midlifebear
Expert Member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2007
- Posts
- 5,789
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 179
- Points
- 133
- Location
- Nevada, Buenos Aires, and Barçelona
- Sexuality
- 60% Gay, 40% Straight
- Gender
- Male
I foisted a writing exercise on all of my students (college age and adult) to write a simple paragraph without using any form of the verb to be. This includes is, am were, was, will be, has been, etc. Writers and language instructors call this form of writing "E-Prime." You can easily write about the human -- or any other state or condition -- without ever using a form of to be. Don't believe me? Try it. The grammatical rules of English never insist that any form of to be as necessary.
John is the boy I like who is taking me to the prom. [weak]
I like John. He will take me to the prom. [strong]
I liked foisting this writing exercises upon my students because if often made them cry. But once they got the hang of it they improved their writing 1000%.
By the way, there are many famous authors who write strictly in E-Prime and, if you read their works, you've probably never even noticed. But you may have noticed how well they write.
So, I vote we get rid of to be and all of its forms.
John is the boy I like who is taking me to the prom. [weak]
I like John. He will take me to the prom. [strong]
I liked foisting this writing exercises upon my students because if often made them cry. But once they got the hang of it they improved their writing 1000%.
By the way, there are many famous authors who write strictly in E-Prime and, if you read their works, you've probably never even noticed. But you may have noticed how well they write.
So, I vote we get rid of to be and all of its forms.