It's both rude and offensive. 
If that's all you care about pay for a gigolo. :irked:
Says the (apparently former) unabashed size queen who once had her minimum requirements in her signature.
Are you suddenly okay with smaller now or is your M.O. to fuck them then dump them if they don't measure up?
While I wouldn't be offended, it would probably lead me to think that she was interested in casual sex rather than a serious relationship.
I wouldn't be offended but I'd view it as a very telling question. And since, as a rule, I find size queens unattractive, it'd make it a lot less likely that we'd ever make it to the point of actually having sex.
Steve
I have to ask why this is unattractive. I understand why smaller or average endowed guys would think so but I'm confused to hear it from the bigger guys.
Why doesn't such a question just mean that she's interested in sex enough that she's taken notice of what she likes or needs? Doesn't the fact that it's important enough to be a consideration indicate that sex with the right person (mind and body) is something she likes and will continue to enjoy long term?
How often do we hear of sexual relations dropping off drastically after marriage or after a couple of years? In most instances it's the woman we hear who has slowed the pace. Don't you think that's less likely with a woman who likes sex, particularly if you do have the size that she's asking about?
If you find women who know that larger is what works for them unattractive does that mean that you're attracted to a woman whose attitude towards sex is, *shrug*, "Whatever."?
Sure. That makes sense.
A woman who asks that question is interested in sex enough that you can discuss issues and fantasies without being labeled a perv for it. That's not a good thing?
A woman who asks that question knows what she likes and is willing to communicate that so that when sex does happen she'll help you learn her body and her orgasms will be genuine. If she's attentive enough to know her own likes she's also likely to be attentive to your likes as well. These aren't good things?
A woman who asks this question will view your size as a gift, not an obstacle. Reduced likelihood of mysterious headaches and complaints of soreness. Increased likelihood of desire, eagerness, skill and even fit. These aren't good things?
What's more, a woman who asks this question knows that by the asking alone she's likely opening herself up to judgement for it so it shows that she is willing to make herself emotionally vulnerable to you. That's not a good thing?
See, you trick the guy into going into the conversation and you set it up so that you still create a comfortable environment. It helps to play stupid a little.
Perfect. Head games.
Do you want the woman who's forthright or the one who will manipulate with games be it for information or anything else?
She's already dating you without knowing the answer to this question so I would hope you'd realize there are other qualities about you that attract her. You're already dating her so you must find qualities in her that are attractive. Why is it that a guy who
does have the size to satisfy said size queen would suddenly find her attraction to just one more quality about him unattractive? Why should it disqualify her as relationship material?
I don't get why for the well hung guy instead of this question triggering jackpot bells the impression is she's only worth a screw or two, if that.
I'm mystified.
I was under the impression that men
liked sex.
Silly me.
