Speaking of celestial evidence there seems to be a lot or not. The list is long but its not something taught in schools or expressed in our media.
This isn't intended to prove or disprove but merely to show a few examples. One thing is clear no one is going to resolve these. You would go down in history. Well maybe the 1st example.
This is kind of lighthearted but serious at the same moment. It wasn't reported in the west or the east. But its on the net.
The russians had one their orbits years ago. One of the cosmonauts reported an orange cloud approaching them. This orange cloud was also tracked by nasa. When the orbit entered the cloud the cosmonauts reported the presence of 10 giant celestial beings matching the descriptions of angels.
The russians are not known for their sense of humor.
Scientists , since their credibility is at stake , are not known for their sense of humor.
The russian space agency { see above }.
The cosmonauts { see above }.
As far as i know , and i don't know that much about it , no one from russia has ever refuted this claim.
It totally out of character in all respects.
Example 2 - The Appearance of the Virgn Mary in Guadalupe Mexico in 1531
More serious and mysterious. Brieftly somewhat.
The church until the 20th century had approved only one general miracle. That place in france. After a 450 year investigation or so it approved the guadalupe apparition.
Juan Diego { who some scientists doubt ever lived } encountered the Virgin Mary who asked him to deliver some roses to the bishop of mexico. When he did an image instantly appeared on the cloth the roses were wrapped in. A very complex image of the Virgin Mary.
That image has become one of the mostly studied objects in history. An army of scientists from MIT { i believe did a recent study } , cal tech , xerox , bell etc etc.has studied the cloth for over 400 years.
The image of the Virgin Mary is on tilma which is "ayata fiber " which i've read usually decomposes in either weeks or years. Its been almost 500 years. The image has remained in pristine condition despite floods , a bombing, smoke and acid. The embellishments have cracked and faded.
" As early as the 18th century scientists showed it was impossible to paint such an image in a fabric of that nature " Tripod/Mary
A sample of the image was given to the nobel prize winner in physics in the 1920s who said he didn't know what it was but it wasn't paint. Then a sample was given to richard kuhn who had won the nobel prize in chemistry who stated the image did not have natural animal , or mineral coloring.
Later in 1979 ibm scientist phillp calllahan and jody smith using digital enchancement and iinfrared rays looked for any evidence the image was done by human hands. They concluded the image could not have been done by human hands.
But before that ophthalmologists had began studying the eyes in the image after it was reported that tiny figures existed within the eyes. In 1956 Dr.Javier Buneo certified the presence of tiny figures in the eyes exactly where they would be in live eyes and showing the samson - purkinje effect { we see in curves / the eye is curved }.
Later engineer jose tonsmann magnified the tiny figures through mathematical and optical procedures in a digital process using satellites and space probes. The figures seem to represent the moment the veil was unclothed.
Others reports , which i have heard off but never read have , identified micro arteries circulating in the free edge of the eyelids. I guess live arteries not paintings. Of course impossible.
But believe it or not that is brief when compared to the hundreds if not thousands of studies. Who doesn't like a good mystery. Tripod/Mary but there are hundreds of articles on this apparition. The image , i think , has beoome the national image of mexico.
