Is it legal? Swimsuit with a pouch?

D_Percy_Prettywillie

Account Disabled
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Posts
748
Media
0
Likes
22
Points
53
That... is silly. Yes, they're perfectly legal. So long as your penis isn't exposed (public indecency/indecent exposure) and it isn't like... a fetish costume? You're going to be just fine. Especially in California.

This isn't... you know, 1984 (the novel or the year.)



JSZ​
 

Daisy

Loved Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Posts
4,742
Media
0
Likes
553
Points
258
Location
California (United States)
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Female
I disagree. I live in CA. I know there are decency laws but you'd really have to look it up to be sure. If you mean a nude beach then youre ok, adult resort fine. Public pool where kids are..I think you'd have a problem.

We are liberal in parts of CA but not everywhere by any means..
 

D_Percy_Prettywillie

Account Disabled
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Posts
748
Media
0
Likes
22
Points
53
Seriously? Don't be stupid; you think there are parts of the country where they've outlawed swim suits with profile enhancing pouches? And that those parts of the country are in California?

Set aside the constitutionality of prohibited dress that isn't indecent and just consider how unlikely it is that any legislature would take time to ban something so specific. How would such a thing even be enforced? Cops come up and ask to see the pouch of a mans underwear to check for enhancement features? What if a dude wearing a speedo simply has a giant cock?


That's... a minute and a half of absurdity I'll never get back. Dude, use your best judgement. I can promise you, so long as you aren't exposing yourself, you're fine legally speaking. But prepare yourself for some looks if you head for a Holiday Inn where a bunch of little kids are swimming, undo your towel, and strut about in profile enhancing swim wear. On Californian beach? No one is going to give a single fuck.



JSZ​
 
D

deleted847535

Guest
I have a few of them, and not that I need the enhancing part I thought they wuld be more comfortable for my junk. I do fill them out and they d turn heads but they are a swim suit so they are legal.
Just be prepared for looks as they are more common on beaches than at hotel pools.
 

Trevor

Superior Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Posts
692
Media
15
Likes
2,637
Points
263
Location
Virginia (United States)
Sexuality
80% Gay, 20% Straight
Gender
Male
You are probably ok in California since people are somewhat more liberal than here in Pat Robertson country. In VA Beach wearing a thong is illegal. They outlawed them because they want to be a "family friendly" beach. If they haven't outlawed profile enhancing pouches it is only because they haven't thought of it. LOL

On a side note, thongs are legal at the military swim beach at the North end of VA Beach at Fort Story (since it is a Federal installation, VA Beach ordinances do not apply) but you need a CAC to get on base. Years ago when I was stationed there we were wrapping up a staff meeting one day at the Post HQ and and the Garrison Commander's cell phone rang. He answered it and said "Thanks for the heads up" He closed his flip phone and "said well boys this meeting is adjourned that was the lifeguard calling to tell me that two hot blondes in thongs just showed up at the beach. Anyone want to join me at the tiki bar for lunch? I am going up there to check them out." We all went and piled in a van and drove up there to the beach. LOL

You got any pics of you in this swimsuit you plan to wear?
 
Last edited:

Hoss

Loved Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2010
Posts
11,801
Media
2
Likes
586
Points
148
Age
73
Location
Eastern town
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
Seriously? Don't be stupid; you think there are parts of the country where they've outlawed swim suits with profile enhancing pouches? And that those parts of the country are in California?

Set aside the constitutionality of prohibited dress that isn't indecent and just consider how unlikely it is that any legislature would take time to ban something so specific. How would such a thing even be enforced? Cops come up and ask to see the pouch of a mans underwear to check for enhancement features? What if a dude wearing a speedo simply has a giant cock?


That's... a minute and a half of absurdity I'll never get back. Dude, use your best judgement. I can promise you, so long as you aren't exposing yourself, you're fine legally speaking. But prepare yourself for some looks if you head for a Holiday Inn where a bunch of little kids are swimming, undo your towel, and strut about in profile enhancing swim wear. On Californian beach? No one is going to give a single fuck.



JSZ​
California is a BIG state and there are probably places where local ordinances may have some sort of law about what is considered to be indecency. These laws are often free to a level of interpretation which means a thong or speedo or other item may be thought to be indecent and inappropriate.


Always best to find out what the local laws are before hand.


As to California and their 'liberal' card, take a look at what they did to gay rights regarding marriage with Proposition 8....voted on by the citizens.
 

D_Percy_Prettywillie

Account Disabled
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Posts
748
Media
0
Likes
22
Points
53
California is a BIG state and there are probably places where local ordinances may have some sort of law about what is considered to be indecency. These laws are often free to a level of interpretation which means a thong or speedo or other item may be thought to be indecent and inappropriate.


Always best to find out what the local laws are before hand.


As to California and their 'liberal' card, take a look at what they did to gay rights regarding marriage with Proposition 8....voted on by the citizens.


Let me see if I've got this straight;

You people are under the impression that a dude who has discretely (because there's no way to be indiscreet with the technology- it's either a sling or a pouch that causes lift, contained within a swim suit) enhanced his profile in swimwear is subject to legal action by the police should they opt to interpret or enforce laws that may or may not be on the books? What, in your minds, does this conversation sound like?


"Sir, we got a call from the Smiths about your penis appearing larger in your swim suit than is decent. We're gonna need you to come with us down town for questioning." ?

The OP didn't say his dong was gonna be hard or that he was going to doing jumping jacks on a trampoline while wet. He's talking about wearing something widely available at retail locations all over the US (a lot of them, like Andrew Christian, based where else but California) and you're saying it's best to check with the authorities first?


What the hell part of the country are you people from where you would even be remotely concerned about such a thing? Have you seen what people wear in Wal-Mart?

And either post your silly Penal Code or gtfo- I'm not sifting through the penal code to tell this poor guy the First Amendment doesn't apply to certain parts of California thanks to some Quaker law from the 1890's.


JSZ​


edit
I want you to know I actually Googled it and didn't find a single damn thing. I went so far as to look at stupidlaws.com and while it's apparently illegal to bathe a fox in wine, enhancing your junk with a swimsuit is perfectly legal, even in the uber conservative parts of California... like Anaheim?
 
Last edited:

Exbiker

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Posts
3,182
Media
10
Likes
2,848
Points
258
Location
Ascot (Windsor and Maidenhead, England)
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I don't imagine there are specific laws against full coverage swimming costumes of any kind. Not in California, or most other US states. There will be in some foreign countries, but that's well known.

And some places have regulations against thongs and so on.

There may be laws against lewd behaviour, but I think you'd have to have a clear erection for that to be applicable.

I've worn skimpy things in California and Florida.

The problem is not likely to be the law, so much as horribly repressed and conservative individuals.

:smile:
 
Last edited:

nudeyorker

Admired Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2006
Posts
22,744
Media
0
Likes
776
Points
208
Location
NYC/Honolulu
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Seriously...? I don't think there will be any problem; that would be like having a law against wearing a push up bra. I have an aussiebum bulge enhancing swimsuit that becomes semi-transparent when wet so I've never worn it in a family/public pool or beach. If you are uncomfortable or unsure then wear a a pair of gym shorts over your suit until you get the lay of the land so to speak and then make your choice to bulge or not to bulge.
 

Daisy

Loved Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Posts
4,742
Media
0
Likes
553
Points
258
Location
California (United States)
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Female
I love those who are speaking on behalf of California as if it's all just like the Haight-Ashbury. Hoss is right...you have no idea how many YES ON 8 bumper stickers I saw during the election, and some areas are more hardcore Republican than the South.

You know what happens when you assume..

PS I couldnt care less if you hang your dong out..Im merely saying that none of the responses here are from CA attorneys so we don't really know the answer...?
 

hollister82

Sexy Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2008
Posts
334
Media
23
Likes
58
Points
113
Location
California
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I love those who are speaking on behalf of California as if it's all just like the Haight-Ashbury. Hoss is right...you have no idea how many YES ON 8 bumper stickers I saw during the election, and some areas are more hardcore Republican than the South.

You know what happens when you assume..

PS I couldnt care less if you hang your dong out..Im merely saying that none of the responses here are from CA attorneys so we don't really know the answer...?



So much truth to this.
 

D_Percy_Prettywillie

Account Disabled
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Posts
748
Media
0
Likes
22
Points
53
This has just reached a whole new level of absurd. The presence of anti-gay conservatives and the existence and passage of Proposition 8 in California now directly correlates to the illegality of profile enhancing swimsuits for, specifically, men.

Your argument is because of A and B, C. Again, I'm going to set aside the constitutional argument, the argument that padded bikini tops are obviously legal, and the fact that an actual google search has turned up shit nothing on the subject and bring it back to my favorite part of this foray into insanity and ask again;

Assume that it is illegal to have profile enhancing swimwear anywhere in California. Now let's say the OP decides he's a maverick and wears them to a beach anyway.

How the hell would such a law be enforced? Are local police enough or do they call in the FBI's profilers, using sophisticated cameras to determine if that bulge is natural or the result of... enhancement *thunder clap*?

Is there a special division with the authority to inspect the pouches of mens swimsuits at random? What do they do when it turns out that guy in board shorts just has a huge johnson? Gift card to Applebees to avoid a multi-million dollar lawsuit?

Do you think there's potential here for a Law and Order spin off? Olivia Benson moves to LA just so she can go around inspecting junk?



JSZ​
 

D_Percy_Prettywillie

Account Disabled
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Posts
748
Media
0
Likes
22
Points
53
As opposed to, you know, The C'mon Inn in Jackson Mississippi- where still I'd think the problem wouldn't be legality, but "Big Joe" who is going to wait for you in the parking lot.

I get it; parts of California are like Eastern Washington- conservative, anti-gay, pro-Christian morality etc. I also get that they're into legislating social policy. But we're talking about something very, very small and specific. Profile enhancing swim wear for men and the notion that anyone has taken the time to legislate against specifically that, even at a municipal level, is pretty laughable because the first problem to passing a law against it is figuring out how to enforce it at which point any member of a judiciary review council would go "We've got to stop writing laws and getting high at the same time."

I say especially California because... well, you live there, you'e seen a Pride Parade no doubt. You've surely been to a beach.

If you can tell me someway to identify a naturally big bulge vs one that has been enhanced by swimwear/underwear without asking a dude or making him take off his clothes (both of which would be illegal for a police officer to do for the sole reason of determining whether or not he's big business or has a special effects team working in his pants) I'll concede the point right damn now.

We're talking about a swim suit that covers everything it's supposed to cover (so, not a thong) that simply has a specially designed pouch to make a guy look bigger. Go.



JSZ​
 

knoxareakid1

Expert Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Posts
446
Media
1
Likes
133
Points
288
Location
Nashville (Tennessee, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
No such law exists in California from what I can find. Doesn't mean such laws don't exist. Something like that would be illegal to wear in parts of Florida and is subject to a $500 fine.

Don't be calling everyone idiotic for a reasonable and fair question that clearly has more than 1 answer.
 

D_Percy_Prettywillie

Account Disabled
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Posts
748
Media
0
Likes
22
Points
53
It's a yes or no question; it literally has one answer. There are multiple opinions (apparently... which I obviously find kind of surprising) but this isn't an esoteric discussion on the nature of reality.

Something like that is illegal in parts of Florida and offenders are subject to a $500 fine are they? Then maybe you can answer the question; how do they enforce that law? And where? What parts of Florida took the time to legislate against profile enhancing swimsuits for men but not women? Seriously- if you can find the documented evidence of such laws being on the books, I would absolutely love to read it.



JSZ​