it's cheating under the rules of marriage. But so is taking sex away from the marriage.
As other people posted, lack of sex in a marriage is a major issue. In fact legally not having sex for a year is a legal and fair reason for a divorce... and in some odd and extraordinary cases has led to straight up annulments.
So what does that mean? Sex is part of a marriage by law, and by religion as well. (god says make babies)
So what's better?
Cheat or divorce.
Praying Mantis brought this up earlier, i haven't read all the posts so i hope i don't step on her posts and repeat past points.
If a wife takes sex away in a marriage. This forces the husband with only 3 options.
a.) cheat
b.) agree to a sexless marriage and be unhappy
c.) divorce
Those are really the only options available. The wife would be happy if the husband were to agree to B.
However take this for example. This would be the equivalent of a husband taking sex from his wife. Taking sex away entirely is almost as bad as forcing sex from a partner. (breaking a contract as apposed to forcing a contract) [however i personally see rape as much worse than keeping sex away but from a black and white universe of right and wrong and contracts.... it's on the same playing field.]
Take option C (divorce) for example. If a husband were to approach his wife seriously and state that unless she has sex with him on a regular basis, he will divorce her. This in turn would make the wife feel betrayed, and horrified of such an idea. (most women in general as well) Most wives feel like they can dictate the sex in a marriage, and just take it away even if the marriage is going perfectly fine in every aspect other than sex life. [personally i'd rather masturbate than tell a woman to have sex with me, if the girl isn't into it, than i'm not. plain and simple.]
So now it comes down to cheating. Cheating is wrong. We all know that. But when u weigh it down with the other options it's level of evil becomes more gray, in my opinion
... so lets put it into perspective from a husbands point of view. In which the options are modified to counteract the above options.
A.) Cheat
B.) Force Sex From the Partner
C.) Threaten Divorce
However all that has been said CAN be nullified by option D
D.) Talk
I've always maintained an open discussion with my partners about sex.
However i've heard people tell me that they try to talk about it with their wives and their wives just straight shoot them down, and tell them sex in not going to happen.
So is cheating alright? no
is forcing a sexless marriage? no
if forcing sex? no
is making an ultimatum for sex using a divorce as a weapon? no
In the end if talking fails, than divorce is the only option that is not considered "wrong."
It's all crap in the end.
As other people posted, lack of sex in a marriage is a major issue. In fact legally not having sex for a year is a legal and fair reason for a divorce... and in some odd and extraordinary cases has led to straight up annulments.
So what does that mean? Sex is part of a marriage by law, and by religion as well. (god says make babies)
So what's better?
Cheat or divorce.
Praying Mantis brought this up earlier, i haven't read all the posts so i hope i don't step on her posts and repeat past points.
If a wife takes sex away in a marriage. This forces the husband with only 3 options.
a.) cheat
b.) agree to a sexless marriage and be unhappy
c.) divorce
Those are really the only options available. The wife would be happy if the husband were to agree to B.
However take this for example. This would be the equivalent of a husband taking sex from his wife. Taking sex away entirely is almost as bad as forcing sex from a partner. (breaking a contract as apposed to forcing a contract) [however i personally see rape as much worse than keeping sex away but from a black and white universe of right and wrong and contracts.... it's on the same playing field.]
Take option C (divorce) for example. If a husband were to approach his wife seriously and state that unless she has sex with him on a regular basis, he will divorce her. This in turn would make the wife feel betrayed, and horrified of such an idea. (most women in general as well) Most wives feel like they can dictate the sex in a marriage, and just take it away even if the marriage is going perfectly fine in every aspect other than sex life. [personally i'd rather masturbate than tell a woman to have sex with me, if the girl isn't into it, than i'm not. plain and simple.]
So now it comes down to cheating. Cheating is wrong. We all know that. But when u weigh it down with the other options it's level of evil becomes more gray, in my opinion
... so lets put it into perspective from a husbands point of view. In which the options are modified to counteract the above options.
A.) Cheat
B.) Force Sex From the Partner
C.) Threaten Divorce
However all that has been said CAN be nullified by option D
D.) Talk
I've always maintained an open discussion with my partners about sex.
However i've heard people tell me that they try to talk about it with their wives and their wives just straight shoot them down, and tell them sex in not going to happen.
So is cheating alright? no
is forcing a sexless marriage? no
if forcing sex? no
is making an ultimatum for sex using a divorce as a weapon? no
In the end if talking fails, than divorce is the only option that is not considered "wrong."
It's all crap in the end.