Insecure Obama taking shots at radio host

MovingForward

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Posts
842
Media
0
Likes
124
Points
173
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Rush say's he hope Obama fails.

We have 2 wars, our economy is down. Why would you wish any president to fail, oh I forgot because you have 400 million contract and that reaffirms how patriotic you are.
 

rawbone8

Cherished Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2004
Posts
2,827
Media
1
Likes
295
Points
303
Location
Ontario (Canada)
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
The FOX headline is a misquote, to begin with. And the misquote is repeated in the subheading and the lead sentence.

According to the unattributed witness in the "news" story, Obama didn't say "Stop listening to..."

He said "You can't just listen to..."


There's a big difference in meaning between the two statements. Yet starinvestor goes for the FOX mis-interpretation hook, line and sinker. No surprise there, son.
 
Last edited:

B_Nick8

Cherished Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Posts
11,402
Media
0
Likes
305
Points
208
Location
New York City, by way of Marblehead, Boston and Ge
Sexuality
80% Gay, 20% Straight
Gender
Male
There's a difference between 'listening' and agreeing in the sense of polarizing, star. Now is not the time for partisan politics that impede progress in the resolution of the problems that face this country. Limbaugh has never been good for anything but a dead-end game.
 

cameltoelover

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2006
Posts
363
Media
15
Likes
109
Points
263
Location
Minneapolis
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
The only thing interesting about Rush Limbough is his reputed homosexuality. He's just another ultra-right wing closet case. If the rumors weren't true wouldn't he sue for libel or slander?
 

B_starinvestor

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2006
Posts
4,383
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
183
Location
Midwest
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
There's a difference between 'listening' and agreeing in the sense of polarizing, star. Now is not the time for partisan politics that impede progress in the resolution of the problems that face this country. Limbaugh has never been good for anything but a dead-end game.

Limbaugh has admitted himself that he is an entertainer and not a journalist. Does Obama, or any Dem or lib for that matter, think that Republican politicians form their voting agenda by tuning in to Rush?

The Repub lawmakers are tuning in to their constituents right now; not Rushy.

He's maybe a step away from Howard Stern; and their contracts are similar. I'm surprised The Chosen One would stoop to even acknowledging Limbaugh.

Even Jr. didn't acknowledge Maher, Olbermann and Co.
 

D_Ireonsyd_Colonrinse

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2007
Posts
1,511
Media
0
Likes
7
Points
123
star:

You didn't even acknowledge the fact that you monkeyed around with actual quotes.

"You can't just listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done" is what Obama said to GOP leaders in a fairly off-the-cuff, non-scripted remark.

Of course, this sounds fairly tame. There's not much there there.... And you, being the hyper-partisan that you are, and wishing to beef up the partisan quotient chose to... what?... spice up the sentence a bit and give us a rabble-rousing headline:

----------

Insecure Obama taking shots at radio host

'stop watching Limbaugh if you want to get things done'

----------


Nowhere does it indicate to me that Obama is "insecure". You pulled that out of your ass in order to create a more sensationalized post. If we go back through the many, many months of anti-Obama threads (and comments) you yourself have posted... what does this constant drip-drip-drip of Obama-bashing indicate about your own "security"?


Of course, Limbaugh is now forever quoting Obama's remarks on his own show, like it's all about him, working it, milking this publicity for everything it's worth, pretending like he's the center of political gravity (Limbaugh: "He is hoping that these Republicans will also publicly denounce me and thus marginalize me... If I can be made to serve as a distraction, then there is that much less time debating the merits of the trillion dollar debacle." --- oh, yeah, right, Rush. -- Obama was looking to use a has-been radio host as a distraction to deflect criticism for his stimulus package)
 
Last edited:

tripod

Legendary Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Posts
6,695
Media
14
Likes
1,929
Points
333
Location
USA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Limbaugh has admitted himself that he is an entertainer and not a journalist.

Thank God he is now telling the truth.

Does Obama, or any Dem or lib for that matter, think that Republican politicians form their voting agenda by tuning in to Rush?

Actually, yes. Rush has propagated right wing propaganda for years that has twisted the brains of his listeners soooo damn much that they don't really know right from wrong anymore. If you are told that 9+9=25, then you will be useless when you are faced with a quadratic equation. That is how Rush has worked on his listeners... their thinking is so fucking backwards that they cannot come up with the proper solutions to our problems anymore.

Even Jr. didn't acknowledge Maher, Olbermann and Co.

Maher does not disseminate lies disguised as truths. Olbermann does not take kindly to bullshit and has made a hell of a career exposing the douchebags in Washington for what they are. Maddow is the same.

None of them tell lies.

Limbaugh makes a living lying to his listeners and presenting them with half truths and disinformation.

A lie is a lie and Rush has been caught lying NUMEROUS times...

Maher, Maddow and yes Olbermann have NEVER been caught lying to the people.

Rush is a problem for America and his listeners are some truly xenophobic, racist, authoritarian and dangerous people.

Hannity and Glen Beck are just as guilty but have not wreaked the kind of havoc on rational thought that Rush has over the years.
 

ZOS23xy

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2007
Posts
4,906
Media
3
Likes
31
Points
258
Location
directly above the center of the earth
There's a book out called FLUSH RUSH and it picks off the big one's misquotes, errors and plain fantasizing.


It's one of a number of book on the Fat Moron.

I don't think Rush is gay, but has hinted on air of his use of viagra and 'easy women' when he visits some tropical island on his vacations.

If he's gay, then he is a hypocrite. If he is a die hard Republican, he's a hypocrite (how many marriages? Wasn't one of them done while he was pilled out? Why don't these women come forth and tell their sides?)....

Rush does complain to be an entertainer, but that's a lie too. He takes his role in politics very seriously.
 

tripod

Legendary Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Posts
6,695
Media
14
Likes
1,929
Points
333
Location
USA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Rush does complain to be an entertainer, but that's a lie too. He takes his role in politics very seriously.

I highly agree and he is most likely an unwitting accomplice in an elaborate psychological operation

Something also tells me that if one of his wives came forward, they would wind up with some really bad luck and might even end up a corpse. Exposing a PSYOPS operation usually carries a pretty large penalty one might say...
 

devron

1st Like
Joined
Nov 6, 2008
Posts
123
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
103
Location
Wes-Vahginia
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
All of them make a living telling certain segments of the population what they want to hear. Olbermann doesn't lie outright, but he does equivocate (as pundits are want to do) which isn't far off. He and the others speak their opinion, which is fine and perfectly within their right, but no one should be getting all their information from these people.
 

tripod

Legendary Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Posts
6,695
Media
14
Likes
1,929
Points
333
Location
USA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Olbermann doesn't lie outright, but he does equivocate (as pundits are want to do)

To equivocate means that there is a desire to mislead and Olbermann is a straight shooter with no desire to mislead anyone. I would hardly characterize Keith Olbermann as "beating around the bush"... he is as direct as you can get on TV.
 

B_starinvestor

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2006
Posts
4,383
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
183
Location
Midwest
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
To equivocate means that there is a desire to mislead and Olbermann is a straight shooter with no desire to mislead anyone. I would hardly characterize Keith Olbermann as "beating around the bush"... he is as direct as you can get on TV.

Yet he is extremely partisan. He hops on one side of an issue and stays there vehemently; making animated faces and voice inflections.

He's not much higher on his delivery of information than Rushy.
 

devron

1st Like
Joined
Nov 6, 2008
Posts
123
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
103
Location
Wes-Vahginia
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
To equivocate means that there is a desire to mislead and Olbermann is a straight shooter with no desire to mislead anyone. I would hardly characterize Keith Olbermann as "beating around the bush"... he is as direct as you can get on TV.

I know what equivocate means. How do you know what his intentions are? He talks straight as he sees it, which is fine, but he does not present both sides of all the issues. He's also very smart, so I don't believe for a minute he doesn't *know* there are two or more sides to every story. So either I overestimate him and he really isn't fully informed or he is choosing not to paint the full picture for whatever reason.

I don't have a problem with people watching him. I watch him. He's funny and sometimes finds topics I haven't heard about. The only problem I have is with folks who watch only primetime MSNBC and think they're informed citizens who then, ironically, set about on the internets mocking folks who just watch Foxnews.
 

tripod

Legendary Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Posts
6,695
Media
14
Likes
1,929
Points
333
Location
USA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Yet he is extremely partisan. He hops on one side of an issue and stays there vehemently; making animated faces and voice inflections.

He is extremely partisan, but this is in the context of one of the most charged partisan divides that this country has ever experienced since the civil war.

The Republicans are usually wrong and siding with "Big money" is never going to get this country anywhere but bankruptcy. The Republicans have run this country into the ground with their deregulation and laisse fare economic policies. It's too bad that the incredibly successful Republican president from Arkansas was into similar economic policies, because now we are fucked.

I for one, was sick and tired from the news agencies expounding the "company line" of the Bush administration and was fucking RELIEVED when Olbermann went on the air. Finally there was one fucking television bubble head that chose to tell the truth and be the voice of the people.

The only people that believed in Bush during his second term were the die-hard right wingers who will never see the light no matter what.

The rest of the country was sick of his administration's bullshit and authoritarian practices. Keith is a hit because he tells the truth and MSNBC has bucked up to become an effective counterbalance against FOXNEWS's right wing propaganda.

I am sure that deep down inside that you are onboard with the new era that we are embarking on, but just won't ever admit it in public. lol!!!

I've still got plenty of faith in you despite your apparent distrust of Obama, who hasn't been a proven liar by any means. :smile:
 

faceking

Cherished Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2004
Posts
7,426
Media
6
Likes
282
Points
208
Location
Mavs, NOR * CAL
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Anytime someone says "Stop listening to ______," it tends to make me extremely nervous.


I agree... but I haven't even bothered with this thread, as I knew it was about Rush Limbaugh, who's a fucking blowhard. For Obama to even name drop him is quite bush league. Whatever... unless it's some prelude to start down the slippery slope of that god awful "Fairness Doctrine". I don't think so, I want to give ol Barrah a bit more credit than that.