Is it possible for a man to look overly promiscuous without saying anything?

[deleted958628]

I don’t think it’s clothing, but behaviour that might give off clues. Perhaps a guy who keeps looking at other women while I’m talking to him, or is overly flirty with other women while I’m not looking or absent for a few minutes. I’ve dated a few guys who gave me the impression they were looking to ‘trade up’ while they were with me. It never lasted longer than that one date.

Not saying you were doing that, but even if you were nervous and not totally focused, it might have seemed you weren’t interested? I don’t know.

I was particularly interested actually. She even made jote of that and my ability to communicate. We hadnt done too much communication to begin with before she said that which is what puzzled me. And ive been tested by enough women at this point to not let my eyes really wander. I was genuinely stumped

 

[deleted958628]

I

Well, if you're wearing anything similar to this then that could be a big tip off.

I definitley left that one in the closet. Thats more 3rd date material. I tend to wear that one on the 32nd of the month.

 

[ArtAppreciation]

Just my opinion, but guys who look like they are attractive to most women...tend to turn me off. Maybe it’s the assumption that because they have a huge potential number of female sex partners, they have probably taken advantage of that. I don’t really believe that I’d be comfortable dating someone who I always had to worry about. Worry since he gets hit on all the time, that some day he would eventually give in to temptation.

There is a difference between a guy who is just a dog (anyone can be a dog if he disrespects women) and a guy who is very good looking. I do tend to just categorise alll very conventionally attractive guys as potentially a problem. Just my 2 cents

 

[Tight_N_Juicy]

Just my opinion, but guys who look like they are attractive to most women...tend to turn me off. Maybe it’s the assumption that because they have a huge potential number of female sex partners, they have probably taken advantage of that. I don’t really believe that I’d be comfortable dating someone who I always had to worry about. Worry since he gets hit on all the time, that some day he would eventually give in to temptation.

There is a difference between a guy who is just a dog (anyone can be a dog if he disrespects women) and a guy who is very good looking. I do tend to just categorise alll very conventionally attractive guys as potentially a problem. Just my 2 cents

If it's not inappropriate, can I ask if you find yourself more likely to flirt/hit on a man based on looks?

I ask because I thought about it, and I actually flirt with personalities over good looks. If a guy makes me laugh, I'm way more likely to attempt to get near him than if he's just good looking and doesn't say anything that catches my ear.

Anyway, I hope my question isn't rude I just curious n stuff

 

[AlteredEgo]

I only date men whom I find attractive. I'm not just talking about looks, but, looks are definitely included. I'm not some weirdo with strange, obscure tastes. If I want him, I'm sure other women do too. The idea that all men are only as faithful as their options dictate is sexist. Find an ethical man who trust you implicitly, keep his trust, and you'll have your loyalty. It has to be both of those things. People are just people. An ethical person can falter; they just feel badly about it. An untrustworthy person can trust you if they recognize that you aren't motivated by the same forces that drive them. But an ethical man who trusts you deeply will always be loyal if you hold up your end of the bargain and keep your expressed and implied promises. Break your promises, and he will leave or break his too because once such a man loses faith in you, he no longer wants to be faithful to you.

 

[Lovin.life7]

Maybe the "definitely not more than one" comment in relation to her questioning you if you had a girlfriend. I know she said you look like one but maybe she meant you seem like one? Personally if a guy is a slick talker, that leads me to think he is just saying what you want to hear. I would call them a player, not a dog.