Is Average Small?

How do you feel about the average size of 5.1 inches?

  • Too big

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Perfect, just right

    Votes: 77 29.3%
  • Somewhat smaller than I prefer

    Votes: 119 45.2%
  • Irrelevant

    Votes: 64 24.3%
  • Other

    Votes: 3 1.1%

  • Total voters
    263

ShortsGuy321

Loved Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
May 19, 2019
Posts
212
Media
2
Likes
558
Points
198
Location
Auckland (New Zealand)
Verification
View
Gender
Male
Average is average man.

I’m about 6.5 hard and I’m small in comparison to some men, but I’m apparently in the 95th or so percentile.

Honestly, I thought I was small for the biggest time until I measured properly and looked at the stats. Porn definitely ruins men’s perceptions of their own bodies which is why I think it’s unhealthy.

In a partner, so long as it’s not tiny (like 2 inches or anything) it’s fine. Big dicks are worse I think, you can’t do anything with them and they are just there.
 

Brian S

Worshipped Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2015
Posts
1,803
Media
5
Likes
12,242
Points
333
Age
44
Location
Nebraska (United States)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I kind of have to agree; the bigger they are, the harder they are to manage or do anything with. That's about the only comment I would make on size, because otherwise it truly doesn't matter to me. Variety is the spice of life, as far as I'm concerned. Plus, I decide on whether I want to fuck around with a guy long before I ever see his penis.
 

fournineteenfiftynine

Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Posts
1,470
Media
10
Likes
1,758
Points
593
Location
Minneapolis (Minnesota, United States)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I didn't vote. I perceive it as small, but absolutely not smaller than I prefer. I don't really have a preferred size. Average is certainly within the range I enjoy.
Interesting though that you still consider average small.
 
2

2693391

Guest
I honestly don’t care about size of the person I’m with. If we’re talking micro I can see some problems, but that’s pretty rare. Within the average range it’s all good. Kind and funny personality (and good looking is a big plus, not gonna lie) is what will get my attention.

Interesting though that you still consider average small.

I also perceive the average to be on the smaller side. But it’s not that surprising considering the site we’re on. We are probably not the right demographic party to ask this question to, without getting skewed results.
 

seventiesdemon

Superior Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
May 25, 2019
Posts
4,927
Media
7
Likes
5,609
Points
383
Location
Australia
Sexuality
69% Straight, 31% Gay
TX106a.jpg
Was going to go on with the joke about Nuns picking mushrooms...but it's older than I am...Posted here cause I was passing through.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gj816

blkcocktail

Loved Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2013
Posts
374
Media
2
Likes
639
Points
188
Location
Tennessee, USA
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
I think the idea of what’s average gets distorted once you’ve seen much bigger ones. It’s like fast-food restaurant’s drink cups, after you gotten the “big one”, the one that doesn’t even fit in your cup holder; a medium cup starts to look small, and a small cup just starts to seem pointless to even order.
 
D

deleted1138933

Guest
It depends on the sample you take. Average just represents the mean of the sample. It has nothing to do with real size. I I have said before, people are confusing statistical sizes (below average, average, above average) with real sizes (small, medium, large).

Average has nothing to do with real sizes

All average means is where majority of a range fall divided by the total number of the sample.

If for some reason 90% of men with 7”+ cocks would be eliminated (war, disease, or whatever) and sample measurements would be taken thereafter, the “average” size would significantly decrease. Does not mean a 3” dick is suddenly medium or large.

Likewise, if for some reason 90% of men with 6”- dicks would be eliminated (war, disease, or whatever) and sample measurements would be taken thereafter, the “average” size would significantly increase. Does not mean a 7” cock is suddenly medium or small.

So yes, the average is small, as MEDIUM is at about 6”.
 

Cum_is_Great

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Sep 25, 2006
Posts
5,281
Media
95
Likes
11,785
Points
493
Location
Connecticut (United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
It depends on the sample you take. Average just represents the mean of the sample. It has nothing to do with real size. I I have said before, people are confusing statistical sizes (below average, average, above average) with real sizes (small, medium, large).

Average has nothing to do with real sizes

All average means is where majority of a range fall divided by the total number of the sample.

If for some reason 90% of men with 7”+ cocks would be eliminated (war, disease, or whatever) and sample measurements would be taken thereafter, the “average” size would significantly decrease. Does not mean a 3” dick is suddenly medium or large.

Likewise, if for some reason 90% of men with 6”- dicks would be eliminated (war, disease, or whatever) and sample measurements would be taken thereafter, the “average” size would significantly increase. Does not mean a 7” cock is suddenly medium or small.

So yes, the average is small, as MEDIUM is at about 6”.
Its kinda astounding how wrong you are about math. If 90% of 7+ guys were eliminated, it wouldn't change much because the MASSIVE BULK of men are in average range.

Take a set of numbers

1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 the sum of which is 31

31÷14 = ~2.214

Eliminate one 3 and the four 4

1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 the sum of which is 24

24 ÷ 12 = 2

Not much of a change. Even when I removed almost 15% of the original stats to average out.

Now lets take the scale and DRASTICALLY upscale it to BILLIONS of men. The removal of less than 2% (The amount of men over 7+ inches) of around lets say 3 billion men would barely affect the average since there's still BILLIONS of men close to average.
 
D

deleted1138933

Guest
Its kinda astounding how wrong you are about math. If 90% of 7+ guys were eliminated, it wouldn't change much because the MASSIVE BULK of men are in average range.

Take a set of numbers

1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 the sum of which is 31

31÷14 = ~2.214

Eliminate one 3 and the four 4

1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 the sum of which is 24

24 ÷ 12 = 2

Not much of a change. Even when I removed almost 15% of the original stats to average out.

Now lets take the scale and DRASTICALLY upscale it to BILLIONS of men. The removal of less than 2% (The amount of men over 7+ inches) of around lets say 3 billion men would barely affect the average since there's still BILLIONS of men close to average.

Play with the numbers all you want, it does not change real size (small, medium, large). They would be average range, but regardless an 8” cock is not small no matter how you look at it. A 5” dick is not big no matter how you look at it. If you kill every man on earth who is 6” and over through war, disease or whatever, averages may or may not change. It will not make all the dicks on the end of the spectrum 5.5” - 5.9” suddenly huge. Sane goes if you eliminate all men under 7”. It will not make men at the end if the spectrum suddenly small.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chipp Douglas

Cum_is_Great

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Sep 25, 2006
Posts
5,281
Media
95
Likes
11,785
Points
493
Location
Connecticut (United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Play with the numbers all you want, it does not change real size (small, medium, large). They would be average range, but regardless an 8” cock is not small no matter how you look at it. A 5” dick is not big no matter how you look at it. If you kill every man on earth who is 6” and over through war, disease or whatever, averages may or may not change. It will not make all the dicks on the end of the spectrum 5.5” - 5.9” suddenly huge. Sane goes if you eliminate all men under 7”. It will not make men at the end if the spectrum suddenly small.
The only reason an 8 inch dick looks big is BECAUSE we don't normally have dicks that big ON AVERAGE. If you eliminated all dicks over 5 inches and had all men from today be 2 inches max, a 5 inch dick will be huge to humans. Did you know in comparison to primates we have huge penises at 5 inches? We dont think thats huge because its average for humans. You have to think outside of your already skewed perspective. Honestly it is not an easy thing for most people to do, but you currently are making arguments for outside normal statistics/perspectives referencing from inside normal statistics/perspectives.