Is it "medically necessary" for men to ejaculate?

[Ann_bbw]

I am a curious late 40's woman who has read and heard many viewpoints if it is "medically necessary" for sexually active men to ejaculate and/or masturbate to orgasm if no other outlet is available. I have read about and talked to both men and women, religious and non religious viewpoints, military, prisoners, medical issues regarding ejaculations problems, and even the "NoFap" blog (a community of men who believe in no masturbation). Unfortunately with all this information the vote is still "out" regarding the necessity of men "cumming" depending on who you read about or talk too. Women seem to favor "it is not necessary" while most men favor "it is most definitely a physical need". P.S. I do enjoy what men "do" and think it is "healthy" and "normal".

 

[uclron]

I think it is necessary because the buildup of excess semen would be too great if it wasn't released somehow. I know I feel the need if I don't ejaculate regularly. Please feel free to chat with me about it in depth if you like .

 

[AlteredEgo]

I think it is necessary because the buildup of excess semen would be too great if it wasn't released somehow. I know I feel the need if I don't ejaculate regularly. Please feel free to chat with me about it in depth if you like .

But... it IS released, whether you orgasm/ejaculated or not. Excess semen is expelled in the urine and during nocturnal emissions.

 

[socalfreak]

Medically necessary to orgasm? No.
As stated above, your body will expel excess naturally.
I think many guys have a difficult time in differentiating "need" & "want", when it comes to being aroused

 

[BIGBULL29]

My nuts get a heavy-feeling if I don't shoot my male cream.

I feel physically better after a release.

But if the body need to rid itself of semen, it will naturally (nocturnal emissions, cum in urine, etc.).

 

[Jjdov27]

For me, the longer I go without release, the "heavier" and more tender my balls feel. The longer I've gone, the more intense and powerful the release. (This includes thickness, volume, and cloudiness of semen.)

However, my guess is that these sensations are more because my body is USED to consistently experiencing orgasm and ejaculation. When it doesn't happen, my body "misses" it and continues to build up as if it will happen at any time. The tenderness in my balls is probably due to normal everyday arrousal going unfulfilled, like in high school days when heavy petting didn't lead to release.

My guess is that if I ever experienced impotence or an injury that prevented me from ejaculating, my body would slowly adjust and no longer "expect" release, Lessing or eliminating these symptoms.

However, I can see how men often "interperate" these feelings as a physical NEED to ejaculate.

 

[sangheili90]

I am a curious late 40's woman who has read and heard many viewpoints if it is "medically necessary" for sexually active men to ejaculate and/or masturbate to orgasm if no other outlet is available. I have read about and talked to both men and women, religious and non religious viewpoints, military, prisoners, medical issues regarding ejaculations problems, and even the "NoFap" blog (a community of men who believe in no masturbation). Unfortunately with all this information the vote is still "out" regarding the necessity of men "cumming" depending on who you read about or talk too. Women seem to favor "it is not necessary" while most men favor "it is most definitely a physical need". P.S. I do enjoy what men "do" and think it is "healthy" and "normal".

The NoFap movement in reality is a means to wean young men off of the use of porn, as there is a belief that it desensitizes you to real life encounters with women. As for sex and/or masturbation, there is no medical for these, but a man will at some point have a nocturnal emission if he hasn't ejaculated in a given period of time. I don't recall the specific circumstances, but I've had a few moments in my life where I didn't masturbate/ejaculate for several days and I did end up ejaculating during my sleep, once during a nap.

 

[Notaes]

If I did not fuck or mastubate and have a sexual release regularly I think I would go crazy. The build up is so strong.

 

[Industrialsize]

I am a curious late 40's woman who has read and heard many viewpoints if it is "medically necessary" for sexually active men to ejaculate and/or masturbate to orgasm if no other outlet is available. I have read about and talked to both men and women, religious and non religious viewpoints, military, prisoners, medical issues regarding ejaculations problems, and even the "NoFap" blog (a community of men who believe in no masturbation). Unfortunately with all this information the vote is still "out" regarding the necessity of men "cumming" depending on who you read about or talk too. Women seem to favor "it is not necessary" while most men favor "it is most definitely a physical need". P.S. I do enjoy what men "do" and think it is "healthy" and "normal".

It seems you talked to everyone but a medical professional. I'm a registered nurse. The answer is no.

 

[AlteredEgo]

Many eastern spiritualist believe that male sexual energy and creativity have the same source, and that ejaculation expends creative power. Many athletes abstain from orgasm in the weeks or days before a competitive event to preserve their raw male power.

 

[deleted464787]

I am a curious late 40's woman who has read and heard many viewpoints if it is "medically necessary" for sexually active men to ejaculate and/or masturbate to orgasm if no other outlet is available. I have read about and talked to both men and women, religious and non religious viewpoints, military, prisoners, medical issues regarding ejaculations problems, and even the "NoFap" blog (a community of men who believe in no masturbation). Unfortunately with all this information the vote is still "out" regarding the necessity of men "cumming" depending on who you read about or talk too. Women seem to favor "it is not necessary" while most men favor "it is most definitely a physical need". P.S. I do enjoy what men "do" and think it is "healthy" and "normal".

I know this isnt something that Ann is taking on as her point of view... so I want to first come out and say that Im not bashing Ann, or ANY woman in particular about this... But if the bolded part of my quote is true, that thought really irks me. And heres why:

I recently heard someone say that when it comes to birth control, and things of that nature, women should be the ones in charge of their own bodies. And I, for one, agree with that statement... women SHOULD be in control of their bodies, because they know their bodies better than any man. And I think the reverse should be true as well. Im not saying all women are like this, but when I hear about women who think men dont NEED to ejaculate, it makes me want to rip my hair out. What would a woman know about a mans needs? Women cant possibly understand what its like to go about your day with a raging hardon sticking through your jeans for 6 hours straight, even when you arent thinking about sex.

As a man, who knows my own sexuality and my own experiences, I feel I have a right to say this (and other men, feel free to argue if you feel differently): Men are built for sex. We are simply designed to want to spread our seed as much as we can--or at least sometimes it certainly feels that way. Im sure many women would read that and think "wow, that sounds awfully chauvinistic, and a little rapey, and it makes it sounds like men simply lack self control" but its true... you cant really fight nature.

I guess what it boils down to is this: will a man die if he never ejaculates? Probably not. Is "somewhat frequent" ejaculation necessary for a mans well-being, physical or otherwise? In my experience, yes, it most definitely is.

 

[Ann_bbw]

Thanks for some very thoughtful, honest, and exciting responses. I do agree men should have a free choice as well as women when it comes to their bodies. and yes it is healthy for the mind and body and those "glands". I grew up religious and tried to abstain from sex/masturbation, it was not easy, and eventually reconciled by beliefs and enjoyed my sexuality.
I did read about some nurses, and yes, most said it was "not medically necessary". One sympathetic nurse did say orgasms could improve a persons outlook on long term illnesses, however.
I also read about some prisoners who suddenly had to stop masturbation (against prison rules), and they did experience severe mental and physical problems related to the sudden abstinence, which is what was said about the body being trained for a regular release. I felt badly for those guys, in spite they have committed a crime.
My close g/f told me how she watched her husband have a wet dream, she was waken by his stirring and watched it come out. She gave him a big kiss when he woke up after and said she would increase taking care of his needs.
I do hope you guys don't mind if this is very exciting for me to read and research. Love it.

 

[Serpentlike]

Fairly certain that if I did nothing to induce it happening it would eventually happen anyway. Three days without cumming and I leak precum all day and can hardly think of anything but sex.

 

[Snarky_succubus]

I know this isnt something that Ann is taking on as her point of view... so I want to first come out and say that Im not bashing Ann, or ANY woman in particular about this... But if the bolded part of my quote is true, that thought really irks me. And heres why:

I recently heard someone say that when it comes to birth control, and things of that nature, women should be the ones in charge of their own bodies. And I, for one, agree with that statement... women SHOULD be in control of their bodies, because they know their bodies better than any man. And I think the reverse should be true as well. Im not saying all women are like this, but when I hear about women who think men dont NEED to ejaculate, it makes me want to rip my hair out. What would a woman know about a mans needs? Women cant possibly understand what its like to go about your day with a raging hardon sticking through your jeans for 6 hours straight, even when you arent thinking about sex.

As a man, who knows my own sexuality and my own experiences, I feel I have a right to say this (and other men, feel free to argue if you feel differently): Men are built for sex. We are simply designed to want to spread our seed as much as we can--or at least sometimes it certainly feels that way. Im sure many women would read that and think "wow, that sounds awfully chauvinistic, and a little rapey, and it makes it sounds like men simply lack self control" but its true... you cant really fight nature.

I guess what it boils down to is this: will a man die if he never ejaculates? Probably not. Is "somewhat frequent" ejaculation necessary for a mans well-being, physical or otherwise? In my experience, yes, it most definitely is.

There's so much wrong with this argument it's absurd.
There is NO comparison between a woman being in control of her own body and a man having an opinion on whether or not it's "medically necessary" to ejaculate. Apples and oranges. Having the right to choose whether or not to get pregnant isn't about women "knowing their bodies better than any man". It's about being in control of their own bodies and having the right to not carry a child despite what any other person feels that they should do. No one's religion or opinion should have any say in whether or not I chose to play host to a tiny human being for 9 months. That is not a male/female issue. Personally, I think the fact that so many women play up the male/female angle is stupid. I don't really give a damn if it's a man or a woman writing the laws... Telling me I have no choice in being pregnant is a problem... and there are plenty of women who would write the law that way if they could.

As for knowing your own sexuality and having a "right to say this". You have a right to say whatever you want but your right doesn't make your argument solid. She asked if it was "medically necessary". That's a simple yes or no answer and the answer is no. She didn't ask if you would feel happy. She didn't ask if it would be frustrating for you. She didn't ask if it would be comfortable. She asked if it was a medical necessity. This isn't a woman vs. men question and it isn't a matter of opinion. Science. Period. "Will a man die if he never ejaculates? Probably not.". Ummm.... Nope. He won't die.

As for "you cant really fight nature". Also not true. Again, it may not be easy or comfortable... and on a global level, nature will always win... but person to person... You can fight nature. Technology fights nature every single day. On a smaller scale, you can fight your sexual urges, too. Gay people fought their sexuality and lived in straight marriages for a long long time (I'm sure some probably still do). Priests, nuns, and monks fight their sexuality every day. Hell, I know straight women who would be more accurately classified as asexual... No interest in sex at all... but they still have sex with their husbands because they don't want their husband's need to be neglected or because they feel like it's their obligation. You can't change your sexuality... What turns you on, turns you on... but abstinence is possible. And this... "We are simply designed to want to spread our seed as much as we can--or at least sometimes it certainly feels that way." certainly does sound rapey... but the fact of the matter is... *most* men manage not to rape people. So, you *can* fight nature.

 

[sangheili90]

Many eastern spiritualist believe that male sexual energy and creativity have the same source, and that ejaculation expends creative power. Many athletes abstain from orgasm in the weeks or days before a competitive event to preserve their raw male power.

That long held urban tale has been scientifically debunked.

 

[AdamHenry]

Thanks for some very thoughtful, honest, and exciting responses. I do agree men should have a free choice as well as women when it comes to their bodies. and yes it is healthy for the mind and body and those "glands". I grew up religious and tried to abstain from sex/masturbation, it was not easy, and eventually reconciled by beliefs and enjoyed my sexuality.
I did read about some nurses, and yes, most said it was "not medically necessary". One sympathetic nurse did say orgasms could improve a persons outlook on long term illnesses, however.
I also read about some prisoners who suddenly had to stop masturbation (against prison rules), and they did experience severe mental and physical problems related to the sudden abstinence, which is what was said about the body being trained for a regular release. I felt badly for those guys, in spite they have committed a crime.
My close g/f told me how she watched her husband have a wet dream, she was waken by his stirring and watched it come out. She gave him a big kiss when he woke up after and said she would increase taking care of his needs.
I do hope you guys don't mind if this is very exciting for me to read and research. Love it.

As a guy I'm happy to see a lady take interest in the subject. Women who denounce it have no idea. That's like me telling a lady how to have a baby. It may not be necessary in the medical sense, but you do become agitated. At least I do. I think about sex a lot. Even when I don't want to. So if I don't either take care of it myself or include someone, I become agitated and restless. It even affects my sleep. I can still function in society etc and all that other good stuff. I don't sexually harass or anything like that. It's just like having an itch that you can't reach. I am not relaxed. I become hypersensitive to female voices and and their presence around me. I can even get that way around certain effeminate guys. Feels like pent up tension for lack of better words. After I cum, I am thoroughly relaxed and can focus on other things than the thought of "breeding" so to speak.

 

[sangheili90]

ejaculating is healthy

Definitely, there is some scientific evidence out there that shows men who ejaculate more often are less likely to develop prostate cancer.

 

[malakos]

Definitely, there is some scientific evidence out there that shows men who ejaculate more often are less likely to develop prostate cancer.

Yes, I remember reading about this study several years ago. If the study came to a correct conclusion, doesn't that indicate that regular orgasm/ejaculation is an important part of maintaining a healthy prostate? And therefore it is "medically necessary" (I would deem anything that has to be done to maintain good health as a medical necessity)?

 

[sangheili90]

Yes, I remember reading about this study several years ago. If the study came to a correct conclusion, doesn't that indicate that regular orgasm/ejaculation is an important part of maintaining a healthy prostate? And therefore it is "medically necessary" (I would deem anything that has to be done to maintain good health as a medical necessity)?

In my opinion, I would see the definition of "medical necessity" as something that is required for survival. Sleeping 8 hours per day may be more optimal for your health but you wouldn't die from not getting that. Eating 5+ servings of fruit and vegetables may be necessary for optimal health but is not needed for survival.

However, the logical take home should be to enjoy a healthy, active and regular sex life due to the many benefits associated with it.

 

[malakos]

Sleeping 8 hours per day may be more optimal for your health but you wouldn't die from not getting that.

Yeah, but I think you're underestimating how important good sleep is for health. If we take it to the extreme, if one consistently got 4 hours of poor sleep every day for their adult life, I wouldn't be surprised if it shaved a couple decades off their lifespan. The gravity of that approaches a justification for medical necessity, IMO.