He has, hasn't he?
@sargon
You really should rethink how you interpretate mr king - he used the example of "going to jail" to explain, that, even if you get judged as guilty you dont have to be guilty.
nice to hear that you care at least for somethingAs for PRISM I couldn't give a fuck about it. Sorry with polar ice caps melting, deforestation, habitat loss, the rampaging of the planet thanks to capitalism and greed all accelerating. I could care less what the NSA does.
and there you got it...If you want privacy go live like bin Laden did. It's the only guaranteed way.[/FONT]
Thats rather the irony, isnt it? The only places the US has left open for him to go to are Russia and China. He didnt defect, they forced him to go there.The word would be defection rather than quitting.
Now there we have an absolute and fundamental disagreement. A disagreement upheld by international law too, although i heard the US has refused to sign up to many international treaties on humane behaviour. For example, an example you may have heard of, many Germans were accused for war crimes or crimes against humanity simply because they obeyed lawful orders from their government. Virtually every human acknowledges that there comes a point where it is the duty of citizens to break unacceptable laws. Another example would be Mr King, who you mentioned.The law is the law and an oath is an oath.
I do have to agree that Perados has correctly explained Mr King's meaning, and you missed it. I agree we seem to share a belief in liberty and the duty of the individual to act to maintain that liberty, which you lack.You and Dandelion have an underpinning belief that prevents both from ever getting it.
The law is the law and an oath is an oath.
I do have to agree that Perados has correctly explained Mr King's meaning, and you missed it.
There's a presumption that everyone will obey the law, and making the decision to disobey it is likely to have serious consequences. But there are rare occasions when disobeying the law is the right thing to do. This case may or may not be an example of the latter.
It's a shame the USA hasn't found a solution. Allowing the guy to go to Venezuela might have been an answer. For that matter the USA might have asked an ally to give him a home. I think it would be far better for the USA and everyone if he were resident in the UK (say) than in Russia.
@sargon20
If your interpetation is right, what is about...
Einstein, heisenberg, oppenheimer, helen rubinstein, marlene dietrich or marx? They all left germany and worked against germany (before the war) - they are all traitors by your arguementation.
You are right about rubinstein and oppenheimer (somehow i always thought he was german)Not to be too much of a stickler, but does Oppenheimer belong on that list? He was an American, after all, and though he studied in Germany, he returned to the U.S. in 1927, half a dozen years before the Nazis came to power.
For that matter, Helena Rubinstein moved to the U.S. in 1914 (at the outbreak of a different war), and I'm not sure she ever lived in Germany.
Marx left Germany in 1843; not sure that was in response to any particular war.
@sargon20
If your interpetation is right, what is about...
Einstein, heisenberg, oppenheimer, helen rubinstein, marlene dietrich or marx? They all left germany and worked against germany (before the war) - they are all
traitors by your arguementation.
Same counts for ovid (left rome) - dalai lama (left tibet) - the polish exil goverment (they refused to return to poland past WW2, cause of soviet russia) - boris beresowsky (left russia) - leo tolstoi (left russia)
And if you think de gaul doesnt count cause of the war, you should rate snowden the same way - the usa is at war against terror![]()
Lol what an pathetic try not to answer... To bad, you cant acknowledge that you were wrong.What an insult to Einstein! Seriously? You want to compare Einstein to a thief and serial liar like Snowden?at: You keep marching off the deep end Parados. Your case just gets weaker and weaker.
they still would be traitors by your interpretation
- they all left their nation and avoided going to jail.
Wow! have you just looked up my file?Your animosity towards the US gov't is well known.
The Uk suffered two world wars where there was a true threat of annihilation of the country. Seems to me this justified measures just about as extreme as anyone could devise. Had I been alive then I would have wholeheartedly joined in with the intelligence war. Then, in my lifetime we had the Irish terrorism, a home grown and internal difficulty which was a considerably greater threat to actual citizens and was managed much more calmly than the nonsense we are experiencing now. A problem which incidentally was made more difficult because of American support for the 'insurgents'. A policy which the US has followed in many parts of the world, creating many of the problems it now faces.Therefore anyone like a Snowden or Manning is automatically your 'hero' n'est-ce pas? And discussing the law or oaths taken is frankly always "justified" if the end result is a humbled and embarrassed U.S. gov't.
Your best hope of winning the debate is that people who disagree with you will voluntarily stop making points you cannot counter by argument or evidence?You should recuse yourself from this discussion.
I see the article you quote makes similar points to yourself. I already mentioned that there is no legitimate means of whistleblowing so no reasonable person could follow one! The article accepts that Snowden may have been correct to whisleblow, it only disputes his methods. There is a fundamental disagreement between the two sides whether there is a functional means of complaint within the US.
In Athens, we would know. And then the nation would judge who was right. Whether Snowden or Bush/Obama should be executed. Socrates lost the argument so it was he who suffered the penalty. Applying this ancient method, presumably all members of congress would be executed who had supported these measures if the citizens found against them?we will never really know what he has compromised and given away and that the government will never let go unpunished.
I am sure the US has suffered much greater harm by its own incompetence than anything Snowden could do. For the most part all he has done is rub the administrations noses in evidence of what they had already been accused of doing. All he has done is prove they are doing what they are believed to be doing anyway.Some might say that Snowden's acts should be legal, but Fuzzy wonders what they have to say about his willful sabotage of the US by revealing secrets about US spying overseas.
Wow! have you just looked up my file?