Sorcerer said:I spent 5 years with a hot looking guy who could mentally wrestle me to the mat on just about any occasion. As much of a turn-on as it was to be with someone with big brains, he had a gift for seeking my weak spots and exploiting them in front of others. After it was over with him, I prayed for a gorgeous, stupid stud and found one. What a fucking bore. The worst part was his proclivity for discussing things of which he had absolutely no knowledge. It was truly embarrassing. When this happened, I did my best to focus on his sizzling looks, great body and big dick. Believe me, the latter wore thin quickly. I longed to have an intelligent conversation with my BF but learned that would require a new one. It's not easy for me to find them, I tend to scare the shit out of men. I started speaking to guy number 1 again and a funny thing happened...I discovered they key to keeping up with him wasn't a shortcoming of my own intelligence but a lack of self-confidence. After proving to him (and mostly to myself) that I had the goods to pin his big brain to the mat, I threw his number out. My BF now is the total package, he's handsome, intelligent and has enough dick to make any whore happy. The best part about him is his humility.
For me the moral of the story was this: looks alone are a bore and wear thin quickly and misused intelligence can cause a great deal of damage.
Sorcerer said:For me the moral of the story was this: looks alone are a bore and wear thin quickly and misused intelligence can cause a great deal of damage.
Hey, if they're stupid and look hot, I have no problem making 'em eat the pillow.DWTS00 said:Thats why you leave em and start fucking someone else, again and again and again and again....:biggrin1:
EnglishGentleman said:True physical beauty requires nothing more than soap, water and a comb. How much work is that?
___________________________
That's true.
Give Donald Trump a bath and a big comb over
and ain't he pretty!
Webster said:EnglishGentleman said:True physical beauty requires nothing more than soap, water and a comb. How much work is that?
___________________________
That's true.
Give Donald Trump a bath and a big comb over
and ain't he pretty!
I'm from L.A. where we have plenty of manmade beauty:wink:
Sorcerer said:________________________Webster said:I'm from L.A. where we have plenty of manmade beauty:wink:
Excepting you,
,,,,,,and ATTTTitude up the ying yang.
Webster said:Did YOU just call me a stuck up queen?Sorcerer said:________________________
Excepting you,
,,,,,,and ATTTTitude up the ying yang.
All my body parts are real.
LittleKitten said:Ok, I will try and explain it more clearly for you......
Anyway, I’ve just showered and as this thread is getting pretty inbred and ugly I’m off to bed…. nite everyone.
EnglishGentleman said:Until you posted the above, I was beginning to admire your courage and determination in this debate, but then you let yourself down by attempting to be patronising and glib.I can't really say it any better than you have here sweetie... but if you want to box above your weight you are going to need bigger gloves... :tongue:
LK
x
p.s. I'm flattered you've taken the trouble to read something before making this post though... it's an improvement over your "beautiful dead nudes" theory, or was that an hypothesis? I never can remember... :smile:
EnglishGentleman said:LK I've not the time for such triviality. You clearly can't support your point so you descend to petty schoolyard jibes. What a waste of your potential.
LittleKitten said:Say… are you flirting with me? lol :smile:
It isn’t really helpful to define the concept of beauty as “something exceptionally attractive”… well you can, but it’s a subjective tautology. You might as well say, in describing an egg, that it’s “very egg-shaped.” The objective definition (Langlois and Roggmann) is that it is a composite of averages. It might be you are defining "average" subjectively too, sorry.
So, anyway, once again… mating from a small genetic group (inbreeding) ultimately produces asymmetrical features, mental disorders and infertility. These offspring do not tend to survive.Mating from a large genetic group produces average features and healthy offspring. These do tend to survive. :smile: I think it’s called “survival of the fittest.”
Eventually the dominance of the successful genes (represented by those individuals with average features) produced “homogenisation” of a wide gene pool, later classed as broad types: Caucasian, Negroid, etc., but within which there are many minor sub-divisions. Each have their own definition of beauty, but broadly speaking each definition is still an average of genetic features for that group. As a species we haven’t evolved for a long time because any minor mutations haven’t found sufficient advantage to outnumber the dominant gene pool. Do you see? It’s quite simple really.
As Langlois and Roggmann illustrated, the more average the features, the more attractive the individual becomes. Beauty is not just skin deep, it’s about good genes, in other words: our concept of beauty has evolved from a system for regulating genetic pairing. This is why we are all mysteriously drawn to mate with what we perceive as "beautiful". It's actually quite profound.
Sorry I haven’t written as much as you, but I think I answered all your points? If you want to go another round I’ll put my gloves on… :tongue:
LK
xox
I want to fuck you stupid.LittleKitten said:As for myself, guys don't mind me being pretty, but most would prefer me to be less smart...:tongue:
EnglishGentleman said:Thanks for your apology in another thread. I appreciate it. Let's continue this discussion in an academic fashion. Ok?
Spladle said:I want to fuck you stupid.