typicaly with animals (like zebras and dogs) genetic traits take alot time to change because they dont have the same brain capacity as we do. but humans can choose who they want to mate with by statistics. i know it sounds wrong but if more women are having sex with guys with bigger penises then more kids in the new generation will have big penises. also all of the chemicals and polution that we have set into our atmosphere recently might have some sort of an effect on genetic mutations.
You still won't see a massive difference in a whole generation, even a huge selection pressure for women to mate with hung men (and I don't think this huge selection pressure exists), would have a miniscule effect on one generation. There might me some bigger pensies, and a miniscule rise in the average. There would only be a noticable change at a population level over many generations if a selection pressure to mate with large pensies keeps up all that time.
You seem to have a few misconceptions about how evolution and natural selection works, as well as human relationships. It might be true that, if women selected partners by statistics, we would see larger penises in a few generations. However, most people's penis length is not on record for women to look up and choose the biggest one to have kids with. Women select partners for a huge number of different reasons. Animals too; they don't just fuck the first male that comes along, mate selection in animals is a very complex process.
rogue_mj said:
WRONG
as a doctor, my colleagues and I comment fairly frequently that the boys of today are at least an inch or two longer than our generation (40 yrs old here)
most teens have bigger cocks than the adults in my practice...... and i get to see dick daily !!!!
so YES today's generation is bigger (including cocks)
and the WHO (world health organization) is even revising the height and weight growth charts as children are exeeding the normal values statistically placing them in a greater percentile, when actually they are similar to their peers.........
As a "doctor", you should know that what you see in your own experience is not necessarily statisically representative of the population as a whole. Nor does larger height and wieght reference ranges have anything to do with penis size, unless you can pint me to a robust study of penis size showing a strong correlation between penis size and either height or weight? Didn't think so.
Most doctors don't either "see dick daily", except their own or their partners, or if they're a urologist; and they certainly don't discuss their relative sizes with their colleagues. Either you're full of shit, or just deeply unprofessional with no respect for your patients' confidentiality.