Is it a turn-on . . .

erratic

Loved Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Posts
4,289
Media
0
Likes
508
Points
333
Sexuality
No Response
That alone is not sufficient grounds for being turned on, nor do I think it would add anything to an already-appealing encounter. That said, it wouldn't be a turn off for me, either.
 

hairynyc

Experimental Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Mar 21, 2011
Posts
146
Media
4
Likes
12
Points
263
Location
New York
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
It's not a turn on for me, but it's also not a turn off. I have to say, the couple of times I was with men who'd only been with women before, I didn't find that they needed any training. Their years of experience with women gave them just about all the prep they needed in pleasing me through touching and kissing. And their lifetime of experience playing with their own bits gave them plenty of ideas of how to make mine feel good. There may have been an occasional question, but I think a lot of gay guys could stand to make that kind of effort when with someone new.
 

D_T_Frothingill_Bellows

Account Disabled
Joined
Jul 19, 2007
Posts
593
Media
0
Likes
78
Points
173
This is such a general question, you'll never get a definitive answer. Some guys fantasize about it, some guys genuinely like it, some guys need it, some guys don't care, some guys would rather not, and some guys wouldn't if you paid them

Personally, yes, I, regretfully, am one of the many who fantasizes about the "straight" male, but I also had a FB who was bi and experimenting and while he was a cool dude and we're friends and have slept together a few times.... the sex was bleh