I just found out that attempts to solve the problem of detecting sarcasm or irony in text goes all the way back to the 1580s! This page describes various proposed punctuation marks such as:
the percontation point, which was used until the 17th century for rhetorical questions
the interrobang, which was used for rhetorical questions intended to express disbelief or excitement
the irony mark, used to indicate that the sentence was to be understood on a secondary level, such as ironically or sarcastically
Temherte slaqî, the Ethiopian punctuation to indicate sarcasm
and other typography for addressing these situations such as psuedo-HTML <sarcasm></sarcasm> marks or hashtags like #sarcasm
Don't you think communicating in text would be a lot easier and cause less confusion if we had more punctuation marks to indicate how you intended your words to be interpreted?
the percontation point, which was used until the 17th century for rhetorical questions
the interrobang, which was used for rhetorical questions intended to express disbelief or excitement
the irony mark, used to indicate that the sentence was to be understood on a secondary level, such as ironically or sarcastically
Temherte slaqî, the Ethiopian punctuation to indicate sarcasm
and other typography for addressing these situations such as psuedo-HTML <sarcasm></sarcasm> marks or hashtags like #sarcasm
Don't you think communicating in text would be a lot easier and cause less confusion if we had more punctuation marks to indicate how you intended your words to be interpreted?
Last edited: