Is "lol" overused?

earllogjam

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2006
Posts
4,917
Media
0
Likes
186
Points
193
Sexuality
No Response
Ever feel "lol" is overuse? It seems like it is almost every text message or internet interaction with another person. I understand it is used to soften or make more friendly the text but do you think it's so overused to the point of it becoming meaningless? lol.
 

pcghabsy

Legendary Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Posts
2,573
Media
8
Likes
1,010
Points
333
Location
India
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
Depends on who you are chatting with. But yes, it's true, I can't help but say "laughed out loud" aloud in my mind everytime someone types lol. And some people do type it every couple of lines which makes me think they might suffer from some kind of manic laughter disorder.
 

pcghabsy

Legendary Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Posts
2,573
Media
8
Likes
1,010
Points
333
Location
India
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
The people whore are especially bad for over loling slip into verbal conversations :rolleyes:

A friend has accidentally said "lol" a couple of times instead of actually, err, laughing. That did make me laugh out loud!
 

petite

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Posts
7,199
Media
2
Likes
146
Points
208
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Female
It depends on context. If someone keeps making one liner funnies in a chat conversation, then I think feedback that you are appreciating their humor is good. It's a substitute for the fact that they cannot hear you or see your face. I suppose that one could try to think of unique ways to tell the other person each time you laughed at something funny that they said, but that would slow down the conversation and be a lot more awkward. And with chat, immediate feedback is helpful, since without it you don't know if the person walked away from the keyboard, or had a stroke, or what until they respond to the last thing that you type. You could just keep saying, "Oh I read that last thing and you're really clever. I'm still here." Or you could say, "Lol!"

It's also a way of letting someone know that a line was meant facetiously or sarcastically instead of deadpan serious without writing "I was being sarcastic just now." That actually makes it a lot less funny than "lol."

In those ways I think it's a useful substitute for things like tone of voice and facial expressions.
 
Last edited:

LaFemme

Mythical Member
Staff
Moderator
Verified
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Posts
42,298
Media
2
Likes
39,394
Points
743
Location
Canada
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Female
It depends on context. If someone keeps making one liner funnies in a chat conversation, then I think feedback that you are appreciating their humor is good. It's a substitute for the fact that they cannot hear you or see your face. I suppose that one could try to think of unique ways to tell the other person each time you laughed at something funny that they said, but that would slow down the conversation and be a lot more awkward. And with chat, immediate feedback is helpful, since without it you don't know if the person walked away from the keyboard, or had a stroke, or what until they respond to the last thing that you type. You could just keep saying, "Oh I read that last thing and you're really clever. I'm still here." Or you could say, "Lol!"

It's also a way of letting someone know that a line was meant facetiously or sarcastically instead of deadpan serious without writing "I was being sarcastic just now." That actually makes it a lot less funny than "lol."

In those ways I think it's a useful substitute for things like tone of voice and facial expressions.

I agree with Petite. Especially the bit about worrying about the other person having a stroke if there's no response. lol
 

SilverTrain

Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Posts
4,623
Media
82
Likes
1,329
Points
333
Location
USA
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Brilliantly put.

It depends on context. If someone keeps making one liner funnies in a chat conversation, then I think feedback that you are appreciating their humor is good. It's a substitute for the fact that they cannot hear you or see your face. I suppose that one could try to think of unique ways to tell the other person each time you laughed at something funny that they said, but that would slow down the conversation and be a lot more awkward. And with chat, immediate feedback is helpful, since without it you don't know if the person walked away from the keyboard, or had a stroke, or what until they respond to the last thing that you type. You could just keep saying, "Oh I read that last thing and you're really clever. I'm still here." Or you could say, "Lol!"

It's also a way of letting someone know that a line was meant facetiously or sarcastically instead of deadpan serious without writing "I was being sarcastic just now." That actually makes it a lot less funny than "lol."

In those ways I think it's a useful substitute for things like tone of voice and facial expressions.
 

nudeyorker

Admired Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2006
Posts
22,742
Media
0
Likes
841
Points
208
Location
NYC/Honolulu
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I can't wait for Bbucko's response to this thread. My own personal opinion is it should only be used if you actually laughed out loud. I think many actually use the expression when perhaps they only had a wan smile or a tiny chortle. (it's just wrong) LOL!
 

Endued

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Posts
1,858
Media
0
Likes
29
Points
133
Sexuality
No Response
It used to annoy me a little how often it seems to get used in place of a full stop. But it doesn't bother me now lol
 

petite

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Posts
7,199
Media
2
Likes
146
Points
208
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Female
A long time ago people used j/k to indicate when they were joking. It meant "just kidding." It seems like lol has replaced that now.

How about smilies? Is it better to respond with :) or :p than with lol?
 

rob_just_rob

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2005
Posts
5,857
Media
0
Likes
43
Points
183
Location
Nowhere near you
I think it's a gross exaggeration most of the time. It is used to signify amusement, but I've probably laughed out loud during a text conversation less than ten times in my life.

some alternative suggestions:

good, that's (a) funny one - GTFO
really, that's (a) funny message - RTFM
seriously, that's funny - STFU
you should seriously consider comedy - YSSCKY
 

erratic

Loved Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Posts
4,289
Media
0
Likes
509
Points
333
Sexuality
No Response
Yeah, I think it's pretty overused. It's like "epic" (that movie was epic, that grind was epic, that pizza was epic) or "solutions" (office solutions, business solutions, mathematical solutions, Christmas solutions). It's used for so many things that it's kind of losing its meaning. That can work (witness the word "like"), but when words are used as punctuation I think it's time to consider how over-applied they may be.
 

B_Over_Endowed_EMT

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2011
Posts
110
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
53
Location
California
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I do catch myself do it a lot. It seems like its become a sort of nervous habit for me in my online lexicon. But apparently its not yet since it hasnt been added to the "banned" words list.
 

D_Budd_Hert

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Posts
686
Media
0
Likes
7
Points
103
Location
.
Sexuality
No Response
LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL. LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL. LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL. LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL. LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL.LOL...HAH !!! DAMN U HickBoy! contagious bugger !!!!
 
Last edited by a moderator: