...turn-as-trump-raises-heat?cmpid=BBD070317_BIZ

 

[rbkwp]

give your Trump more reason to pre-empt with a 1st strike

North Korea Says It Has Successfully Tested ICBM

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/04/...4&nl=breaking-news&nlid=64436595&ref=headline

 

[185248]

give your Trump more reason to pre-empt with a 1st strike

North Korea Says It Has Successfully Tested ICBM

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/04/...4&nl=breaking-news&nlid=64436595&ref=headline

As long as it does not destroy his new toll road and plans for Donnie World in Indonesia...

It worries me a bit rb, when the senior military US General in this region, wishes us to go to war against our neighbours. You guys will be involved as well.

And who is starting it?....Donnie himself by his financial dealings. This man could not win an arm wrestle in a McDonalds.

 

[rbkwp]

possibly falls in with its demonic nature/behaviour v
almost an expectation
as i suggested Trump has 'different reasons'
i.e. stubborn childish vanity /that will encourage him
reason/excuse, 'poor me,the World hates me'.. and who let him in

as for any other spinoff wars, well
yep,our youngsters will be summonsed on

It worries me a bit rb, when the senior military US General in this region,

 

[rbkwp]

a least it appears the new SK President is not as panicky as the former

North Korea claims successful launch of intercontinental missile

North Korea launched a ballistic missile that flew for nearly 40 minutes before coming down in the Sea of Japan.

South Korea’s President Moon Jae-In convened an emergency meeting of his National Security Council to analyse the launch.

 

[rbkwp]

OLD news/ Published on Apr 13, 2017
World is One News, WION
only came upon them this am

Trump possible pre-empt re NK

rbkwp
talking shit some say,be REAL people
anythings possible with those nutters in power and information sharing with a thought/view/opinion is not fearmongering
others like to espout there own sort of shit!

Breaking: Trump drops Largest Non-Nuclear Bomb In Afghanistan

Published on Apr 13, 2017
The strike was carried out to neutralise an IS tunnel. The US has never used this bomb in its military operation. It has a blast radius of nearly 50 kms. A GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast Bomb, nicknamed MOAB, was dropped at 7pm(local time) Thursday

World is One News, WION examines global issues with in-depth analysis. We provide much more than the news of the day. Our aim is to empower people to explore their world.

 

[rbkwp]

USA THAD could be termed a provocation as well?
and we know CHINA could possibly exert more pessure on NK

Russia, China agree joint approach to North Korea, slam US over missile shield
Russia and China agree a joint position on North Korea designed to defuse tensions around its missile programme and both want Washington to halt deployment of a missile shield in South Korea.
and both want Washington to halt deployment of a missile shield in South Korea, the Russian Foreign Ministry said.

Where could a North Korean ICBM hit?
A weapons analyst says North Korea's latest missile could have a maximum range of 6,700 kilometres. That has the potential to hit "all of Alaska" and could also put US military bases in the Pacific within reach.

North Korea: How will Donald Trump respond to the intercontinental ballistic missile claim?

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-04/north-korea-icbm-claim-may-force-donald-trump-to-act/8677704

 

[rbkwp]

UN to Meet on North Korea as U.S. Confirms Rocket Was ICBM
North Korea
Yesterday's rocket test by Kim Jong Un's regime has been confirmed as North Korea's first intercontinental ballistic missile, raising the possibility that the country coulddevelop the capability to launch a direct nuclear attack on the U.S. The United Nations Security Council will hold an emergency meeting later today, with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson calling North Korea’s actions a "new escalation of the threat" to the U.S. and its allies. While financial markets in Seoul showed little signs of panic, there were increased indications that investors are seeking to protect themselves from further declines in the won

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...wsletter&utm_term=170705&utm_campaign=markets

Kim Jong Un Seeks to Exploit U.S.-China Tensions With Missile Claims

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...xploit-u-s-china-tensions-with-missile-claims

 

[rbkwp]

US threatens use of military force against North Korea

The US defence secretary has promised to protect Japan and provide he called 'extended deterrence' against North Korea's missile programme.

Earlier, Washington's ambassador to the UN warned of using military force in response to Pyongyang's latest ballistic missile test.

Xi May Put Ball Back in Trump’s Court on Talks With North Korea
By
Ting Shi
July 6, 2017 7:11 PM GMT+12:00July 6, 2017 9:14 PM GMT+12:00

So President Trump may find Xi pushing back if he tries to raise the pressure on him to do something when the two leaders meet at this week’s Group of 20 summit in Germany, Bloomberg’s Ting Shi reports. Kim’s successful test of an intercontinental ballistic missile Tuesday changes little for Xi, even if it’s raising alarm bells in the U.S.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...ck-in-trump-s-court-on-talks-with-north-korea

 

[rbkwp]

in the last year apart from the SMH/Australian media, trying several ways to get people to pay for news thats freely avaiable elsewhere,they often comes up with strange shit like this now

used to be a good source of mews like the BBC
both seem to have deterioted heaps now,both of them
editors or ..
admittedly theyre only reporting politician RUDDS mention,but
theyre almost suggesting a USA THAD defense system like SK now huh

'Why Australia should have a missile defence system for North Korea'
Australia needs to consider deploying a missile defence system to defend against attack from nuclear-armed North Korea, according to former prime minister Kevin Rudd.

 

[rbkwp]

yes you c... who already have nuclear are going to threaten everyone else and refuse to allow others to get anywhere close to having such

Treaty banning nuclear weapons adopted at UN

Peace campaigners hailed a global treaty to ban nuclear weapons under international law as a landmark moment.

But it's only symbolic - with none of the nuclear powers expected to sign the document when it's finally presented in September.

said it before dont believe CHINA has any obligation to appease the west by exerting its possible influence on NK, who willl likely always do what it wants, China or not
bought it on yourself TRUMP and you will be the first to do a bitch and moan no matter what China does, whatever you do you will be looking for/expecting the US citzens to be right behind you?
so dont try and use China/Russia as your excuse

North Korean missile launch pits China and Russia against the US

Two against one: China, Russia at odds with US over North Korea
For US President Donald Trump, there are no good options when it comes to dealing with North Korea, but Russia and China appear to be trying to extract a win by reducing US influence in the region, writes Ben Knight.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-...ia/8683034?WT.mc_id=newsmail&WT.tsrc=Newsmail

PHOTO: North Korea conducts its "largest-ever" live-fire drill of self-propelled artillery guns demonstrating their fire power at an event on the east coast this year. (Yonhap News Agency)

https://zippy.gfycat.com/BackUncommonBlackfish.webm

 

[sizehungry]

I don,t really care who , or by what means , that this half assed reptile bastard is " taken out " . Sooner rather than later i would suggest . Could not care less , if it is Trump + co , China , a clone of Adolf fucking Hitler , his mate Stalin , Theresa May , or the Man in the Moon , just as long as someone punches his ticket . My reason is simple , i fucking despise thugs , bullies and stand over men , in whatever form they appear , be they armed with rockets , ships , aircraft , small arms , knives , knuckle dusters , legislative power , a domineering intellect , or a computer keyboard etc . May they all burn in hell . I will close with a question ; why not a coalition made up of Chinese , Russian , Japanese , American , British , French , German , Italian , Canadian , Australian , New Zealand , Indian , South Korean , Pakistani , contingents from the Arabic states , and smaller nations of Europe and Africa .? Close down all trade , then send a naval contingent from each of the above , in his direction . Perhaps he might shit himself to death , upon the realization that such a force could utterly destroy his bullshit tinpot regime in a matter of moments . Never happen of course , but if it were up to me . Just thinking out loud , ..tired of living with a gun to my head .

 

[Dport]

Our one world economy won't allow for a ww3.

It's in China's best interest that the American economy be robust as fuck. And vice versa. (The reasons are obvious and simple).

Russia can't afford another cold war. They only care about the appearance of having a swinging cock. It's good for their national self esteem, so to speak, to stand up to the bastard yanks. But they have no interest in meeting us in the parking lot after last call.

If you legitimately fear a ww3, you're legitimately stoopid, yo.

 

[MikesJohnson]

As for North Korea, we pretty much have to defer to South Korea as they are the ones who will pay the heaviest price in the event of an all-out war. Now, if North Korea attacked the U.S., things would change. Of course, they're not going to do such a thing.

As for containing and deterring North Korea, I believe South Korea and Japan should inform China that unless China disarms the North's nuclear capability, they will both renounce the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and build their own nuclear arsenals. After all, it was the Chinese that permitted the north to go nuclear in the first place. I guarantee China does NOT want South Korea nor Japan developing a nuclear weapons ability. If I'm South Korea or Japan, I would NOT rely on an American administration to protect them. With a nuclear weapons capability, South Korea and Japan can put pressure on China to contain North Korea and could legitimately threaten to vaporize Beijing in the event North Korea annihilates Seoul, Tokyo, etc.

 

[Klingsor]

If you legitimately fear a ww3, you're legitimately stoopid, yo.

Fortunately, we've already had the War to End All Wars. Back in 1914.

 

[Industrialsize]

As for North Korea, we pretty much have to defer to South Korea as they are the ones who will pay the heaviest price in the event of an all-out war. Now, if North Korea attacked the U.S., things would change. Of course, they're not going to do such a thing.

As for containing and deterring North Korea, I believe South Korea and Japan should inform China that unless China disarms the North's nuclear capability, they will both renounce the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and build their own nuclear arsenals. After all, it was the Chinese that permitted the north to go nuclear in the first place. I guarantee China does NOT want South Korea nor Japan developing a nuclear weapons ability. If I'm South Korea or Japan, I would NOT rely on an American administration to protect them. With a nuclear weapons capability, South Korea and Japan can put pressure on China to contain North Korea and could legitimately threaten to vaporize Beijing in the event North Korea annihilates Seoul, Tokyo, etc.