Mods, please merge, delete, or close this ridiculously redundant, stupidly presented, perhaps deliberately inflammatory thread, especially as the OP has already been banned.
What is the question?Redundant maybe, stupidly presented? How? How is asking a simple yes or no question deliberately inflammatory? Or is asking a simple yes or no question about infant circumcision inherently inflammatory? Because if so that's no reflection on the question, and has more to do with some members not being able to discuss this subject matter civilly.
Which thread do you suggest it be merged to? Deleting it or closing it seems peremptory considering it hasn't as yet caused any trouble. There are plenty of active threads started by banned members.
What is the question?
"Infant circumcision. Yes/No What do you think?"
I'm not even sure what the OP is asking. Does it mean how do you feel about RIC? Should it be performed? Do you approve/disapprove? Do you advise/advocate for/against it? What?
It's so vague, unfocused and openended, I think it could be merged with virtually any of the circumcision threads and blend right into the background of the usual "discussions".
Sorry if I overreacted. But this one just seemed to go right to the most emotional heart of the controversy. Plus being so vague, it just seems to be inviting reactions. Probably it wasn't deliberately intended to be inflammatory, but if you wanted to stir it up, this would be a good way to go. It's not like the pros and cons of infant circumcision haven't been discussed ad nauseum, and will continue to be discussed, with the same ground gone over again and again and again. Regardless of the stated intent of a circumcision thread, it almost always seems to wind up in a shitfest over RIC
Can you tell us why the OP was already banned? Do you think it would be a good idea to have a separate Circumcision forum? I don't know for sure, but it seems like that might cut down on some of the redundancy. Maybe if people had questions or curiosity about the subject and saw it in the list of forums, they would be drawn there first for information, rather than posting a new thread with a random question that's already been answered thousands of times over by hundreds of posters.
mah 2 ct.
No argument here. Lately it seems more and more.I never said it was a good question, plenty of stupid questions are asked all over these boards all the time.
Completely agree. Though a well-focused question that's not covering the same rough territory might have better success.Again though if circ threads often devolve into slanging matches that's not really the fault of the questions asked in their OPs it's more to do with the behaviour and attitudes of those who post in them.
And this would be a problem? :wink:Besides if we closed down every thread that might cause a shit storm massive chunks of the forums would disappear.
Well, as I said, I overreacted. I'm not advocating for closure anymore. Though I think merging obviously redundant threads is generally a good idea. If this one started to take off maybe, which it so far hasn't.As for duplicate threads, well I have my own personal view on them, but I understand the logic of allowing them to an extent, so I don't see any reason to close this one yet on that basis.
I think it's a good idea, and I hope you all will consider it. It's clearly a topic a lot of members are interested in and have strong feelings about. It's a fundamental penis appearance/identity issue that most men think seriously about at some point, and some men think about quite a lot. Housing it in its own forum I think would be a terrific easy to access educational resource, might cut down on some of the redundancy and random new threads, and who knows, might even reduce some of the vitriol. One can only hope.Erm yeah I suppose a circumcision forum might be a good idea.
:banghead2:i think good lord NO, not this again!!!!! aaaarrrrggghhhhhh!!!!!:aargh4:
No, absolutely not, it is NOT to be a perental decision! IT IS A PERSONAL DECISION, no less. Personal pertaining to the person, the person at hand here is THE CHILD, and it is only the child, and only in good mental health who is to chose.There should be a "maybe" in the poll. At the end of the day, it is a parental decision, and some guys might wish to gauge their wife's opinion before making a decision.
Perhaps a better question would be:
Would you fight to ensure your son is not circumcised at birth ?
aka: is your opposition to circumcision such that you would go against your wife's desires and force her to accept your principles ?
There should be a "maybe" in the poll. At the end of the day, it is a parental decision, and some guys might wish to gauge their wife's opinion before making a decision.
Perhaps a better question would be:
Would you fight to ensure your son is not circumcised at birth ?
aka: is your opposition to circumcision such that you would go against your wife's desires and force her to accept your principles ?
Erm yeah I suppose a circumcision forum might be a good idea.