Intelligence VS Beauty

LittleKitten

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2005
Posts
119
Media
2
Likes
8
Points
163
Location
Bristol/Bath, United Kingdom
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Female
madame_zora said:
LittleKitten, I think I have figured out where my problem is. What you're saying is that the things we consider to qualify a face as "beautiful" is a "blended look", but that the number of persons who have that look might be fewer. is that right?

Yes Madame Zora, you completely have it! Looking at the blended faces really helped me to grasp what Langlois and Roggman were suggesting. And yes, a perfectly averaged face is very rare. The suggestion is that it represents an ideal (exceptionally blended) genetic target for mating. I am not sure it is so important these days, as we are no longer tribal and have spread so far and wide as a species, but the emphasis on finding a mate with healthy genes still seems to be strongly with us. :smile:

LK
 

madame_zora

Sexy Member
Joined
May 5, 2004
Posts
9,608
Media
0
Likes
52
Points
258
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Wow, that was unnecessarily confusing for me! Haha, been out of school too long. The word "average" threw me off, but I get what they're saying now.

Frankly, I miss the days when healthy was considered beautiful, not that I ever lived in them. I remember reading something to that affect once when Bettie Page was being discussed, that was supposedly her appeal. I've always found the waif look somewhat repulsive for that very reason. Of course this doesn't fit well with my love for skinny guys, does it? :biggrin1:
 

B_RoysToy

Cherished Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Posts
7,115
Media
0
Likes
291
Points
283
Age
34
Location
memphis, tennessee
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
HickBoy said:
Ah, attractiveness is overdetermined. I have known some exceptionally beautiful and intelligent women who were the most difficult people I've met. The combination of beauty, brains, loving, caring, self-aware, mindful, kind, and good in bed doesn't exist, in my experience. God knows I've looked hard for years.

With your negative experience, you make me appreciate my ex even more, HickBoy. At 24 I married a 19 year old beauty queen with a near genius IQ, who was the kindest, sweetest, most understanding, out-going and talented person I've ever known. After 29 years and three wonderful kids, I caused her to get rid of me. They are out there and I urge you to keep looking!
 

Shelby

Experimental Member
Joined
May 17, 2004
Posts
2,129
Media
0
Likes
15
Points
258
Location
in the internet
RoysToy said:
With your negative experience, you make me appreciate my ex even more, HickBoy. At 24 I married a 19 year old beauty queen with a near genius IQ, who was the kindest, sweetest, most understanding, out-going and talented person I've ever known. After 29 years and three wonderful kids, I caused her to get rid of me. They are out there and I urge you to keep looking!

Sorry to hear about your split. But 29 years is a pretty good run.

A trip to Platinum Plus might help. Probably the most fun Gentlemen's club with the prettiest girls I've ever been to.
 

jaybee

1st Like
Joined
Sep 27, 2006
Posts
6
Media
2
Likes
1
Points
146
Location
Glasgow
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
Chuck64 said:
The ability to create art, music, or great literary and philosophical works adds cultural value to society. A new invention can save lives and a great piece of computer software can make life just a little more bearable. That's why "intelligence" is more important to the human race. It makes our existence better.

what you say there reminds me of the difference between jeramy bethams definition of utilitarianism contrasted with john stewart mills. Benthams was much more of a 'hedonistic' idea of utility, that society should seek to maximise the more if you like base pleasures i guess hehe wine, women and song, wheras mill seemed to value more 'intellectual' pleasures as being worthy of pursuit. I often wondered what an intellectual pleasure was when i first came accross it, i mean is it like once one deciphers a particularly difficult passage of hegel do they get a kinda pervy smile happening and think to oneself, mmmmmmmm just had an intellectual pleasure there lol.

anyhow getting more relavent with what you say above, id say that it all comes down to what is worthy of pursuit, ie beauty seems to apply more to that benthian description of utility whereas ur definition of value seems to accord with mills. So from a benthian perspective, you would be wrong, beuty is where it is at, but from a mill perspective youve got it sussed. I swing around both depending on my mood :)
 

jaybee

1st Like
Joined
Sep 27, 2006
Posts
6
Media
2
Likes
1
Points
146
Location
Glasgow
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
intresting debate between EG and K, I'd definately like to hear EGs counter argument, how old is this thread.

I know nothing about this issue really so i'll leave it to you two experts on it. I do get the feeling that the definition of human beauty does seem to have a class element to an extent. Certainly seems to be so when it comes to weight. Although that said, im just repeating a trite oft repeated thing, maybe one day i'll have the time and inclination to look into this issue more in depth.

Have either of you read 'the beauty myth'? What are your views on this?